Skip to main content

Understanding the Twitter Usage of Science Citation Index (SCI) Journals

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Libraries at the Crossroads of Digital Information for the Future (ICADL 2019)

Abstract

This paper investigates the Twitter interaction patterns of journals from the Science Citation Index (SCI) of Master Journal List (MJL). A total of 953,253 tweets extracted from 857 journal accounts, were analyzed in this study. Findings indicate that SCI journals interacted more with each other but much less with journals from other citation indices. The network structure of the communication graph resembled a tight crowd network, with Nature journals playing a major part. Information sources such as news portals and scientific organizations were mentioned more in tweets, than academic journal Twitter accounts. Journals with high journal impact factors (JIFs) were found to be prominent hubs in the communication graph. Differences were found between the Twitter usage of SCI journals with Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) journals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Higher resolution image can be viewed at this link https://bit.ly/2KPo8EH.

  2. 2.

    The topics were identified based on the profile description in the Twitter accounts.

References

  1. Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Kwasny, M., Holmes, K.L.: Academic information on Twitter: a user survey. PLoS ONE 13, e0197265 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gardhouse, A.I., Budd, L., Yang, S.Y.C., Wong, C.L.: #GeriMedJC: the Twitter complement to the traditional-format geriatric medicine journal club. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 65, 1347–1351 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Leung, E., Siassakos, D., Khan, K.: Journal club via social media: authors take note of the impact of #BlueJC. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 122, 1042–1044 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan, T.M., et al.: Ten steps for setting up an online journal club. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 35, 148–154 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong, K., Piraquive, J., Levi, J.R.: Social media presence of otolaryngology journals: the past, present, and future. Laryngoscope 128, 363–368 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zheng, H., Aung, H.H., Erdt, M., Peng, T.-Q., Sesagiri Raamkumar, A., Theng, Y.-L.: Social media presence of scholarly journals. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 70, 256–270 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raamkumar, A.S., Erdt, M., Vijayakumar, H., Rasmussen, E., Theng, Y.-L.: Understanding the Twitter usage of humanities and social sciences academic journals. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 55, 430–439 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi : an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: ICWSM, vol. 8, pp. 361–362 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, M.A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., Himelboim, I.: Mapping Twitter topic networks: from polarized crowds to community clusters. Pew Res. Center 20, 1–56 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, M.K., Yoon, H.Y., Smith, M., Park, H.J., Park, H.W.: Mapping a Twitter scholarly communication network: a case of the association of internet researchers’ conference. Scientometrics 112, 767–797 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomson Reuters: Journal Citation Reports (JCR). https://jcr.incites.thomsonreuters.com/

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research project “Altmetrics: Rethinking And Exploring New Ways Of Measuring Research” is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Science of Research, Innovation and Enterprise programme (SRIE Award No. NRF2014-NRF-SRIE001-019).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aravind Sesagiri Raamkumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sesagiri Raamkumar, A., Erdt, M., Vijayakumar, H., Nagarajan, A., Theng, YL. (2019). Understanding the Twitter Usage of Science Citation Index (SCI) Journals. In: Jatowt, A., Maeda, A., Syn, S. (eds) Digital Libraries at the Crossroads of Digital Information for the Future. ICADL 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11853. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34058-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34058-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34057-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34058-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics