Skip to main content

Evaluation of the Workplace in Order to Reduce Waste in Material Flow

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
4th EAI International Conference on Management of Manufacturing Systems

Abstract

Value flow management, quality in the logistics chain without unnecessary waste, optimization of transport, and standardization of logistics processes are considered as significant characteristics of lean logistics. This article focuses on the analysis and evaluation of existing material flow at the manufacturing operation. The assessment is based on comparing the total distance traveled during the transport of material for certain time consumption. And due to financial indicators, the costs necessary for the operation of the production workplace are monitored. In the efficient operation of the production system, efforts are made to minimize traffic routes, thereby reducing transport costs as well as the need for means of transport.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kosturiak, J., & Frolik, Z. (2006). Lean and innovative enterprise (1st ed.). Praha: Alfa Publishing, s.r.o.. (in Czech).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean thinking banish waste and create wealth in your corporation (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press, Simon & Schuster, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota way. 14 management principles from the world greatest manufacturer (1st ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bauerhansl, T., Hompel, M., & Vogel-Heuser, B. (2014). Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik (1st ed.). Springer Vieweg, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Onofrejova, D., & Janekova, J. (2016). Design concept of digital production system. Transfer of Innovations, 20(33), 169–173.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ottomotors.com: What is the smart factory and its impact on manufacturing, https://ottomotors.com/blog/what-is-the-smart-factory-manufacturing. Accessed 02 Mar 2018.

  7. Fei, T., Jiangfeng, C. H., Qinglin, Q., Meng, Z., He, Z., & Fangyuan, S. (2018). Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(9–12), 3563–3576.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Simsik, D., et al. (2017). Identification, modelling and simulation of systems (1st ed.). Kosice: Edition of educational literature. (in Slovak).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Onofrejova, D., Onofrej, P., & Simsik, D. (2014). Model of production environment controlled with intelligent systems. In Procedia engineering: Modelling of mechanical and mechatronic systems MMaMS 2014: 25th–27th November 2014, High Tatras, Slovakia. No. 96 (pp. 330–337).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Onofrejova, D., & Simsik, D. (2019). Change in concept from conventional to digital factory of the future. MM Science Journal, 12(5), 3453--3457.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Synergycad: Feige filling: Autodesk factory design suit increases competitive edge, https://synergiscadblog.com/2013/09/19/feige-filling-autodesk-factory-design-suite-increases-competitive-edge/. Accessed 05 Apr 2018.

  12. Panda, A., Jurko, J., & Pandova, I. (2016). Monitoring and evaluation of production processes an analysis of the automotive industry (1st ed.). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Straka, M., et al. (2017). Application of EXTENDSIM for improvement of production logistics’ efficiency. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 16(3), 422–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Onofrejova, D., & Janekova, J. (2017). Critical drivers that influence an operation performance. Studia i Materialy, 6(37), 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fabianova, J., Janekova, J., & Onofrejova, D. (2017). Cost analysis of poor quality using a software simulation. Amfiteatru Economic, 19(44), 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Janekova, J., et al. (2018). Product mix optimization based on Monte Carlo simulation: A case study. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 17(2), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Trebuna, P., et al. (2017). Economic evaluation of investment project in the area of sheet metal processing. Metalurgija, 2(56), 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vagas, M., et al. (2018). Safety as necessary aspect of automated systems. In ICETA 2018: Proceedings: 16th IEEE International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (pp. 617–622). New Jersey: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Vagas, M., Simsik, D., & Onofrejova, D. (2019). Factors for successfully implementation of automated solutions based on industry 4.0. In ARTEP 2019 Automatization and control in theory and praxis: 13. Annual conference of researchers from universities, educational high schools and companies (pp. 1–8). Kosice: Technical University of Kosice.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pachnikova, L., Janos, R., & Sidlovska, L. (2013). Manufacturing systems suitable for globalized market. Applied Mechanics and Materials., 282, 230–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Slovak Grant Agency KEGA 026TUKE-4/2017 Implementation of innovative educational approaches and tools to enhance the development of the core competencies graduate study program Industrial Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Onofrejova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Onofrejova, D., Kadarova, J., Simsik, D., Janekova, J. (2020). Evaluation of the Workplace in Order to Reduce Waste in Material Flow. In: Knapcikova, L., Balog, M., Perakovic, D., Perisa, M. (eds) 4th EAI International Conference on Management of Manufacturing Systems. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34272-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34272-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34271-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34272-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics