Good Natural Resource Governance: How Does the EU Deal with the Contestation of Transparency Standards?

Part of the Norm Research in International Relations book series (NOREINRE)


Transparency is an organizing principle of the norm of good governance. The EU has adopted a number of policies to promote this norm as a way to address corruption and cronyism in the natural resource sector of many countries. On the global scale, the EU supports the standards of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative. At home, the EU Accounting and Transparency Directives make it for EU companies mandatory to report payments to domestic and foreign authorities for oil, gas and timber extraction rights. This norm has been contested from different sides. China argues that economic development precedes good governance, instead of the other way around. Natural resource-rich countries see global standards as an intrusion of their sovereignty. The extractive industry in Western countries claims that national policies could disadvantage them by creating an uneven playing field. The chapter argues that these contestations remained predominantly soft and did not affect the legitimacy of the organizing principle too much. None of the contesters openly challenged the principle of transparency, but they rather tried to reduce its importance or to change the standardized procedures that came from it. As the EU did not waiver, these efforts have so far not been very successfully.



Martijn C. Vlaskamp thanks the Beatriu de Pinós postdoctoral program of the Government of Catalonia’s Secretariat for Universities and Research (Ministry of Economy and Knowledge) for funding (Grant number: 2017-BP-152). Research was also supported by the EU’s Horizon 2020 Research & Innovation program (grant number 660245). Martijn thanks Carla Perucca for valuable research assistance and Alanna Irving for proofreading this text. The usual attribution of possible faults applies.


  1. Aaronson, S. A. (2011). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EIT). Public Administration and Development, 31(1), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. African Union Commission, & European Commission. (2008, October 8). Joint statement of the African Union Commission (AUC) and the European Commission (EC) On the implementation of the Africa-EU Energy Partnership. Retrieved March 14, 2013, from Africa-EU Energy Partnership website:
  3. Benschop, D. (2013, February 18). Opinie artikel in het FD… Graag eerlijk zijn over transparantie. Het Financieele Dagblad. Retrieved from
  4. Carroll, C. (2012, October 10). API files court challenge against costly, anti-competitive SEC rule. Retrieved March 17, 2013, from American Petroleum Institute website:
  5. Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2002). On the incidence of Civil War in Africa. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(1), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corrigan, C. C. (2014). Breaking the resource curse: Transparency in the natural resource sector and the extractive industries transparency initiative. Resources Policy, 40, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cust, J. (2018). The role of governance and international norms in managing natural resources. In Tony Addison & Alan Roe (Eds.), Extractive industries: The management of resources as a driver of sustainable development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. EITI. (2016). EITI brief: Chinese companies reporting in EITI implementing countries. Retrieved from
  9. EITI. (2019). EITi supporting countries contribution 2017. Retrieved from
  10. European Commission. (2012, December 21). Parliamentary questions about the transparency of the extractive industry. Retrieved from
  11. European Commission. (2013). New disclosure requirements for the extractive industry and loggers of primary forests in the Accounting (and Transparency) Directives (Country by Country Reporting)—frequently asked questions. Retrieved from
  12. European Commission. (2018a). Review of country-by-country reporting requirements for extractive and logging industries. Retrieved from
  13. European Commission. (2018b, May 31). DG FISMA meetings and lobby meetings on public country-by-country reporting. Retrieved from
  14. European Parliament. (2011). European Parliament resolution of 13 September 2011 on an effective raw materials strategy for Europe. Retrieved from
  15. European Union. (2013a). Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC Text with EEA relevance. Retrieved from
  16. European Union. (2013b). Directive 2013/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market. Retrieved from
  17. Extractive Industry Representatives, & Civil Society Representatives. (2019, June 11). Joint letter by industry and civil society. Retrieved from….pdf.
  18. Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. G20. (2009). G20 leaders statement: The Pittsburgh summit. Retrieved from
  20. Government of Equatorial Guinea. (2018). Letter of intent, memorandum of economic and financial policies, and technical memorandum of understanding. Retrieved from
  21. Haufler, V. (2010). Disclosure as governance: The extractive industries transparency initiative and resource management in the developing world. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Human Rights Watch. (2018). Equatorial Guinea: Prominent activist severely beaten. Retrieved May 11, 2019, from
  23. International Association of Oil and Gas Producers. (2018). Q&A/ briefing: Legislation on extractive industry payments to governments. Retrieved from
  24. International Monetary Fund. (2010). Angola—fifth review under the stand-by arrangement, request for waiver of applicability of performance criteria, and request for modification of performance. Retrieved from International Monetary Fund website:
  25. Kamp, H. G. J. (2013, February 8). Kamerbrief uitzonderingsclausule rapportage betalingen aan regeringen. Retrieved from
  26. Lujala, P. (2018). An analysis of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative implementation process. World Development, 107, 358–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lujala, P., Rustad, S. A., & Le Billon, P. (2017). Has the EITI been successful? Reviewing evaluations of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (No. 5). Retrieved from Chr. Michelsen Institute website:
  28. Matthews, C. M. (2012, August 22). SEC Narrowly Approves Reporting Rules on Resource Extraction, Conflict Minerals. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from
  29. Moran, T. H. (2013). Reform EITI to require compliant countries to publish disaggregated company-by-company revenue payments. Retrieved from
  30. Mouan, L. C. (2010). Exploring the potential benefits of Asian participation in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative: The case of China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Natural Resource Governance Institute. (2017). 2017 resource governance index. Retrieved from
  32. Natural Resource Governance Institute. (2019). Natural resource governance glossary. Retrieved May 10, 2019, from
  33. Obama, B. (2011, September 20). Opening remarks by President Obama on open government partnership. Retrieved March 7, 2013, from Website of the White House website:
  34. Oussov, A. (2016, July 1). “Does Russia need EITI?”, an article for the “Neft Rossii” magazine (issue 7–8, July–August 2016). Retrieved May 8, 2019, from KPMG website:
  35. Partzsch, L., & Vlaskamp, M. C. (2016). Mandatory due diligence for ‘conflict minerals’ and illegally logged timber: Emergence and cascade of a new norm on foreign accountability. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(4), 978–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Penttinen, I. (2019, June 20). All eyes on extractives legislation review. Retrieved from
  37. Persson, M. (2012, February 22). Kabinet wil Shell ontzien bij EU-regels. De Volkskrant. Retrieved from
  38. Publish What You Pay. (2018). Exploring the efficacy of the EU law concerning reports on payments to governments: Reflections from the EU. Retrieved from
  39. Renwick, N., Gu, J., & Hong, S. (2018). China and African Governance in the Extractive Industries. International Development Policy, 10(1).Google Scholar
  40. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (2001). Natural resources and economic development: The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 45, 827–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sala-i-Martin, X., & Subramanian, A. (2003). Addressing the natural resource curse: An illustration from Nigeria. Columbia University Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, Discussion Paper #:0203-15.Google Scholar
  42. Snow, N. (2017). Trump signs CR rescinding SEC foreign payment disclosure requirement. Oil & Gas Journal. Retrieved from
  43. Sovacool, B. K., Götz, W., Van de Graaf, T., & Andrews, N. (2016). Energy governance, transnational rules, and the resource curse: Exploring the effectiveness of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). World Development, 83, 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. UN General Assembly. (2008). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 11 September 2008: Strengthening transparency in industries. Retrieved from
  45. US Department of the Interior. (2017, November 2). Letter to EITI. Retrieved from
  46. Zhao, S. (2014). A Neo-Colonist predator or development partner? China’s engagement and rebalance in Africa. Journal of Contemporary China, 23(90), 1033–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals (IBEI)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations