Skip to main content

Classifying Teachers’ Self-reported Productivity, Stress and Indoor Environmental Quality Using Environmental Sensors

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Ambient Intelligence (AmI 2019)

Abstract

Considering that urban people spend majority of their time indoors, buildings should support health and productivity. However, quite commonly unsatisfactory Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) causes environmental stress, which can lead to adverse health outcomes and reduced productivity. First step to enable automatic environmental control is to recognise environmental conditions that can negatively influence each individual. To this end, we developed (1) multi-sensor IEQ monitoring system to measure objectively environmental quality; (2) mobile application to collect subjective evaluation of productivity, stress and IEQ data; (3) machine learning method to use IEQ data to distinguish between positive and negative self-reports of test subjects. Experimental results with real life data, collected in four classrooms of Finnish elementary school during 18 weeks, show that IEQ sensor data allows to classify with fairly high accuracy perceptions of teachers regarding their work productivity (91%), stress (81%) and IEQ (92%). This result was achieved in person-specific training (i.e., model of each individual was trained using only his/her data), whereas accuracy of leave-one-person-out approach was notably lower. These results suggest that perception is personal and some individuals are more sensitive to environmental stressors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kraus, M.: Exploring determining factors of indoor environment quality (IEQ). In: 18th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference (SGEM 2018), Sofia, vol. 18, pp. 701–706 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steinemann, A., Wargocki, P., Rismanchi, B.: Ten questions concerning green buildings and indoor air quality. Build. Environ. 112, 351–358 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chrousos, G.P.: Stress and disorders of the stress system. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 5(7), 374 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisk, W.J.: Health and productivity gains from better indoor environments and their relationship with building energy efficiency. Annu. Rev. Energy Env. 25(1), 537–566 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arif, M., Katafygiotou, M., Mazroei, A., Kaushik, A., Elsarrag, E.: Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: a review of the literature. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5(1), 1–11 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamb, S., Kwok, K.C.: A longitudinal investigation of work environment stressors on the performance and wellbeing of office workers. Appl. Ergon. 52, 104–111 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geng, Y., Ji, W., Lin, B., Zhu, Y.: The impact of thermal environment on occupant IEQ perception and productivity. Build. Environ. 121, 158–167 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wargocki, P., Ten Wyon, D.P.: questions concerning thermal and indoor air quality effects on the performance of office work and schoolwork. Build. Environ. 112, 359–366 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lan, L., Wargocki, P., Lian, Z.: Quantitative measurement of productivity loss due to thermal discomfort. Energy Build. 43(5), 1057–1062 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clausen, G., Wyon, D.P.: The combined effects of many different indoor environmental factors on acceptability and office work performance. HVAC&R Res. 14(1), 103–113 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, J., de Dear, R., Candido, C., Zhang, H., Arens, E.: Gender differences in office occupant perception of indoor environmental quality (IEQ). Build. Environ. 70, 245–256 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alberdi, A., Aztiria, A., Basarab, A.: Towards an automatic early stress recognition system for office environments based on multimodal measurements: a review. J. Biomed. Inform. 59, 49–75 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. EFA. Indoor air quality. http://www.efanet.org/air-quality/indoor-air-quality. Accessed 03 Sept 2019

  15. MCF-LW12CO2. https://www.mcf16.com/prodotto/mcf-lw12co2/. Accessed 03 Sept 2019

  16. Finnish Ministry of Social Affairs and Health: Decree of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health on Health-related Conditions of Housing and Other Residential Buildings and Qualification Requirements for Third-party Experts (545/2015). https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2015/en20150545.pdf. Accessed 07 June 2019

  17. tsfresh documentation. https://buildmedia.readthedocs.org/media/pdf/tsfresh/latest/tsfresh.pdf. Accessed 03 Sept 2019

  18. Finell, E., et al.: The associations of indoor environment and psychosocial factors on the subjective evaluation of indoor air quality among lower secondary school students: a multilevel analysis. Indoor Air 27(2), 329–337 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Al, H.Y., Arif, M., Kaushik, A., Mazroei, A., Katafygiotou, M., Elsarrag, E.: Occupant productivity and office indoor environment quality: a review of the literature. Build. Environ. 105, 369–389 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. GAIA project. http://gaia-project.eu/index.php/en/gaia-objectives/. Accessed 03 Sept 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the pilot participants for their active and significant role in the pilot. Special thanks to Mr. Jari Rehu, Mr. Severi Olsbo and our former colleague Mr. Dan Bendas. The study was implemented in collaboration with ESTABLISH and SCOTT projects. ESTABLISH (ITEA3 15008) was supported by Business Finland and VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, and the pilot was designed in collaboration with UniqAir, CGI, and InspectorSec. SCOTT (Secure COnnected Trustable Things) has received funding from the Electronic Component Systems for European Leadership Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 737422. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, and from Austria, Spain, Finland, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Netherlands, Belgium and Norway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanna Kallio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kallio, J. et al. (2019). Classifying Teachers’ Self-reported Productivity, Stress and Indoor Environmental Quality Using Environmental Sensors. In: Chatzigiannakis, I., De Ruyter, B., Mavrommati, I. (eds) Ambient Intelligence. AmI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11912. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34255-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34255-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34254-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34255-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics