Abstract
In Parts I–V of this book are 15 chapters discussing the various levels of the social-ecological model as they related to diabetes management in pediatric populations. One recurring theme that appears in many of the chapters is the fact that the majority of youth with diabetes do not meet goals for optimal glycemic control, in spite of therapeutic and technological advances in treatment in recent years. Moreover, this disparity illuminates the limitations of relying on sophisticated technology alone to optimize diabetes clinical outcomes. When we consider the complexity of diabetes treatment and embrace the social-ecological nature of a lifestyle disease, it is not truly a surprise that advances such as newer insulin analogues, continuous glucose monitors, and insulin pumps have not resulted in optimal glycemic control.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
American Diabetes Association. (2017). Children and adolescents. Diabetes Care, 40(Supplement 1), S105–S113.
Charalampopoulos, D., Hermann JM Svensson, J., et al. (2018). Exploring variation in glycemic control across and within eight high-income countries: A cross-sectional analysis of 64,666 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 41(6), 1180–1187.
de Wit, M., Pulgarón, E., Patiño-Fernandez, A. M., & Delamater, A. (2014). Psychological support for children with diabetes: Are the guidelines being met? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 21(2), 190–199.
Delamater, A. M. (2012). Successful team management of type 1 diabetes in children and young people: Key psychosocial issues. Diabetes Care in Children & Young People, 1, 10–16.
Delamater, A. M., de Wit, M., McDarby, V., Malik, J., Hilliard, M. E., Northam, E., & Acerini, C. L. (2018). ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines: Psychological care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatric Diabetes, 19(Supplement 27), 237–249.
DeSalvo, D. J., Miller, K. M., Hermann, J. M., Maahs, D. M., et al. (2018). Continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes: International comparison from the T1D exchange and DPV initiative. Pediatric Diabetes, 19, 1271–1275.
Ellis, D., Naar-King, S., Templin, T., Frey, M., Cunningham, P., Sheidow, A., . . . Idalski, A. (2008). Multisystemic therapy for adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: Reduced diabetic ketoacidosis admissions and related costs over 24 months. Diabetes Care, 31(9), 1746–1747.
Fisher, L., Gonzalez, J. S., & Polonsky, W. H. (2014). The confusing tale of depression and distress in patients with diabetes: A call for greater clarity and precision. Diabetic Medicine, 31(7), 764–772.
Foster, N. C., Beck, W., Miller, K. M., Clements, M. A., Rickles, M. R., DiMeglio, L. A., … for the T1D Exchange Clinical Network. (2019). State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 21(2), 66–72.
Hood, K. K., Iturralde, E., Rausch, J., & Weissberg-Benchell, J. (2018). Preventing diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Results one year after participation in the STePS program. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2556
Hood, K. K., Rohan, J. M., Peterson, C. M., & Drotar, D. (2010). Interventions with adherence-promoting components in pediatric type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 33, 1658–1664.
Marrero, D. G., Ard, J., Delamater, A. M., Peragallo-Ditko, V., Mayer-Davis, E. J., Nwankwo, R., & Fisher, E. B. (2013). 21st century behavioral medicine: A context for empowering clinicians and patients with diabetes—A consensus report. Diabetes Care, 36, 463–470.
Naranjo, D., Schwartz, D. D., & Delamater, A. M. (2015). Diabetes in ethnically diverse youth: Disparate burden and intervention approaches. Current Diabetes Reviews, 11, 251–260.
Skinner, T. C., Lange, K. S., Hoey, H., et al. (2018). The Hvidoere study group targets and teamwork: Understanding differences in paediatric diabetes centers treatment outcomes. Pediatric Diabetes, 19(3), 559–565.
Swift, P. G., Skinner, T. C., De Beaufort, C. E., et al. (2010). Target setting in intensive insulin management is associated with metabolic control: The Hvidoere childhood diabetes study group Centre differences study 2005. Pediatric Diabetes, 11, 271–278.
Wood, J. R., Miller, K. M., Maahs, D. M., et al. (2013). Most youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D exchange clinic registry do not meet American Diabetes Association or International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes clinical guidelines. Diabetes Care, 36, 2035–2037.
Young-Hyman, D., de Groot, M., Hill-Briggs, F., Gonzalez, J. S., Hood, K., & Peyrot, M. (2016). Psychosocial care for people with diabetes: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care, 39(12), 2126–2140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Delamater, A.M., Marrero, D.G. (2020). Summary and Implications for Clinical Practice and Research in Pediatric Populations. In: Delamater, A., Marrero, D. (eds) Behavioral Diabetes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33286-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33286-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33284-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33286-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)