Abstract
The way knowledge is shared online is now constantly transforming with the advancement of technology. It is becoming more difficult now to sustain student’s attention in online knowledge sharing environment. Students tend to lose their attention quickly and no motivation to participate in the discussion activities posted by the lecturers. The current interface design is lacking of motivation factor to sustain students’ participation in online knowledge sharing activities. This paper describes design criteria that apply self-determination theory to self-motivate students in online knowledge sharing activities. The design criteria comprises game and social design elements. There are some typical game design elements used in user interface design are such as the points, badges, leaderboard, level, challenge, reward, progression and etc. These game design elements are now widely used in gamification applications. It was found that those design elements can motivate the students in their online knowledge sharing participation. The aim this paper is to provide the design criteria for a motivating user interface design that can promote students’ motivation to share their knowledge online. Previous study had identified a set design criteria based on content validity analysis for designing a motivating user interface. These set of design criteria were designed in a prototype interface called i-Discuss. Our finding reveal that motivation can be designed in user interface for online knowledge sharing activities. Future study will be conducted to evaluate the designed prototype.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Moore, J.L., Dickson-Deane, C., Galyen, K.: e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: are they the same? Internet High. Educ. 14, 129–135 (2011)
Kearsley, G.: Online Education: Learning and Teaching in Cyberspace. Wadsworth, Belmont (2000)
Analoui, B.D., Sambrook, S., Doloriert, C.H.: Engaging students in group work to maximise tacit knowledge sharing and use. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 12, 35–43 (2014)
Hsu, C.-L., Lin, J.C.-C.: Acceptance of blog usage: the roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Inf. Manag. 45, 65–74 (2008)
Ardichvili, A.: Learning and knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice: motivators, barriers, and enablers. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 10, 541–554 (2008)
Dennen, V.P.: Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 1624–1633 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.003
Muilenburg, L.Y., Berge, Z.L.: Student barriers to online learning: a factor analytic study. Distance Educ. 26, 29–48 (2005)
Shoemaker, N.: Can universities encourage students’ continued motivation for knowledge sharing and how can this help organizations? J. Coll. Teach. Learn. 11, 99–114 (2014)
Soller, A., Lesgold, A.: A computational approach to analyzing online knowledge sharing interaction. In: Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 253–260 (2003)
Hanus, M.D., Fox, J.: Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: a longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Comput. Educ. 80, 152–161 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
Raymer, R., Design, E.-L.: Gamification: using game mechanics to enhance elearning. Elearn Mag. 2011, 3 (2011)
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., Sarsa, H.: Does gamification work?–a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3025–3034. IEEE (2014)
Oldfather, P., Dahl, K.: Toward a social constructivist reconceptualization of intrinsic motivation for literacy learning. J. Lit. Res. 26, 139–158 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969409547843
Ramakrisnan, P., Jaafar, A.: Usable, aesthetic, sociable and motivating interface for students’ online knowledge sharing. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2016. LNCS, vol. 9753, pp. 550–561. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_50
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, pp. 9–15. ACM (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575
Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, H., Klevers, M.: Psychological perspectives on motivation through gamification. IxD&A. 19, 28–37 (2013)
Sailer, M., Hense, J.U., Mayr, S.K., Mandl, H.: How gamification motivates: an experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 69, 371–380 (2017)
da Rocha Seixas, L., Gomes, A.S., de Melo Filho, I.J.: Effectiveness of gamification in the engagement of students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 58, 48–63 (2016)
Law, F.L., Kasirun, Z.M., Gan, C.K.: Gamification towards sustainable mobile application. In: 2011 5th Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering, MySEC 2011, pp. 349–353 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/MySEC.2011.6140696
Sicart, M.: Defining game mechanics. Game Stud. 8, 1–14 (2008)
Bunchball Inc.: Gamification 101: An Introduction to the Use of Game Dynamics to Influence Behavior. Bunchball white Pap. 14 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020
Muntean, C.I.: Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. In: Proceedings 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL, pp. 323–329 (2011)
Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T., Korhonen, A.: The effect of achievement badges on students’ behavior: an empirical study in a university-level computer science course. IJET 10, 18–29 (2015)
Kuo, M.-S., Chuang, T.-Y.: How gamification motivates visits and engagement for online academic dissemination–an empirical study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 16–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.025
Zichermann, G., Cunningham, C.: Gamification by Design: Implementing Game Mechanics in Web and Mobile Apps. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Newton (2011)
Wang, S., Noe, R.A.: Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 20, 115–131 (2010)
Sharratt, M., Usoro, A.: Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electron. J. Knowl. Manag. 1, 187–196 (2003)
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Nagata, A.: A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Ind. Corp. Chang. 9, 1–20 (2000)
Phang, C.W., Kankanhalli, A., Sabherwal, R.: Usability and sociability in online communities: a comparative study of knowledge seeking and contribution. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10, 721–747 (2009)
Nonnecke, B., Preece, J.: Lurker demographics: counting the silent. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 73–80. ACM (2000)
Smith, M.A., Kollock, P.: Communities in Cyberspace. Psychology Press, Abingdon (1999)
Preece, J., Shneiderman, B.: The reader-to-leader framework: motivating technology-mediated social participation. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, 13–32 (2009)
Eppler, M.J.: A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Inf. Vis. 5, 202–210 (2006)
Ma, W.W.K., Yuen, A.H.K.: Understanding online knowledge sharing: an interpersonal relationship perspective. Comput. Educ. 56, 210–219 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.004
Mirvis, P.H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Csikzentmihaly, M.: Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Acad. Manag. Rev. 16, 636–640 (1991). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1991.4279513
House, R.J.: A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Adm. Sci. Q. 16, 321–339 (1971). https://doi.org/10.2307/2391905
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Overview of self-determination theory: an organismic dialectical perspective. Handb. Self-Determ. Res., 3–33 (2002)
Mallasi, H., Ainin, S.: Investigating knowledge sharing behaviour in academic environment. J. Organ. Knowl. Manag. 2015, 1–20 (2015)
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Gijselaers, W.: Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 285–292 (2013)
Shi, L., Cristea, A.I., Hadzidedic, S., Dervishalidovic, N.: Contextual gamification of social interaction: towards increasing motivation in social e-learning (2014)
Deci, E.L.: Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 18, 105 (1971)
Weidinger, A.F., Spinath, B., Steinmayr, R.: Why does intrinsic motivation decline following negative feedback? the mediating role of ability self-concept and its moderation by goal orientations. Learn. Individ. Differ. 47, 117–128 (2016)
Goldhaber, Tanya S., Langdon, Patrick M., Clarkson, P.John: Designing intrinsically motivating user interfaces for the ageing population. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2013. LNCS, vol. 8010, pp. 68–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39191-0_8
Banfield, J., Wilkerson, B.: Increasing student intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy through gamification pedagogy. Contemp. Issues Educ. Res. 7, 291 (2014)
Wilson, D., Calongne, C., Henderson, S.B.: Gamification challenges and a case study in online learning. Internet Learn. 4, 8 (2015)
Mekler, E.D., Brühlmann, F., Opwis, K., Tuch, A.N.: Do points, levels and leaderboards harm intrinsic motivation?: an empirical analysis of common gamification elements. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on gameful design, research, and applications, pp. 66–73. ACM (2013)
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Handbook of Self-determination Research. University Rochester Press, Rochester (2002)
Deterding, S.: Situated motivational affordances of game elements: a conceptual model. In: Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts, a workshop at CHI (2011)
Zhang, P.: Technical opinion Motivational affordances: reasons for ICT design and use. Commun. ACM 51, 145–147 (2008)
Ramakrisnan, P., Jaafar, A.: Motivation design methodology for online knowledge sharing interface. In: Badioze Zaman, H., et al. (eds.) Advances in Visual Informatics. IVIC 2017 Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10645, pp. 224–232. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70010-6_21
O’Brolcháin, F., Jacquemard, T., Monaghan, D., O’Connor, N., Novitzky, P., Gordijn, B.: The convergence of virtual reality and social networks: threats to privacy and autonomy. Sci. Eng. Ethics 22, 1–29 (2016)
Brophy, J.E.: Motivating Students to Learn. Routledge, Abingdon (2013)
Berger, V., Schrader, U.: Fostering sustainable nutrition behavior through gamification. Sustainability 8, 67 (2016)
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation. Wiley, Hoboken (1975)
Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., Gonçalves, D.: Engaging engineering students with gamification. In: 2013 5th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ramakrisnan, P. (2019). Gamifying Online Knowledge Sharing Environment: A Motivating User Interface Design. In: Badioze Zaman, H., et al. Advances in Visual Informatics. IVIC 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11870. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34032-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34032-2_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-34031-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-34032-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)