Skip to main content

Accounting for Our Settler Colonialism: Toward an Unsettled German Studies in the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Accommodating both decolonization and diversity in reshaping German Studies brings together two potentially incommensurable discourses. A chasm opens up when decolonization is first, repeatedly taken up metaphorically as a “decolonization of the mind,” and second, made commensurate with diversity frameworks. Both impulses in the decolonization of German Studies appear to be at odds with Decolonial Studies. In this essay, we first map out the conflict between decolonization as “decolonization of the mind” and decolonization as theorized by Indigenous Decolonial scholars. We then engage with challenges Decolonial Studies pose to German Studies specifically. Finally, we examine practices in our field that contribute to the continued erasure of Indigenous life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Patrick Wolfe defines “settler colonialism [as] an inclusive, land-centred project that coordinates a comprehensive range of agencies, from the metropolitan centre to the frontier encampment, with a view to eliminating Indigenous societies” (Wolfe 2006, p. 393).

  2. 2.

    “The commons is an organization of human activity that ‘vests all property in the community and organizes labor for the common benefit of all.’ Thus, the commons is much more than a resource: it is a practice-a practice of commoning” (Linebaugh as cited in Sharma and Wright 2008, p. 131).

References

  • Bontempelli, Pier Carlo. 2003. Knowledge Power and Discipline: German Studies and National Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, Sebastian. 2012. German Colonialism: A Short History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Tayeb, Fatima. 2011. European Others: Queering Ethnicity in Postnational Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, Matthew P. 2018. Colonialism, Postcolonialism, and Decolonization. Central European History 51 (1): 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gausset, Quentin, Justin Kenrick, and Robert Gibb. 2011. Indigeneity and Autochthony: A Couple of False Twins? Social Anthropology 19 (2): 135–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herminghouse, Patricia. 2005. German Studies in the USA: A History of Crises. Otago German Studies 20: 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, Malathi Michelle. 2014. “Not Mere Abstractions: Language Policies and Language Ideologies in U.S. Settler Colonialism.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 3 (2): 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Michael T. 1989. Identity, Critique, Affirmation: A Response to Hinrich C. Seeba’s Paper. The German Quarterly 62 (2): 155–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzniar, Alice. 1996. Cross-Gendered Cross-Cultural Studies and the German Program. In The Future of Germanistik in the USA: Changing Our Prospects, edited by John A. McCarthy and Katrin Schneider, 122–31. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, Sara. 1989. Feminist Scholarship and Germanistik. The German Quarterly 62 (2): 158–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, Aimee Carrillo, and Eve Tuck. 2017. “Settler Colonialism and Cultural Studies: Ongoing Settlement, Cultural Production, and Resistance.” Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 17 (1): 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Arundhati. 2008. “The Monster in the Mirror.” The Guardian, December 12, sec. World News. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/dec/12/mumbai-arundhati-roy.

  • Saiz, Albert, and Elena Zoido. 2002. The Returns to Speaking a Second Language. Working Paper (Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia), No. 2–16, Research Dept, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeba, Hinrich C. 1989. Critique of Identity Formation: Toward an Intercultural Model of German Studies. The German Quarterly 62 (2): 144–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyhan, Azade. 1989. Prospects for Feminist Literary Theory in German Studies: A Response to Sara Lennox’s Paper. The German Quarterly 62 (2): 171–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Nandita. 2017. “Migrants and Indigenous Nationalism.” In The Routledge International Handbook of European Social Transformations, edited by Peeter Vihalemm, Anu Masso, and Signe Opermann, 225–36. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Nandita, and Cynthia Wright. 2008. “Decolonizing Resistance, Challenging Colonial States.” Social Justice 35 no. 3 (113): 120–38. Accessed January 7, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/29768504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sium, Aman, Chandni Desai, and Eric Ritskes. 2012. “Towards the ‘Tangible Unknown’: Decolonization and the Indigenous Future.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1 (1): I–XIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2003. Death of a Discipline. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TallBear, Kim. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trommler, Frank. 2015. “German Studies: The Short Version.” In Taking Stock of German Studies in the United States, NED-New edition, 15–28. Rochester, NY: Boydell and Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang. 2012. “Decolonization Is Not a Metaphor.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1 (1): 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuhiwai Smith, Linda, Eve Tuck, and K Wayne Yang, eds. 2019. Indigenous and Decolonizing Studies in Education: Mapping the Long View. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usbeck, Franck. 2013. “Learning from ‘Tribal Ancestors:’ How the Nazis Used Indian Imagery to Promote a ‘Holistic’ Understanding of Nature Among Germans.” ELOHI: Peuples Indigènes et Environnement 4 (July): 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierlacher, Alois, and Andrea Bogner. 2003. Handbuch interkulturelle Germanistik. J.B. Metzler: Sonderausgabe.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Patrick. 2006. Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native. Journal of Genocide Research 8 (4): 387–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashwin Manthripragada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Manthripragada, A., Mušanović, E. (2020). Accounting for Our Settler Colonialism: Toward an Unsettled German Studies in the United States. In: Criser, R., Malakaj, E. (eds) Diversity and Decolonization in German Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34342-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics