Well-Being and Its Conceptualization

  • Mariano RojasEmail author
Part of the Human Well-Being Research and Policy Making book series (HWBRPM)


It is in human condition to experience well-being; persons have many essential experiences of being well and are also able of making a well-being synthesis, usually in terms of being satisfied with their life. Human beings can also report their satisfaction in specific domains of life. The experience of being well is essential to human beings because it allows them to ponder vital decisions and to undertake particular actions. The best way of knowing these experiences of being well is by directly asking people.


Essential experiences of being well Evaluative well-being Affective well-being Sensory well-being Life satisfaction Domains-of-life satisfaction 


  1. Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well-being. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyle, M. (2002). The psychology of happiness. New York, NY, US: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of the psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, F. B., Chadwick, E. D., & Kluwe, K. (2011). Understanding the processes that regulate positive emotional experience: Unsolved problems and future directions for theory and research on savoring. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(1), 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, A. (1976). Subjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 31(2), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rodgers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  9. Cialdini, R. B. (2006). Influence: The psychology of persuasion (Rev. ed.). Harper Business.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, A., Kamesaka, A., & Tamura, T. (2015). Rising aspirations dampen satisfaction. Education Economics, 23(5), 515–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Sanfey, P. (2012). Job satisfaction, wage change and quits: Evidence from Germany. Research in Labor Economics, 35, 499–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crooker, K., & Near, J. (1998). Happiness and satisfaction: Measures of affect and cognition? Social Indicators Research, 44, 195–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  14. Cummins, R. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38, 303–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummins, R., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian unity wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Day, R. L. (1987). Relationships between life satisfaction and consumer satisfaction. In A. Coskun Samli (Ed.), Marketing and the quality of life interface. New York: Quorum Books.Google Scholar
  17. Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, A., & Griffin, R. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assesment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life-satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112, 497–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., Napa-Scollon, C. K., Oishi, S., Dzokoto, V., & Eunkook, M. S. (2000). Positivity and the construction of life satisfaction judgments: Global happiness is not the sum of its parts. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2015). National accounts of subjective well-being. American Psychologists, 70(3), 234–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (Eds.). (2000). Culture and subjective well-being. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Press.Google Scholar
  22. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diener, E., & Tov, W. (2012). National accounts of well-being. In K. C. Land, A. C. Michalos, & M. J. Sirgy (Eds.), Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research (pp. 137–156). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Domínguez, B., Montero, G., & López, M. (2016). Pain, emotions, and social-well-being in Mexico: Challenges and future trending. In: M. Rojas (Ed.), Handbook of happiness research in Latin America (pp. 489–514). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Eich, E., Kihlstrom, J., Bower, G., Forgas, J., & Niedenthal, P. (2000). Cognition and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65, 245–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elliott, T., Renier, C., & Palcher, J. (2003). Chronic pain, depression, and quality of life: Correlations and predictive value of the SF-36. Pain Medicine, 4(4), 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2002). Subjective questions to measure welfare and well-being. Discussion paper TI 2002-020/3, Tinbergen Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 230–243.Google Scholar
  31. Fiedler, K., & Forgas, J. (1988). Affect, cognition and social behavior. Toronto, Canada: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  32. Flanagan, J. (1978). A research approach to improving our quality of life. American Psychologist, 33, 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Forgas, J. (1991). Emotion and social judgment. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Forgas, J. (2000). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Frijda, N., Manstead, A., & Bem, S. (2000). Emotions and believes: How feelings influence thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gatchel, R., Peng, Y., Peters, M., Fuchs, P., & Turk, D. (2007). The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: Scientific advances and future directions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 581–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (2001). A cognitive model of individual well-being. Social Choice and Welfare, 18, 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Headey, B., Holmström, E., & Wearing, A. (1984). The impact of life events and changes in domain satisfactions on well-being. Social Indicators Research, 15, 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Headey, B., & Wearing, A. (1992). Understanding happiness: A theory of subjective well-being. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  40. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (2018). World happiness report 2018. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.Google Scholar
  41. Jones, T., Rapport, L., Hanks, R., Lichtenberg, P., & Telmet, K. (2003). Cognitive and psychosocial predictors of subjective well-being in urban older adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lame, I., Peters, M., Vlaeyen, J., Kleef, K., & Patijn, J. (2005). Quality of life in chronic pain is more associated with beliefs about pain, than with pain intensity. European Journal of Pain, 9(1), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larsen, R., & Fredrickson, B. (1999). Measurement issues in emotion research. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 40–59). Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  45. Liberini, F., Oswald, A. J., Proto, E., & Redoano, M. (2017a). Was Brexit caused by the unhappy and the old? Discussion paper No. 11059, IZA Institute of Labor Economics.Google Scholar
  46. Liberini, F., Redoano, M., & Proto, E. (2017b). Happy voters. Journal of Public Economics, 146, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in economic theory and economic behavior. American Economic Review, 90, 426–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46, 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Martínez, J., & Castillo, H. (2016). “Like the zompopito”: Social relationships in happiness among rural and indigenous women in Nicaragua. In M. Rojas (Ed.), Handbook of happiness research in Latin America (pp. 113–127). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Martínez Bravo, I. (2016). The usefulness of subjective wellbeing to predict electoral results in Latin America. In M. Rojas (Ed.), Handbook of happiness research in Latin America (pp. 613–632). New York, NY: Springer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McBride, M. (2010). Money, happiness and aspirations: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 74, 262–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McClendon, M., & O’Brien, D. (1988). Question order effects on the determinants of subjective well-being. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 52(3), 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Michalos, A. C. (1985). Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT). Social Indicators Research, 16, 347–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Murphy, F., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Lawrence, A. (2003). Functional neuroanatomy of emotions: A meta-analysis, cognitive. Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(3), 207–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihályi, M. (2001). Flow theory and research. In C. Snyder, E. Wright, & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195–206). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., & Colcombe, S. (2003). The contextual and systematic nature of life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Packard, V. (1957). The hidden persuaders. Longmans: Green and Co.Google Scholar
  60. Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  61. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 28, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pfister, H., & Böhm, G. (2008). The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  63. Rojas, M. (2006). Life satisfaction and satisfaction in domains of life: Is it a simple relationship? Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(4), 467–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rojas, M. (2007). The complexity of well-being: A life-satisfaction conception and a domains-of-life approach. In I. Gough & J. A. McGregor (Eds.), Researching well-being in developing countries: From theory to research (pp. 259–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Rojas, M. (2017). The subjective object of well-being studies. In G. Brule & F. Maggino (Eds.), Metrics of subjective well-being: Limits and improvements (pp. 43–62). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. Rojas, M., & Elizondo, M. (2012). Satisfacción de Vida en Costa Rica: Un Enfoque de Dominios de Vida. Latin American Research Review, 47(1), 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rojas, M., & Guardiola, J. (2017). Hunger and the experience of being well: Absolute and relative concerns. World Development, 96, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rojas, M., & Martínez, I. (2012). Measurement, research and inclusion in public policy of subjective wellbeing: Latin America. México, D.F.: Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico.Google Scholar
  69. Rojas, M., & Veenhoven, R. (2013). Contentment and affect in the estimation of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 415–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1991). Evaluating one’s life: A judgment model of subjective well-being. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 27–47). Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  71. Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1999). Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 61–84). Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  72. Steffel, M., & Oppenheimer, D. (2009). Happy by what standard? The role of interpersonal and intrapersonal comparisons in ratings of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 92, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stutzer, A. (2004). The role of income aspirations in individual happiness. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54, 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stutzer, A., & Lalive, R. (2004). The role of social work norms in job searching and subjective well-being. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(4), 696–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Suls, J., & Wheeler, L. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  76. van Praag, B., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. van Praag, B. M. S., & Ferrer-I-Carbonell, A. (2004). Happiness quantified: A satisfaction calculus approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  79. Veenhoven, R. (1987). Cultural bias in ratings of perceived life quality. Social Indicators Research, 18, 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicators Research, 37, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Warburton, D., & Sherwood, N. (Eds.). (1996). Pleasure and quality of life. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. Ward, G. (2019). Happiness and voting behavior. World happiness report 2019. Sustainable Development Network.Google Scholar
  83. Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Williams, A., Davies, H., & Chadury, Y. (2000). Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meaning. Pain, 85, 457–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilson, D., Williams, M., & Butler, D. (2009). Language and the pain experience. Physiotherapy Research International, 14(1), 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zapf, W., & Glatzer, W. (1987). German social report: Living conditions and subjective well-being, (1978–1984). Social Indicators Research, 19, 1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (UNIR)LogroñoSpain
  2. 2.Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla (UPAEP)PueblaMexico

Personalised recommendations