Abstract
Undergraduate science laboratory courses are a powerful supplement to their corresponding lecture courses and can improve student learning. This is particularly true for introductory science courses. While the lectures provide students with a broad introduction to theory and history, the laboratory provides students with hands-on experience, opportunities to witness scientific principles firsthand, and, at its best, direct engagement with inquiry and the processes of science. Based on the science education literature, principles of backward design, and evidence-based practices, we have developed a project-based guided inquiry (PBGI) curriculum for students in the introductory chemistry laboratory. In the PBGI approach, students “solve a real-world problem over time through the systematic analysis of data and are given guiding questions to support the development of investigations to answer the problem” (Wheeler LB, Maeng JL, Chiu JL, Bell RL, J Res Sci Teach 54:463–492, 2017b). Essential to the PBGI curriculum are a team-based approach to engaging in inquiry and support mechanisms to ensure success of diverse students. Our research demonstrates the efficacy of the PBGI curriculum in improving students’ content knowledge, confidence, and skills. In this chapter, we describe our PBGI approach, detail the essential components of the PBGI curriculum, and describe research demonstrating the efficacy of our approach. We conclude with a section exploring different ways to modify the curriculum for different contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bell, R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005, October). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 30–33. https://doi.org/Article
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139.
Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Armstrong, N., & Hallar, B. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 16.
Brownell, S. E., Kloser, M. J., Fukami, T., & Shavelson, R. (2012). Undergraduate biology lab courses: Comparing the impact of traditionally based “cookbook” and authentic research-based courses on student lab experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 36–45.
Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 543. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p543.
Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco: Wiley.
Lord, T., & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. The American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342–346.
Matz, R. L., Rothman, E. D., Krajcik, J. S., & Banaszak Holl, M. M. (2012). Concurrent enrollment in lecture and laboratory enhances student performance and retention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21016.
National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9–34.
Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M. M., Gatlin, T. a., & Bhattacharyya, G. (2011). Students’ experience in a general chemistry cooperative problem based laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(4), 434. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90047a.
Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., & Whitworth, B. A. (2015). Teaching assistants’ perceptions of a training to support an inquiry-based general chemistry laboratory course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 824–842. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00104H.
Wheeler, L. B., Chiu, J. L., & Grisham, C. M. (2016). Computational methods in general chemistry: Perceptions of programming, prior experience, and student outcomes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(3), 83–91.
Wheeler, L. B., Clark, C. P., & Grisham, C. M. (2017a). Transforming a traditional laboratory to an inquiry-based course: Importance of training TAs when redesigning a curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(8). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00831.
Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., Chiu, J. L., & Bell, R. L. (2017b). Do teaching assistants matter? Investigating relationships between teaching assistants and student outcomes in undergraduate science laboratory classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 463–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21373.
Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., & Whitworth, B. A. (2017c). Characterizing teaching assistants’ knowledge and beliefs following professional development activities within an inquiry-based general chemistry context. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00373.
Wheeler, L. B., Chiu, J. L., Maeng, J. L., & Bell, R. L. (In preparation). Exploring research on student outcomes in inquiry-based undergraduate science laboratory instruction: A mixed methods synthetic review.
Wheeler, L., Sturtevant, H., & Mumba, F. (2019). An exploratory study of the impact of a Teaching Methods course for International Teaching Assistants in an inquiry-based general chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00239
Wolfram Research, Inc. (2018). Mathematica, Version 11.3, Champaign, IL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wheeler, L., Morkowchuk, L. (2020). Project-Based Guided Inquiry (PBGI) in Introductory Chemistry. In: Mintzes, J.J., Walter, E.M. (eds) Active Learning in College Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33599-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33600-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)