Towards Modelling Interventions in Small-Scale Fisheries

Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


Interventions often have unintended effects, particularly when they target outcomes in complex social-ecological systems (SES), such as fisheries. Development agencies strive for ‘doing development differently’, because past efforts have often been unsuccessful. The question then is how to do better. Science can make a major contribution here. Its power lies in synthesising and generalising knowledge embedded in ‘thinking tools’ that enable looking at problems from a complex adaptive systems lens. Our approach is to design an agent-based model to understand and reflect on the impact of different types of development interventions in small-scale fisheries. The model embeds synthesised insights from two small-scale fishery cases and from literature on important (loan and entry–exit) dynamics. In short, by modelling a complex socioecological phenomenon such as fishing and trading in small-scale fisheries, the model aims at enabling scientist and practitioners alike to think differently and thereby to support acting differently.


Social-ecological modelling Fisher behaviour Development 


  1. 1.
    Islam, M.M., Sallu, S., Hubacek, K., Paavola, J.: Limits and barriers to adaptation to climate variability and change in Bangladeshi coastal fishing communities. Mar. Policy. 43, 208–216 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crona, B., Nyström, M., Folke, C., Jiddawi, N.: Middlemen, a critical social-ecological link in coastal communities of Kenya and Zanzibar. Mar. Policy. 34, 761–771 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooks, S.E., Kebede, B., Allison, E.H., Reynolds, J.D.: The balance of power in rural marketing networks: a case study of Snake trading in Cambodia. J. Dev. Stud. 46, 1003–1025 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haque, C.E., Idrobo, C.J., Berkes, F., Giesbrecht, D.: Small-scale fishers’ adaptations to change_ the role of formal and informal credit in Paraty, Brazil. Mar. Policy. 51, 401–407 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chambers, C., Carothers, C.: Thirty years after privatization_ a survey of Icelandic small-boat fishermen. Mar. Policy. 80(1–12), (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Neill, E.D., Crona, B.: Assistance networks in seafood trade – a means to assess benefit distribution in small-scale fisheries. Mar. Policy. 78, 196–205 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muallil, R.N., Geronimo, R.C., Cleland, D., Cabral, R.B., Doctor, M.V., Cruz-Trinidad, A., Aliño, P.M.: Willingness to exit the artisanal fishery as a response to scenarios of declining catch or increasing monetary incentives. Fish. Res. 111, 74–81 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tewfik, A., Andrew, N.L., Béné, C., Garces, L.: Reconciling poverty alleviation with reduction in fisheries capacity: boat aid in post-tsunami Aceh, Indonesia. Fisheries Manage. 15, 147–158 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations