Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of PISA Studies on Education Policy in a Democratic Perspective: The Implementation of National Tests in Denmark

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education

Part of the book series: Global Histories of Education ((GHE))

Abstract

Educational assessments always reflect the values and power of those with access to influence educational tools and strongly affect the practices to which they belong. Depending on their form and use, assessments can also influence teachers’ pedagogy and activities in classroom settings. As analyzed by sociologists such as Bourdieu, such an influence occurs in implicit ways. Assessments thus largely form a practice by which power can be expressed and exercised, but in ways that are mostly invisible, and which could therefore compromise democratic principles. This chapter considers how the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) can strongly affect local national educational policy and practice. Since these processes largely occur without being explicitly expressed or addressed by politicians, one can ask whether PISA and its corresponding practice can be considered a challenge to democracy and democratic processes. Denmark is an interesting context for investigating this problem and is used as a case and example. The insights from the Danish case are discussed more generally in relation to other countries and education systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All translations of research literature and primary sources from Danish to English used in this chapter were produced by the author unless otherwise stated.

References

  • Allerup, P. (2018). PISA’s metoder – et ambitiøst projekt, der ikke virkede efter hensigten. In D. Sommer & J. Klitmøller (Eds.), Hinsides PISA – nordiske perspektiver på uddannelse (pp. 107–134). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, K. E., & Kousholt, K. (2015). De nationale test som ny praksis i den danske folkeskole: Betydninger i klassens sociale fællesskab. In K. E. Andreasen, M. Buchardt, A. Rasmussen, & C. Ydesen (Eds.), Test og prøvelser: Oprindelse, udvikling, aktualitet (pp. 29–49). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, A. M., Egelund, N., Jensen, T. P., Krone, M., Lindenskov, L., & Mejding, J. (2001). Forventninger og færdigheder – Danske unge i international sammenligning. [Expectations and skills – Danish Youth in an international comparison]. Copenhagen. Denmark. AKF, DPU and SFI Survey. (The Danish PISA 2000 report, in Danish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Beyond learning. Democratic education for a human future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2007). ‘Don’t count me in’. Democracy, education and the question of inclusion. Nordisk Pedagogik, 27, 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society: Education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1996). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance. OECD education working papers, no. 71. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9fdfqffr28-en. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/the-policy-impact-of-pisa_5k9fdfqffr28-en.

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., Jansen, M., & Löb, M. (1981). Hvor godt læser og staver børn i dag? – om læsning og retstavning i folkeskolens danskundervisning: processer, standpunkter, vilkår, problemstillinger. Working paper. Copenhagen: Det Centrale Uddannelsesråd, Modersmålsopgaven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grek, S., & Ydesen, C. (2021). Paving the way for PISA – The OECD’s International Education Indicators Project (INES). Globalisation, Societies and Education (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, R. L. (2012). What did you learn in school today? How ideas mattered for policy changes in Danish and Swedish schools 1990–2011. Aarhus: Forlaget Politica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarder, B. (2005a). L 101 Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen. (Styrket evaluering og anvendelse af nationale test som pædagogisk redskab samt obligatoriske prøver m.v.). Folketinget. Resume. Uddannelsesudvalget, fremsat Oct. 10th 2005. Retrieved February 17, 2019, from https://www.ft.dk/samling/20051/lovforslag/L101/index.htm.

  • Haarder, B. (2005b). Fremsættelsestale. L 101 Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen. (Styrket evaluering og anvendelse af nationale test som pædagogisk redskab samt obligatoriske prøver m.v.). Undervisningsministeriet. Uddannelsesudvalget. October 7, 2005. Retrieved February 17, 2019, from https://www.ft.dk/samling/20051/lovforslag/l101/20051_l101_fremsaettelsestale.htm.

  • Held, D. (1987/1996). Models of democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningsen, I., & Allerup, P. (2017). Pisa – matematik: holdninger og fakta. Samsoe: Forlaget Matematik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2014). Analyses of model fit and robustness. A new look at the PISA scaling model underlying ranking of countries according to reading literacy. Psychometrika, 79(2), 210–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, M., & Grek, S. (2012). Europeanizing education. Governing a new policy space. Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. D. (2018). Education by the numbers and the making of society: The expertise of international assessments. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, U. (2011). PISA as a political instrument: One history behind the formulating of the PISA programme. In M. A. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 17–30). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mejding, J. (1994). Den grimme ælling og svanerne? – Om danske elevers læsefærdigheder. Copenhagen: Danmarks Pædagogiske Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (2013). PISA and the globalization of education governance: Some puzzles and problems. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 9–26). Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. (2007). OECD programme for international student assessment: Unraveling a knowledge network. Ottawa, ON: School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000. Paris, France: OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Historical summary of CERI’s main activities. OECD. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/50234306.pdf.

  • OECD. (2017). OECD handbook for internationally comparative education statistics: Concepts, standards, definitions and classifications. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264279889-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2018). PISA results 2015 in focus. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019). OECD Centre for educational research and innovation. OECD. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from http://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/brochure.pdf.

  • Papadopoulos, G. S. (1994). Education 1960–1990: The OECD perspective. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereyra, M. A., Kotthoff, H.-H., & Cowen, R. (2011). PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. In M. A. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 1–14). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. (2011). PISA: Numbers, standardizing conduct, and the alchemy of school subjects. In M. A. Pereyra, H.-G. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 31–46). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Regeringen. (2004). Modernisering af prøver, eksamener og karakterer. [Modernization of assessments, exams and grades]. Undervisningsministeriet Copenhagen, Denmark [Danish Ministry of Education].

    Google Scholar 

  • Regeringen. (2010). Danmark 2020. Viden>Vækst>Vekstand>Velfærd. Statsministeriet. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from http://www.stm.dk/multimedia/Danmark_2020_Viden__v_kst__velstand__velf_rd.pdf.

  • Shewbridge, C., Jang, E., Matthews, P., & Santiago, P. (2011). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education. DENMARK. OECD. Retrieved February 15, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/denmark/47696663.pdf.

  • Sjøberg, S. (2016). OECD, PISA, and globalization: The influence of the international assessment regime. In C. H. Tienken & C. A. Mullen (Eds.), Education policy perils. Tackling the tough issues (pp. 102–133). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. H. (2015). Economization of education: Human capital, global corporations, skills-based schooling. New York; London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Undervisningsministeriet. (2004a). Betænkning om indførelse af en ny karakterskala til erstatning af 13-skalaen. Bidrag afgivet af karakterkommissionen, November 2004. Undervisningsministeriet, Uddannelsesstyrelsen. [Report on a new grading Scale to replace the 13-step scale. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Education].

    Google Scholar 

  • Undervisningsministeriet. (2004b). OECD-rapport om grundskolen i Danmark – 2004. Uddannelsesstyrelsens temahæfteserie no. 5, 2004. Undervisningsministeriets Forlag. [OECD Report on the Danish public School – 2004. Publication No. 5, 2004. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Education].

    Google Scholar 

  • Undervisningsministeriet. (2006). Lov om ændring af lov om folkeskolen (Styrket evaluering og anvendelse af nationale test som pædagogisk redskab samt obligatoriske prøver m.v.). [Law about changes to the Act of the Folkeskole, Act no. 313 of 19/04/2006].

    Google Scholar 

  • Undervisningsministeriet. (2017). Lempelse af bindinger i regelsættet om Fælles Mål. Undervisningsministeriet. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from https://uvm.dk/folkeskolen/fag-timetal-og-overgange/faelles-maal/lempelse-af-faelles-maal/lempelse-af-bindinger-i-regelsaettet-om-faelles-maal.

  • UNESCO. (1945). Constitution of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), 16 November 1945. Retrieved April 29, 2019, from http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ddb73094.html.

  • Ydesen, C. (2014). High-stakes educational testing and democracy – antagonistic or symbiotic relationship? Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 9(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197914520646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ydesen, C., & Andreasen, K. E. (2014). Accountability practices in the history of Danish primary: Public education from the 1660s to the present. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(120), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Culture and Learning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Karen Egedal Andreasen

Authors
  1. Karen Egedal Andreasen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Egedal Andreasen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Culture and Learning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Christian Ydesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Andreasen, K.E. (2019). The Impact of PISA Studies on Education Policy in a Democratic Perspective: The Implementation of National Tests in Denmark. In: Ydesen, C. (eds) The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education. Global Histories of Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33798-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33799-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation