Skip to main content

Project-Based Guided Inquiry (PBGI) in Introductory Chemistry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Active Learning in College Science

Abstract

Undergraduate science laboratory courses are a powerful supplement to their corresponding lecture courses and can improve student learning. This is particularly true for introductory science courses. While the lectures provide students with a broad introduction to theory and history, the laboratory provides students with hands-on experience, opportunities to witness scientific principles firsthand, and, at its best, direct engagement with inquiry and the processes of science. Based on the science education literature, principles of backward design, and evidence-based practices, we have developed a project-based guided inquiry (PBGI) curriculum for students in the introductory chemistry laboratory. In the PBGI approach, students “solve a real-world problem over time through the systematic analysis of data and are given guiding questions to support the development of investigations to answer the problem” (Wheeler LB, Maeng JL, Chiu JL, Bell RL, J Res Sci Teach 54:463–492, 2017b). Essential to the PBGI curriculum are a team-based approach to engaging in inquiry and support mechanisms to ensure success of diverse students. Our research demonstrates the efficacy of the PBGI curriculum in improving students’ content knowledge, confidence, and skills. In this chapter, we describe our PBGI approach, detail the essential components of the PBGI curriculum, and describe research demonstrating the efficacy of our approach. We conclude with a section exploring different ways to modify the curriculum for different contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bell, R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005, October). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 30–33. https://doi.org/Article

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Armstrong, N., & Hallar, B. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, S. E., Kloser, M. J., Fukami, T., & Shavelson, R. (2012). Undergraduate biology lab courses: Comparing the impact of traditionally based “cookbook” and authentic research-based courses on student lab experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 543. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, T., & Orkwiszewski, T. (2006). Moving from didactic to inquiry-based instruction in a science laboratory. The American Biology Teacher, 68(6), 342–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matz, R. L., Rothman, E. D., Krajcik, J. S., & Banaszak Holl, M. M. (2012). Concurrent enrollment in lecture and laboratory enhances student performance and retention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2(1), 9–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M. M., Gatlin, T. a., & Bhattacharyya, G. (2011). Students’ experience in a general chemistry cooperative problem based laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(4), 434. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90047a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., & Whitworth, B. A. (2015). Teaching assistants’ perceptions of a training to support an inquiry-based general chemistry laboratory course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 824–842. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00104H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. B., Chiu, J. L., & Grisham, C. M. (2016). Computational methods in general chemistry: Perceptions of programming, prior experience, and student outcomes. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(3), 83–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. B., Clark, C. P., & Grisham, C. M. (2017a). Transforming a traditional laboratory to an inquiry-based course: Importance of training TAs when redesigning a curriculum. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(8). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., Chiu, J. L., & Bell, R. L. (2017b). Do teaching assistants matter? Investigating relationships between teaching assistants and student outcomes in undergraduate science laboratory classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 463–492. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. B., Maeng, J. L., & Whitworth, B. A. (2017c). Characterizing teaching assistants’ knowledge and beliefs following professional development activities within an inquiry-based general chemistry context. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L. B., Chiu, J. L., Maeng, J. L., & Bell, R. L. (In preparation). Exploring research on student outcomes in inquiry-based undergraduate science laboratory instruction: A mixed methods synthetic review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, L., Sturtevant, H., & Mumba, F. (2019). An exploratory study of the impact of a Teaching Methods course for International Teaching Assistants in an inquiry-based general chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00239 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram Research, Inc. (2018). Mathematica, Version 11.3, Champaign, IL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lindsay Wheeler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wheeler, L., Morkowchuk, L. (2020). Project-Based Guided Inquiry (PBGI) in Introductory Chemistry. In: Mintzes, J.J., Walter, E.M. (eds) Active Learning in College Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33600-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33599-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33600-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics