Advertisement

The Story We Cannot See: On How a Retelling Relates to Its Afterstory

  • Bjarke Alexander LarsenEmail author
  • Luis Emilio Bruni
  • Henrik Schoenau-Fog
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11869)

Abstract

The field of Emergent Narrative in digital narrative studies has seen a lot of research since its inception in 1999, and a lot of it is helpful, but also there has been confusion in terms and a lack of focus on the specifics of how the narrative is shaped in the mind of the player. The term itself has been used to both describe the ensuing field, the concept, the process, and the resulting narrative experience. This paper aims to clarify these misunderstandings by investigating the field and defining the term “afterstory” to help solidify the relationship between the differing aspects of Emergent Narrative. Afterstory is specifically defined as the virtual, mental story that exists in the player’s mind after play and informed by the interactions and their perspective on them. Then, using previous work on retellings, the paper will relate afterstory to how people retell their afterstories, and what we can use those retellings for in relation to the system that helped form them. In conclusion, some examples will be brought forth that showcase the difficult nature of extrapolating a retelling’s quality to its interactive narrative system’s quality, but how it can still be done with careful, purposeful analysis.

Keywords

Emergent Narrative Afterstory Interactive Digital Narrative Emergent storytelling Storyworld Retelling 

References

  1. 1.
    Abbott, H.P.: Story, plot, and narration. In: Herman, D. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. Cambridge Companions to Literature, p. 39–51. Cambridge University Press (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521856965.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aylett, R.: Narrative in virtual environments-towards emergent narrative. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Narrative Intelligence, pp. 83–86 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Bruni, L.E., Baceviciute, S.: Narrative intelligibility and closure in interactive systems. In: Koenitz, H., Sezen, T.I., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., C̨atak, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8230, pp. 13–24. Springer, Cham (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02756-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    CCP Games: Eve Online (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tiburon, E.A., Sports, E.A.: NFL Madden 25 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eladhari, M.P.: Re-Tellings: the fourth layer of narrative as an instrument for critique. In: Rouse, R., Koenitz, H., Haahr, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11318, pp. 65–78. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galyean III, T.A.: Narrative guidance of interactivity. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Groen, A.: Empires of Eve. Self published (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jenkins, H.: Game design as narrative architecture. In: The Game Design Reader: A Rules of Play Anthology, chapter 4, pp. 118–130. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koenitz, H.: Towards a theoretical framework for interactive digital narrative. In: Aylett, R., Lim, M.Y., Louchart, S., Petta, P., Riedl, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6432, pp. 176–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16638-9_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koenitz, H.: Towards a specific theory of interactive digital narrative. In: Interactive Digital Narrative, pp. 107–121. Routledge (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larsen, B.A.: The narrative quality of games and play. Master’s thesis, Aalborg University, CPH (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Larsen, B.A., Schoenau-Fog, H.: The narrative quality of game mechanics. In: Nack, F., Gordon, A.S. (eds.) ICIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10045, pp. 61–72. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48279-8_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Linden Lab: Second Life (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.: The emergent narrative theoretical investigation. In: the 2004 Conference on Narrative and Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 21–28 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.: Narrative theory and emergent interactive narrative. Int. J. Contin. Eng. Educ. Life Learn. 14(6), 506–518 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Louchart, S., Swartjes, I., Kriegel, M., Aylett, R.: Purposeful authoring for emergent narrative. In: Spierling, U., Szilas, N. (eds.) ICIDS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5334, pp. 273–284. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89454-4_35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Louchart, S., Truesdale, J., Suttie, N., Aylett, R.: Emergent narrative, past, present and future of an interactive storytelling approach. In: Interactive Digital Narrative: History, Theory and Practice, pp. 185–199. Routledge (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Montfort, N.: Twisty Little Passages: An Approach to Interactive Fiction. MIT Press (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murnane, E.: Emergent narrative: stories of play, playing with stories. Ph.D. thesis, University of Central Florida (2018)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ringer, C., Nicolaou, M.A.: Deep unsupervised multi-view detection of video game stream highlights. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, p. 15. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ryan, J.: Curating simulated storyworlds. Ph.D. thesis, UC Santa Cruz (2018)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ryan, J.O., Mateas, M., Wardrip-Fruin, N.: Open design challenges for interactive emergent narrative. In: Schoenau-Fog, H., Bruni, L.E., Louchart, S., Baceviciute, S. (eds.) ICIDS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9445, pp. 14–26. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27036-4_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ryan, M.L.: Avatars of Story. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Suttie, N., Louchart, S., Aylett, R., Lim, T.: Theoretical considerations towards authoring emergent narrative. In: Koenitz, H., Sezen, T.I., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., C̨atak, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8230, pp. 205–216. Springer, Cham (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02756-2_25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Swartjes, I.M.T.: Whose story is it anyway? How improv informs agency and authorship of emergent narrative. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Various: The Boatmurdered Let’s Play Archive. all entries archived at (2006). https://lparchive.org/Dwarf-Fortress-Boatmurdered/
  30. 30.
    Walsh, R.: Emergent narrative in interactive media. Narrative 19(1), 72–85 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bjarke Alexander Larsen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luis Emilio Bruni
    • 1
  • Henrik Schoenau-Fog
    • 1
  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations