Abstract
The concept of participation has become a new paradigm for considering the relationship of individuals to the media. The audiences, which were previously viewed as being on the receiving end of messages, are now considered to be at the center of a participatory situation. The aim of this book is to contribute to a theoretical assessment of these issues, based on empirical case studies and on construction of a public, the participation of audiences in the media system and the types of experience individuals have. There have been numerous scientific publications on issues of audience participation and media in recent years. However, there is still not enough scientific dialogue between French-speaking and English-speaking researchers with regard to these internationally relevant issues. This volume aims to outline a distinctly French approach to current debate in audience research, which can be characterized by three aspects in particular: its appraisal of real-world practices, a focus on the collective product of audience participation and a criticism of ordinary participation in the media.
Translation: Ian Margo, Teri Jones-Villeneuve & Céline Ségur
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In particular, this resulted in an interdisciplinary project called Publictionnaire, an online “Encyclopaedic and critical dictionary of audiences” (access: http://publictionnaire.huma-num.fr). To date, it has more than 250 entries written by more than 150 contributors; additional terms will be added following current and future research.
- 2.
Translation by the authors (as for all French quotes in the book).
- 3.
In France, “the term ‘social TV’ is used to describe technologies that enhance content and interaction between viewers and the content they are watching or want to watch and between viewers themselves regarding this content” (CSA , 2013, Première approche de la télévision sociale [First approach to social television]. Access: http://www.csa.fr/Etudes-et-publications/Les-etudes-thematiques-et-les-etudes-d-impact/Les-etudes-du-CSA/Premiere-approche-de-la-television-sociale. Accessed 27 April 2018). It mainly applies to technologies that allow viewers to react to a television program (before, during and/or after broadcast) using digital means: Twitter feed, contests and so on. The aim is to enhance the television viewer’s experience.
- 4.
France’s second and third television channels were created in 1964 and 1971, respectively.
- 5.
Audience measurement as those common today (in particular with the use of audimeters) are conducted in France since the 1980s. Before that, surveys about viewing practices and satisfaction were held by the Service de relation avec les téléspectateurs, then the Centre d’étude de l’opinion.
- 6.
At times, the authors had to update certain elements of their work due to political and/or media changes with regard to the analyzed situations. Most often, a productive dialogue ensued between the translators and the authors, which helped refine their stances. We would like to thank all those who contributed to this project.
- 7.
Dakhlia J., dir. 2015, À la recherche des publics populaires (1). Faire peuple, Nancy, Éditions universitaires de Lorraine, série « Actes », 26, 250 p.; Dakhlia J., Le Nozach D., Ségur C., dirs, 2016, À la recherche des publics populaires (2). Être peuple, Nancy, Éditions universitaires de Lorraine, série « Actes », 33, 218 p.; Ballarini L., Ségur C., 2018, Devenir public. Modalités et enjeux, Éd. Mare & Martin, collection « MediaCritic », 191 p.; Journal Études de communication, livraison 47 published in 2016, Université Lille 3.
Bibliography
Ballarini, L., & Ségur, C. (Eds.). (2018). Devenir public. Modalités et enjeux. Paris: Éd. Mare & Martin.
Bourdon, J. (2011). Du service public à la télé-réalité. Une histoire culturelle des télévisions européennes. Bry-sur-Marne: Ina Éditions.
Butsch, R., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.). (2014). Meanings of Audiences: Comparative Discourses. Abingdon: Routledge.
Carpentier, N. (2016). Différencier accès, interaction et participation. In P. Morelli, N. Pignard-Cheynel, & D. Baltazart (Eds.), Publics et TIC. Confrontations conceptuelles et recherches empiriques (pp. 45–69). Nancy: PUN-Éditions universitaires de Lorraine.
Carpentier, N. (2019, September 12–13). Participation as Ethical: An Argument for the Relevance of Participation Beyond the Bad/Dark Participation Concept. International Symposium La participation dans un monde de communication (LASCO–PreCOM), Bruxelles.
Cefaï, D., & Pasquier, D. (Eds.). (2003). Les sens du public. Publics politiques, publics médiatiques. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Châteauvert, J., & Delavaud, G. (Eds.). (2016). D’un écran à l’autre, les mutations du spectateur. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dahlgren, P. (2012). Web et participation politique: quelles promesses et quels pièges? (Translated from English by J.-F. Nominé & R. Dickinson). Questions de communication, 21, 13–24.
Dakhlia, J., Le Nozach, D., & Ségur, C. (Eds.). (2016). À la recherche des publics populaires (2). Être peuple. Nancy: Éditions universitaires de Lorraine.
Dayan, D. (2005). Mothers, Midwives and Abortionists: Genealogy, Obstetrics, Audiences & Public. In S. Livingstone (Ed.), Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere (pp. 43–76). Bristol: Intellect.
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
Elias, N. (1991). La société des individus. Paris: Fayard.
Flichy, P. (2008, January 14). Internet, un outil de la démocratie? La vie des idées. Retrieved February 7, 2019, from https://laviedesidees.fr/Internet-un-outil-de-la-democratie.html.
Gimello-Mesplomb, F., & Vilatte, J.-C. (Eds.). (2015). Les recherches sur les publics en sciences de l’information et de la communication. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.1466.
Goulet, V. (2004). Le médiateur de la rédaction de France 2. L’institutionnalisation d’un public idéal. Questions de communication, 5, 281–299.
Habermas, J. (1962 [1993]). L’Espace public. Archéologie de la publicité comme dimension constitutive de la société bourgeoise (Translated from German by M. B. de Launay). Paris: Payot.
Hodkinson, P. (2017). Media, Culture and Society. London: Sage Publications.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: When Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
Jost, F. (1999). Introduction à l’analyse de la television. Paris: Éd. Ellipses.
Jost, Fr. (Ed.) (2014). La télévision et après: vers le transmédia. Télévision, 5.
Kredens, E., & Rio, F. (Eds.). (2015). Pratiques télévisuelles à l’ère du numérique. Études de communication, 44, 9–130.
Leveneur, L. (2006). Du télé-viseur au téléspectateur. Quand la télévision joue avec ceux qui la regardent. Questions de communication, 10, 333–348.
Livingstone, S. (Ed.). (2005). Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere. Bristol: Intellect.
Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (1994). Talk on television, audience participation and public debate. Londres: Routledge.
Maigret, É. (2013). Penser la convergence et le transmédia: avec et au-delà de Jenkins. In H. Jenkins (Ed.), La culture de la convergence. Des médias au transmédia (pp. 5–19). Paris: A. Colin/Ina.
Méadel, C. (2010). Quantifier le public. Histoire des mesures d’audience de la radio et de la television. Paris: Éd. Economica.
Mehl, D. (1996). La télévision de l’intimité. Paris: Éd. Le Seuil.
Nadaud-Albertini, N. (2013). 12 ans de téléréalité… au delà des critiques morales. Bry-sur-Marne: Ina Éditions.
Nightingale, V. (Ed.). (2011). The Handbook of Media Audiences. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Olivesi, A., & Hubé, N. (Eds.). (2016). Des ‘vraies gens’ aux ‘followers’. Médias numériques et parole politique. Politiques de communication, 6, 5–134.
Pasquier, D. (1999). La culture des sentiments. L’expérience télévisuelle des adolescents. Paris: Éd. de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Pereny, É., & Amato, É. A. (2011). Audiovisuel interactif. Communications, 88, 29–36.
Perry, S. (2008). Participatory Democracy in French Television Debates: The 2007 French Presidential Election in Context. Web Journal of French Media Studies, 7. Retrieved from http://wjfms.ncl.ac.uk/frframes.htm.
Poels, G. (2015). Les Trente Glorieuses du téléspectateur. Une histoire de la réception télévisuelle des années 1950 aux années 1980. Paris: Ina éditions.
Rouzé, V. (2017). Participatif. Publictionnaire. Dictionnaire encyclopédique et critique des publics. Online from 23 November. Retrieved February 28, 2019, from http://publictionnaire.huma-num.fr/notice/participatif.
Ruddock, A. (2015). Understanding Audiences. London: Sage Publications.
Segré, G. (2017). Fan. Publictionnaire. Dictionnaire encyclopédique et critique des publics. Online from 4 April. Retrieved February 7, 2019, from http://publictionnaire.huma-num.fr/notice/fan.
Ségur, C. (2010). Les recherches sur les téléspectateurs. Trajectoire(s) académique(s). Paris: Hermès Lavoisier.
Ségur, C. (2015). L’étude des publics de télévision en SIC. Quelle évolution conceptuelle? Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.1470.
Ségur, C. (2019). Le grand public de la télévision et Jean-Christophe Averty: un rendez-vous manqué? In S. Pierre (Ed.), Jean-Christophe Averty: penser la television au XXe siècle (pp. 113–136). Paris: Éd. L’Harmattan.
Soulez, G., & Kitsopanidou, K. (Eds.) (2015). Le levain des médias: forme, format, média. MEI. Médiation et information, 39.
Tarde, G. (1901 [1989]). L’opinion et la foule. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Thornborrow, J. (2015). The Discourse of Public Participation Media. From Talk Show to Twitter. Andover: Routledge.
Turner, G. (2010). Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn. London: Sage Publications.
Turner, G., & Tay, J. (Eds.). (2009). Television Studies after TV: Understanding Television in the Post-Broadcast Era. London: Routledge.
Zask, J. (2011). Participer. Essai sur les formes démocratiques de la participation. Paris: Le Bord de l’eau.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ségur, C. (2020). French Perspectives on Media, Participation and Audiences: Introduction. In: Ségur, C. (eds) French Perspectives on Media, Participation and Audiences. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33346-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33346-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33345-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33346-1
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)