Advertisement

Month-Long, In-Home Socially Assistive Robot for Children with Diverse Needs

  • Caitlyn ClabaughEmail author
  • Shomik Jain
  • Balasubramanian Thiagarajan
  • Zhonghao Shi
  • Leena Mathur
  • Kartik Mahajan
  • Gisele Ragusa
  • Maja Matarić
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics book series (SPAR, volume 11)

Abstract

Socially assistive robotics (SAR) has the potential to close the gap between need and access to individualized, longitudinal support for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) that supplements and augments that of therapist, clinicians, and other caregivers. To this end, we developed a fully autonomous SAR system designed for month-long, in-home interventions with children with ASD. In this paper, we investigate a single case study with two siblings; one is typically developing and the other is affected by ASD. To better understand their help-seeking behaviors and engagement patterns, we define and analyze measures of participants’ attentiveness. Our analysis shows that there are strong correlations between attentiveness and challenge level for both participants. We discuss how attentiveness can be used to optimize challenge level, detect help-seeking behaviors, and improve robot feedback for individuals with diverse needs.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Science Foundation grant IIS-1139148.

Disclosure. Co-author Maja Matarić is co-founder and chief science officer of Embodied, Inc.

References

  1. 1.
    Baio, J., Wiggins, L., Christensen, D.L., Maenner, M.J., Daniels, J., Warren, Z., Kurzius-Spencer, M., Zahorodny, W., Rosenberg, C.R., White, T., et al.: Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years-autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, united states, 2014. MMWR Surveill. Summ. 67(6), 1 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clabaugh, C., Ragusa, G., Sha, F., Matarić, M.J.: Designing a socially assistive robot for personalized number concepts learning in preschool children. In: Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics (ICDL-EpiRob), pp. 314–319. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clabaugh, C., Ram, T.,  Matarić, M.J.: Estimating visual focus of attention in dyadic human-robot interaction for planar tasks. In: International Conference on Social Robotics (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clabaugh, C., Becerra, D., Deng, E., Ragusa, G., Matarić, M.J.: Month-long, in-home case study of a socially assistive robot for children with autism spectrum disorder. In: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 87–88. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dautenhahn, K.: Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of autism. In: Proceedings CT99, The Third International Cognitive Technology Conference, August, San Francisco, vol. 359, p. 374 (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feil-Seifer, D., Matarić, M.J.: Defining socially assistive robotics. In: 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2005, pp. 465–468. IEEE (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, E.S., Berkovits, L.D., Bernier, E.P., Leyzberg, D., Shic, F., Paul, R., Scassellati, B.: Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43(5), 1038–1049 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lavelle, T.A., Weinstein, M.C., Newhouse, J.P., Munir, K., Kuhlthau, K.A., Prosser, L.A.: Economic burden of childhood autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics 133(3), e520–e529 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Odom, S.L., Brown, W.H., Frey, T., Karasu, N., Lee Smith-Canter, L., Strain, P.S.: Evidence-based practices for young children with autism: contributions for single-subject design research. Focus Autism. Dev. Dis. 18(3), 166–175 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ospina, M.B., Seida, J.K., Clark, B., Karkhaneh, M., Hartling, L., Tjosvold, L., Vandermeer, B., Smith, V.: Behavioural and developmental interventions for autism spectrum disorder: a clinical systematic review. PloS One 3(11), e3755 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Te Boekhorst, R., Billard, A.: Robotic assistants in therapy and education of children with autism: can a small humanoid robot help encourage social interaction skills? Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 4(2), 105–120 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., Matarić, M.: Robots for use in autism research. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 275–294 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Short, E., Short, D., Fu, Y., Matarić, M.J.: Sprite: Stewart platform robot for interactive tabletop engagement, Tech. rep., Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wechsler, D.: Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, 2nd edn. Psychological Corporation, San Antonio (1989)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    White, S.W., Keonig, K., Scahill, L.: Social skills development in children with autism spectrum disorders: a review of the intervention research. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 37(10), 1858–1868 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caitlyn Clabaugh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shomik Jain
    • 1
  • Balasubramanian Thiagarajan
    • 1
  • Zhonghao Shi
    • 1
  • Leena Mathur
    • 1
  • Kartik Mahajan
    • 1
  • Gisele Ragusa
    • 1
  • Maja Matarić
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations