Abstract
Behaviour support technology assists people in organising their daily activities and changing their behaviour. A fundamental notion underlying such supportive technology is that of compliance with behavioural norms: do people indeed perform the desired behaviour? Existing technology employs a rigid implementation of compliance: a norm is either satisfied or not. In practice however, behaviour change norms are less strict: E.g., is a new norm to do sports at least three times a week complied with if it is occasionally only done twice a week? To address this, in this paper we formally specify probabilistic norms through a variant of feature diagrams, enabling a hierarchical decomposition of the desired behaviour and its execution frequencies. Further, we define a new notion of probabilistic norm compliance using a formal hypothesis testing framework. We show that probabilistic norm compliance can be used in a real-world setting by implementing and evaluating our semantics with respect to an existing daily behaviour dataset.
This work is partially financed by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) under the research programmes CoreSAEP (639.022.416), SEQUOIA (15474) and StepUp (628.010.006), as well as by the EU under the project 102112 SUCCESS.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options




Notes
- 1.
Note that we need to use the infimum here instead of the minimum, since the interval might be left-open.
- 2.
At least when this frequency is a point. However also in case of an interval we need to ask whether it is justified to conclude (non-)compliance if the observed behaviour frequency is close to the edges of the interval.
- 3.
Note that we will have \(l< 0 < u\), so the intervals are indeed sound.
- 4.
The code is available from GitHub repository [20].
References
Albrecht, S.V., Ramamoorthy, S.: Are you doing what i think you are doing? criticising uncertain agent models. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Arlington, Virginia, United States, UAI 2015, pp. 52–61. AUAI Press (2015)
Andrighetto, G., Governatori, G., Noriega, P., van der Torre, L. (eds.) Normative Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 4 of Dagstuhl Follow-Ups. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2013)
Cheung, L., Stoelinga, M., Vaandrager, F.W.: A testing scenario for probabilistic processes. J. ACM 54(6), 29 (2007)
Gerhold, M., Stoelinga, M.: Model-based testing of probabilistic systems. Formal Asp. Comput. 30(1), 77–106 (2018)
Hull, C.L.: Principles of Behavior: An Introduction to Behavior Theory. Appleton-Century, New York (1943)
Kließ, M.S., Jonker, C.M., van Riemsdijk, M.B.A.: Temporal logic for modelling activities of daily living. In: Alechina, N., Nørvåg, K., Penczek, W. (eds.) 25th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2018, vol. 120 of Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), pp. 17:1–17:15. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2018)
Oinas-Kukkonen, Harri: Behavior change support systems: a research model and agenda. In: Ploug, Thomas, Hasle, Per, Oinas-Kukkonen, Harri (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 4–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_3
Pasotti, P., Jonker, C.M., van Riemsdijk, M.B.: Action identification hierarchies for behaviour support agents. In: Third Workshop on Cognitive Knowledge Acquisition and Applications, Cognitum 2017 at IJCAI 2017 (2017)
Pasotti, P., van Riemsdijk, M.B., Jonker, C.M.: Representing human habits: towards a habit support agent. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Normative Multiagent Systems, NorMAS 2016 (2016)
Reijsbergen, D., de Boer, P.-T., Scheinhardt, W., Haverkort, B.: On hypothesis testing for statistical model checking. Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transfer 17(4), 377–395 (2015)
Schobbens, P., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.: Feature diagrams: a survey and a formal semantics. In: 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE 2006, pp. 139–148, September 2006
Shafti, Leila S., Haya, Pablo Alfonso, García-Herranz, Manuel, Alamán, Xavier: Personal ambient intelligent reminder for people with cognitive disabilities. In: Bravo, José, Hervás, Ramón, Rodríguez, Marcela (eds.) IWAAL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7657, pp. 383–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35395-6_52
Sun, J., Zhang, H., Fang, Y., Wang, L.H.: Formal semantics and verification for feature modeling. In: 10th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, ICECCS 2005. IEEE, pp. 303–312 (2005)
Sztyler, T.T, Carmona, J.J.: Activities of daily living of several individuals (2015). https://data.4tu.nl/repository/uuid:01eaba9f-d3ed-4e04-9945-b8b302764176
ter Beek, M.H., Legay, A., Lafuente, A.L., Vandin, A.: Statistical analysis of probabilistic models of software product lines with quantitative constraints. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line, SPLC 2015, New York, NY, USA, pp. 11–15. ACM (2015)
Thangarajah, J., Padgham, L., Winikoff, M.: Detecting & exploiting positive goal interaction in intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2003, pp. 401–408. ACM (2003)
Tielman, M.L., Jonker, C.M., van Riemsdijk, M.B.: What should i do? deriving norms from actions, values and context. In: Cassens, J., Wegener, R., Kofod-Petersen, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop Modelling and Reasoning in Context, MRC 2018, no. 2134, pp. 35–40. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (2018)
Vallacher, R.R., Wegner, D.M.: What do people think they’re doing? action identification and human behavior. Psychol. Rev. 94(1), 3–15 (1987)
van Riemsdijk, M.B., Jonker, C.M., Lesser, V.: Creating socially adaptive electronic partners: interaction, reasoning and ethical challenges. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2015, pp. 1201–1206. IFAAMAS (2015)
van Riemsdijk, M.B.: Feature diagrams for behaviour support agents in Grakn. https://github.com/mbirna/feature-diagrams-grakn (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kließ, M.S., Stoelinga, M., van Riemsdijk, M.B. (2019). From Good Intentions to Behaviour Change. In: Baldoni, M., Dastani, M., Liao, B., Sakurai, Y., Zalila Wenkstern, R. (eds) PRIMA 2019: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11873. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33792-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33792-6_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33791-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33792-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)