Skip to main content

Pontic Site Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Partial Extraction Therapy in Implant Dentistry

Abstract

Alveolar bone loss begins as soon as teeth are extracted. Root submergence technique (RST) and pontic shield (PS) embody the partial extraction therapy philosophy. The retention of a root or its part has benefited in the maintenance of hard and soft tissues. RST is a procedure wherein an entire root is left behind. The PS is a procedure wherein the shield is prepared similar to a socket shield, and only the buccal aspect of the root is left behind. RST was the first technique under the umbrella of PET. The current chapter discusses the indications, preparation aspects, complications, and management of these two concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32:212–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos KT. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23:313–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Araujo M, Sukekava F, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol. 2006;32:645–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, et al. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26:19–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Salama H, Salama MA, Garber D, Adar P. The inter-proximal height of bone: A guidepost to predictable aesthetic strategies and soft tissue contours in anterior tooth replacement. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998;10:1131–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salama M, Ishikawa T, Salama H, Funato A, Garber D. Advantages of the root sub-mergence technique for pontic site development in esthetic implant therapy. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27:521–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. Partial extraction therapies (PET) part 1: maintaining alveolar ridge contour at pontic and immediate implant sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016;36(5):681–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Howell F. Retention of alveolar bone by endodontic root treatment. Seminario Annual del Grupo de Estudios Dentales U.S.C de Mexico 23, May 1970

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malmgren B, Cvek M, Lundberg M, Frykholm A. Surgical treatment of ankylosed andinfrapositioned reimplanted incisors in adolescents. Scand J Dent Res. 1984;92:391–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Malmgren B, Malmgren O, Andreasen JO. Alveolar bone development after decoro-nation of ankylosed teeth. Endod Topics. 2006;14:35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Whitaker DD, Shankle RJ. A study of the histologic reaction of submerged root segments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974;37:919e35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levin MP, Getter L, Cutright DE, Bhaskar SN. Intentional submucosal submergence of nonvital roots. J Oral Surg. 1974;32(11):834–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guyer SE. Selectively retained vital roots for partial support of overdentures: A patient report. J Prosthet Dent. 1975;33:258–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Plata RL, Kelln EE, Linda L. Intentional retention of vital submerged roots in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976;42:100–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Neal R, Gound T, Levin MP, del Rio BCE. Submergence of roots for alveolar bone preservation. I. Endodontically treated roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978;45:803–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Welker WA, Jividen GJ, Kramer DC. Preventive prosthodontics--mucosal coverage of roots. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40:619–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Garver DG, Fenster RK. Vital root retention in humans: a final report. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:368–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Von Wowern N, Winther S. Submergence of roots for alveolar ridge preservation. A failure (4-year follow-up study). Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:247–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Garver DG, Muir TE. The retention of vital submucosal roots under immediate dentures: a surgical procedure. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Dec;50(6):753–6. PubMed PMID: 6581289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lambert PM, et al. Autogenous dermal graft coverage of submerged roots in the dog. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 42(9):595–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Harper KA. Submerging an endodontically treated root to preserve the alveolar ridge under a bridge—A case report. Dent Update. 2002;29:200–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wong KM, Chneh CM, Ang CW. Modified root submergence technique for multiple implant-supported maxillary anterior restorations in a patient with thin gingival biotype: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:349–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gongloff RK. Vital root retention. A 5-year experience. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg. 1986;15:33–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gluckman H, Salama M, Du Toit J. Partial extraction therapies (PET) part 2: procedures and technical aspects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017;37(3):377–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Glocker M, Attin T, Schmidlin P. Ridge preservation with modified “Socket- Shield” technique: methodological case series. Dent J. 2014;2:11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dohan DM, Choukroun J, Diss A, et al. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): a second-generation platelet concentrate. Part II : Plateletrelated biologic features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:E45–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Illustrations by: Udatta Kher*Case 5 Courtesy: Dr Ali Tunkiwala

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, T., Kulkarni, S., Kher, U. (2020). Pontic Site Management. In: Kher, U., Tunkiwala, A. (eds) Partial Extraction Therapy in Implant Dentistry . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33610-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33610-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33609-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33610-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics