Epistemic Uncertainty Sampling
- 677 Downloads
Various strategies for active learning have been proposed in the machine learning literature. In uncertainty sampling, which is among the most popular approaches, the active learner sequentially queries the label of those instances for which its current prediction is maximally uncertain. The predictions as well as the measures used to quantify the degree of uncertainty, such as entropy, are almost exclusively of a probabilistic nature. In this paper, we advocate a distinction between two different types of uncertainty, referred to as epistemic and aleatoric, in the context of active learning. Roughly speaking, these notions capture the reducible and the irreducible part of the total uncertainty in a prediction, respectively. We conjecture that, in uncertainty sampling, the usefulness of an instance is better reflected by its epistemic than by its aleatoric uncertainty. This leads us to suggest the principle of “epistemic uncertainty sampling”, which we instantiate by means of a concrete approach for measuring epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. In experimental studies, epistemic uncertainty sampling does indeed show promising performance.
KeywordsActive learning Uncertainty sampling Epistemic uncertainty Aleatoric uncertainty
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the French National Agency for Research (Labex MS2T).
- 1.Antonucci, A., Corani, G., Gabaglio, S.: Active learning by the naive credal classifier. In: Proceedings of the Sixth European Workshop on Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGM), pp. 3–10 (2012)Google Scholar
- 4.Chapelle, O.: Active learning for Parzen window classifier. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), vol. 5, pp. 49–56 (2005)Google Scholar
- 7.Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J., Franklin, J.: The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Math. Intelligencer 27(2), 83–85 (2005)Google Scholar
- 9.Kendall, A., Gal, Y.: What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? In: Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (2017)Google Scholar
- 13.Nguyen, V.L., Destercke, S., Masson, M.H., Hüllermeier, E.: Reliable multi-class classification based on pairwise epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 5089–5095. AAAI Press (2018)Google Scholar
- 15.Philip, E., Elizabeth, W.: Sequential quadratic programming methods. UCSD Department of Mathematics, Technical report NA-10-03 (2010)Google Scholar
- 16.Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1(1), 81–106 (1986)Google Scholar
- 17.Rennie, J.D.: Regularized logistic regression is strictly convex. Technical report, MIT (2005)Google Scholar
- 20.Settles, B.: Active learning literature survey. Technical report, University of Wisconsin, Madison, vol. 52, no. 55–66, p. 11 (2010)Google Scholar