Abstract
This chapter traces the recent history of Brazilian connections with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) related to public education, with an analytical focus on the National Institute of Educational Research (INEP), which has been serving as the hub for OECD-Brazil relations in education. While the OECD has a long history of promoting educational guidelines, assessments, and standards worldwide, it was only in the last decade of the twentieth century that Brazil strengthened its collaboration with the organization in this area. In 1997, Brazil joined the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)/OECD World Education Indicators Programme; in 1999, Brazil started to appear as a non-member in the OECD Education at a Glance reports; and Brazil took part in the very first round of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) in 2000. Based on interviews with key agents and the archival sources generated by early OECD-Brazil connections, the chapter seeks to contribute to our understanding of the significance and modus operandi of these interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Brazil was invited to participate as a non-member of several OECD committees during the 1990s as part of an approximation policy of the organization and became full member of OECD Development Center in 1995. Themes included science, technology, environment, commerce, taxes, public finance, and public management, among others (Souza Pinto 2000).
- 2.
PISA Video Series available at http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/strongperformers/.
References
Documents
Brazilian Federal Government. (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Retrieved January 25, 2019, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.htm.
Brazilian Federal Government. (1996). Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação (Law on the Guidelines and Bases of National Education). Law 9394/1996. Retrieved January 25, 2019, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L9394.htm.
Brazilian Federal Government. (1997). Social and political mobilization of education for all – The Brazilian experience. Brasilia: MEC.
Brazilian Federal Government. Ministério da Educação. Instituto nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais (INEP). Nota metodológica sobre a compatibilização de desempenhos do Pisa com a escala do Saeb. Brasília, DF: MEC/INEP, 2009. Disponível em. Retrieved from http://download.inep.gov.br/educacao_basica/portal_ideb/o_que_sao_as_metas/Nota_Tecnica_n3_compatibilizacao_PISA_SAEB.pdf.
Brazilian Federal Government. (2014). Plano Nacional de Educação. LEI N° 13.005/2014.
Cardoso, F. H. (1994 [2008]). Mãos à obra, Brasil: proposta de governo [online]. Rio de Janeiro: Centro Edelstein de Pesquisa Social, 2008. 131 p. ISBN: 978-85-99662-66-3. Available from SciELO Books.
Castro, M. H. G. (1999). Education for the 21st century the challenge of quality and equity. Brasília: MEC/INEP.
Castro, M. H. G. (2000). A participação do Brasil em estudos e avaliações educacionais comparados internacionais. Published by Brazilian Federal Government, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Folha de São Paulo. (1996). Pesquisa exibe quadro desastroso. 01/05/1996, p. 1. Retrieved from the digital archive https://acervo.folha.com.br.
Folha de São Paulo. (1998). 1 universitário vale 10 alunos do primeiro grau. São Paulo, 24/11/1998. Retrieved from the digital archive https://acervo.folha.com.br.
Folha de São Paulo. (2001). Brasil é o último em prova de matemática. 08/12/2001 p. C6. Retrieved from the digital archive https://acervo.folha.com.br.
INEP. SEMINÁRIO INTERNACIONAL DE AVALIAÇÃO EDUCACIONAL, 1° a 3 de dezembro de 1997. Anais… Brasília: MEC, Inep, Unesco, 1998. pp. 9–11.
Souza, P. R. (1998). Education & Development in Latin America. Speech minute. International Seminar on Development Models and Policies. June 1998. BNDES. Rio de Janeiro. (Fernando Henrique Institute Archive. Paulo Renato Fund 01-0009092-001).
Souza, P. R. (2001). Conquistas e desafios da educação. Folha de São Paulo, 15/04/2001.
Interviews
Almeida, I. C. (2018). Statistician at INEP (1997–2003). (G. T. Silva, Interviewer).
Castro, M. H. G. (2018). President of INEP (1995–2002), Secretary of Education of the State of São Paulo (2007–2009), Executive Secretary of the Brazlian Ministry of Education (2016–2018), Vice-Chair of PISA governing board (2018). (G. T. Silva, Interviewer).
Fini, M. I. (2018). President of INEP (2016–2019), Coordinator of INEP´s Department of Assessment of Basic Education (1996–2002). (G. T. Silva, Interviewer).
Sampaio, C. E. M. (2018). Statistician and Director of Educational Statistics at INEP (1985–). (G. T. Silva, Interviewer).
Souza, P. R. (1995). Ministry of Education (1995–2003). (Roda Viva Interview. Aired by TV Cultura in 9/10/1995. Transcript available at Memoria Roda Viva Fapesp. Retrieved February 27, 2019, from http://www.rodaviva.fapesp.br/materia_busca/536/entrevistados/paulo_renato_de_souza_1995.htm.
Literature
Abrucio, F. (2007). Trajetória recente da gestão pública brasileira: um balanço crítico e a renovação da agenda de reformas. Revista de Administração Pública (41), 67–86 Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Abrucio, F. L. (2010). A dinâmica federativa da educação brasileira: diagnóstico e propostas de aperfeiçoamento. Educação e federalismo no Brasil: combater as desigualdades, garantir a diversidade. Brasília: UNESCO, 2010, 01–29.
Acosta, F., & Ruiz, G. R. (2018). Revisiting comparative education in Latin America: Traditions, uses, and perspectives. Comparative Education, 54(1), 62–76.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bernussi, M. (2014). Instituições internacionais e educação: a agenda do Banco Mundial e do Education for All no caso brasileiro. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidade de São Paulo.
Bonamino, A., & Franco, C. (2013). Avaliação e política educacional: o processo de institucionalização do SAEB. Cadernos de pesquisa, 108, 101–132.
Bonamino, A., & Sousa, S. (2012). Three generations of assessments of basic education in Brazil: Interfaces with the curriculum in/of the school. Educação e Pesquisa, 38(2), 373–388.
Coelho, M. I. (2008). Vinte anos de avaliação da educação básica no Brasil: aprendizagens e desafios. Ensaio: Avaliação e políticas públicas em Educação, 16(59), 229–258.
Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1989). The wonderland of public administration reforms. Organization Studies, 10(4), 531–548.
Dewey, J. (1998). Search for the public. [1927]. Em Hickman e Alexander (Eds.), The essential Dewey (Vol. 1). Indiana University Press.
Dubois, V. (2009). L’action publique. Cohen (A.), Lacroix (B.), Riutort (Ph.) dir. Nouveau manuel descience politique, La Découverte, 311–325.
Farah, M. F. S. (2008). Disseminação de inovações e políticas públicas e espaço local. Organizações & Sociedade, 15(45), 107–126.
Kauko, J., Centeno, V. G., Candido, H., Shiroma, E., & Klutas, A. (2016). The emergence of quality assessment in Brazilian basic education. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 558–579.
Latour, B. (2005). From realpolitik to dingpolitik. In Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy, 1444.
Leigh Star, S. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.
Marres, N. (2005). Issues spark a public into being: A key but often forgotten point of the Lippmann-Dewey debate. In Weibel and Latour Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 208–217).
Marres, N. (2007). The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759–780.
Mitchell, T. (1999). Society, economy, and the state effect. In State/culture: State-formation after the cultural turn, 76, 90.
Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74–89). Sociological Review. Monographs. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Neto, J. L. H. (2007). Um olhar retrospectivo da avaliação externa no Brasil: das primeiras medições en educação. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación. no. 42/5.
Segatto, C. I., & Abrucio, F. L. (2017). A gestão por resultados na educação em quatro estados brasileiros.
Simielli, L. E. R. (2008). Coalizões em educação no Brasil: a pluralização da sociedade civil na luta pela melhoria da educação pública. Doctoral dissertation.
Souza Pinto, D. F. (2000). OCDE: uma visão brasileira. Instituto Rio Branco.
Spink, P. (2016). The public action languages approach to public affairs. Cadernos de Gestao Publica e Cidadania, 21(70), 162–178.
Spink, P., & Silva, G. (2014, July). Beyond policy: Public action languages and governance from a Brazilian Perspective. In 23rd world congress of political science, Montreal, Canada.
Villani, M., & Oliveira, D. A. (2018). Avaliação Nacional e Internacional no Brasil: os vínculos entre o PISA eo IDEB. Educação & Realidade, 43(4), 1343–1362.
Ydesen, C., & Castro, H. R. (2016). The historical confluence of education for international understanding and textbook revisions in Brazil, 1945–1960. In A. Kulnazarova & C. Ydesen (Eds.), UNESCO without borders: Educational campaigns for international understanding. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Silva, G.T. (2019). International Cooperation from the Perspective of INEP Agents: The OECD and Brazilian Public Education, 1996–2006. In: Ydesen, C. (eds) The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education. Global Histories of Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33799-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33798-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33799-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)