Skip to main content

French Perspectives on Media, Participation and Audiences: Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover French Perspectives on Media, Participation and Audiences

Abstract

The concept of participation has become a new paradigm for considering the relationship of individuals to the media. The audiences, which were previously viewed as being on the receiving end of messages, are now considered to be at the center of a participatory situation. The aim of this book is to contribute to a theoretical assessment of these issues, based on empirical case studies and on construction of a public, the participation of audiences in the media system and the types of experience individuals have. There have been numerous scientific publications on issues of audience participation and media in recent years. However, there is still not enough scientific dialogue between French-speaking and English-speaking researchers with regard to these internationally relevant issues. This volume aims to outline a distinctly French approach to current debate in audience research, which can be characterized by three aspects in particular: its appraisal of real-world practices, a focus on the collective product of audience participation and a criticism of ordinary participation in the media.

Translation: Ian Margo, Teri Jones-Villeneuve & Céline Ségur

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In particular, this resulted in an interdisciplinary project called Publictionnaire, an online “Encyclopaedic and critical dictionary of audiences” (access: http://publictionnaire.huma-num.fr). To date, it has more than 250 entries written by more than 150 contributors; additional terms will be added following current and future research.

  2. 2.

    Translation by the authors (as for all French quotes in the book).

  3. 3.

    In France, “the term ‘social TV’ is used to describe technologies that enhance content and interaction between viewers and the content they are watching or want to watch and between viewers themselves regarding this content” (CSA , 2013, Première approche de la télévision sociale [First approach to social television]. Access: http://www.csa.fr/Etudes-et-publications/Les-etudes-thematiques-et-les-etudes-d-impact/Les-etudes-du-CSA/Premiere-approche-de-la-television-sociale. Accessed 27 April 2018). It mainly applies to technologies that allow viewers to react to a television program (before, during and/or after broadcast) using digital means: Twitter feed, contests and so on. The aim is to enhance the television viewer’s experience.

  4. 4.

    France’s second and third television channels were created in 1964 and 1971, respectively.

  5. 5.

    Audience measurement as those common today (in particular with the use of audimeters) are conducted in France since the 1980s. Before that, surveys about viewing practices and satisfaction were held by the Service de relation avec les téléspectateurs, then the Centre d’étude de l’opinion.

  6. 6.

    At times, the authors had to update certain elements of their work due to political and/or media changes with regard to the analyzed situations. Most often, a productive dialogue ensued between the translators and the authors, which helped refine their stances. We would like to thank all those who contributed to this project.

  7. 7.

    Dakhlia J., dir. 2015, À la recherche des publics populaires (1). Faire peuple, Nancy, Éditions universitaires de Lorraine, série « Actes », 26, 250 p.; Dakhlia J., Le Nozach D., Ségur C., dirs, 2016, À la recherche des publics populaires (2). Être peuple, Nancy, Éditions universitaires de Lorraine, série « Actes », 33, 218 p.; Ballarini L., Ségur C., 2018, Devenir public. Modalités et enjeux, Éd. Mare & Martin, collection « MediaCritic », 191 p.; Journal Études de communication, livraison 47 published in 2016, Université Lille 3.

Bibliography

  • Ballarini, L., & Ségur, C. (Eds.). (2018). Devenir public. Modalités et enjeux. Paris: Éd. Mare & Martin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdon, J. (2011). Du service public à la télé-réalité. Une histoire culturelle des télévisions européennes. Bry-sur-Marne: Ina Éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butsch, R., & Livingstone, S. (Eds.). (2014). Meanings of Audiences: Comparative Discourses. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, N. (2016). Différencier accès, interaction et participation. In P. Morelli, N. Pignard-Cheynel, & D. Baltazart (Eds.), Publics et TIC. Confrontations conceptuelles et recherches empiriques (pp. 45–69). Nancy: PUN-Éditions universitaires de Lorraine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier, N. (2019, September 12–13). Participation as Ethical: An Argument for the Relevance of Participation Beyond the Bad/Dark Participation Concept. International Symposium La participation dans un monde de communication (LASCO–PreCOM), Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cefaï, D., & Pasquier, D. (Eds.). (2003). Les sens du public. Publics politiques, publics médiatiques. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Châteauvert, J., & Delavaud, G. (Eds.). (2016). D’un écran à l’autre, les mutations du spectateur. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P. (2012). Web et participation politique: quelles promesses et quels pièges? (Translated from English by J.-F. Nominé & R. Dickinson). Questions de communication, 21, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakhlia, J., Le Nozach, D., & Ségur, C. (Eds.). (2016). À la recherche des publics populaires (2). Être peuple. Nancy: Éditions universitaires de Lorraine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayan, D. (2005). Mothers, Midwives and Abortionists: Genealogy, Obstetrics, Audiences & Public. In S. Livingstone (Ed.), Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere (pp. 43–76). Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1991). La société des individus. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flichy, P. (2008, January 14). Internet, un outil de la démocratie? La vie des idées. Retrieved February 7, 2019, from https://laviedesidees.fr/Internet-un-outil-de-la-democratie.html.

  • Gimello-Mesplomb, F., & Vilatte, J.-C. (Eds.). (2015). Les recherches sur les publics en sciences de l’information et de la communication. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.1466.

  • Goulet, V. (2004). Le médiateur de la rédaction de France 2. L’institutionnalisation d’un public idéal. Questions de communication, 5, 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1962 [1993]). L’Espace public. Archéologie de la publicité comme dimension constitutive de la société bourgeoise (Translated from German by M. B. de Launay). Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, P. (2017). Media, Culture and Society. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: When Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, F. (1999). Introduction à l’analyse de la television. Paris: Éd. Ellipses.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, Fr. (Ed.) (2014). La télévision et après: vers le transmédia. Télévision, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kredens, E., & Rio, F. (Eds.). (2015). Pratiques télévisuelles à l’ère du numérique. Études de communication, 44, 9–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leveneur, L. (2006). Du télé-viseur au téléspectateur. Quand la télévision joue avec ceux qui la regardent. Questions de communication, 10, 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (Ed.). (2005). Audiences and Publics: When Cultural Engagement Matters for the Public Sphere. Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (1994). Talk on television, audience participation and public debate. Londres: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maigret, É. (2013). Penser la convergence et le transmédia: avec et au-delà de Jenkins. In H. Jenkins (Ed.), La culture de la convergence. Des médias au transmédia (pp. 5–19). Paris: A. Colin/Ina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Méadel, C. (2010). Quantifier le public. Histoire des mesures d’audience de la radio et de la television. Paris: Éd. Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehl, D. (1996). La télévision de l’intimité. Paris: Éd. Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadaud-Albertini, N. (2013). 12 ans de téléréalité… au delà des critiques morales. Bry-sur-Marne: Ina Éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, V. (Ed.). (2011). The Handbook of Media Audiences. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivesi, A., & Hubé, N. (Eds.). (2016). Des ‘vraies gens’ aux ‘followers’. Médias numériques et parole politique. Politiques de communication, 6, 5–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquier, D. (1999). La culture des sentiments. L’expérience télévisuelle des adolescents. Paris: Éd. de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pereny, É., & Amato, É. A. (2011). Audiovisuel interactif. Communications, 88, 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, S. (2008). Participatory Democracy in French Television Debates: The 2007 French Presidential Election in Context. Web Journal of French Media Studies, 7. Retrieved from http://wjfms.ncl.ac.uk/frframes.htm.

  • Poels, G. (2015). Les Trente Glorieuses du téléspectateur. Une histoire de la réception télévisuelle des années 1950 aux années 1980. Paris: Ina éditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouzé, V. (2017). Participatif. Publictionnaire. Dictionnaire encyclopédique et critique des publics. Online from 23 November. Retrieved February 28, 2019, from http://publictionnaire.huma-num.fr/notice/participatif.

  • Ruddock, A. (2015). Understanding Audiences. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segré, G. (2017). Fan. Publictionnaire. Dictionnaire encyclopédique et critique des publics. Online from 4 April. Retrieved February 7, 2019, from http://publictionnaire.huma-num.fr/notice/fan.

  • Ségur, C. (2010). Les recherches sur les téléspectateurs. Trajectoire(s) académique(s). Paris: Hermès Lavoisier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ségur, C. (2015). L’étude des publics de télévision en SIC. Quelle évolution conceptuelle? Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, 7. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.1470.

  • Ségur, C. (2019). Le grand public de la télévision et Jean-Christophe Averty: un rendez-vous manqué? In S. Pierre (Ed.), Jean-Christophe Averty: penser la television au XXe siècle (pp. 113–136). Paris: Éd. L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulez, G., & Kitsopanidou, K. (Eds.) (2015). Le levain des médias: forme, format, média. MEI. Médiation et information, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarde, G. (1901 [1989]). L’opinion et la foule. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornborrow, J. (2015). The Discourse of Public Participation Media. From Talk Show to Twitter. Andover: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G. (2010). Ordinary People and the Media: The Demotic Turn. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G., & Tay, J. (Eds.). (2009). Television Studies after TV: Understanding Television in the Post-Broadcast Era. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zask, J. (2011). Participer. Essai sur les formes démocratiques de la participation. Paris: Le Bord de l’eau.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Céline Ségur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ségur, C. (2020). French Perspectives on Media, Participation and Audiences: Introduction. In: Ségur, C. (eds) French Perspectives on Media, Participation and Audiences. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33346-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics