China Contestation of the EU’s Promotion of the Responsibility to Protect: Between Solidarists and Sovereignists
- 351 Downloads
China and the EU are two international actors which have clearly differentiated international identities as well as perceptions and ideas about the rules which should guide the international system. In the area of humanitarian intervention to protect civilian populations from violence inflicted by their government, the EU and its member states have frequently defended the right and necessity of the international community to intervene to ensure against genocide. China has on occasion supported such a view, while on other insisting on sovereignty and non-intervention as fundamental norms trumping human rights. This chapter will explore the Chinese view of the principle of Responsibility to Protect and discuss the Chinese reaction to concrete humanitarian crises situations (Syria, Darfur and Libya). It will then compare and contrast with the EU and its member states’ views and explain how China’s norm contestation has influenced the EU’s approach to humanitarian crisis situations.
- Acharya, A. (2001). Human security: East versus West. International Journal, 56(3), 442–460.Google Scholar
- African Union. (1998). African Union charter. Retrieved from http://archive.ipu.org/idd-E/afr_charter.pdf.
- Annan, K. (1999). Annual report to general assembly, 1999. Retrieved by https://www.un.org/press/en/1999/19990920.sgsm7136.html.
- Barbé, E. (2013). Instituciones, normas y conflictos: los años devorados por las langostas. In Eva Vázque, Dolores Adam, & Noé Cornago (Eds.), El Arreglo Pacífico de Controversias Internacionales. Tirant lo Blanch: Valencia.Google Scholar
- Bellamy, A. J., & Wheeler, N. J. (2017). Humanitarian intervention in world politics. In J. Baylis, S. Smith, & P. Owen. The globalization of world politics. An introduction to international relations (pp. 514–528).Google Scholar
- Dembinksi, M., & Rienold, T. (2011). Libya and the future of the responsibility to protect–African and European perspectives. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt Report. (Vol. 107) (p. 1.30). Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2016). Shared vision, common action. A stronger Europe: A global strategy for the European Union’s foreign and security policy. Retrieved from http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf.
- European Union Statement. (2018). Debate on “the responsibility to protect and the prevention of genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity”. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/un-new-york/47293/node/47293_ka.
- Haas, R. (Jan/Feb 2019). How a world order ends: Wand what comes in its wake. Foreign Affairs, 98(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
- Hemmenway, D. (December 21, 2018). Chinese strategic engagement with Assad’s Syria. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/syriasource/chinese-strategic-engagement-with-assad-s-syria.
- House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee. (2018). Global Britain: The responsibility to protect and humanitarian intervention. Retrieved from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmfaff/1005/1005.pdf.
- Huang, Ch-H. (2017). Peacekeeping contributor profile: The people’s Republic of China. Providing for peace keeping. http://www.providingforpeacekeeping.org/2014/04/03/contributor-profile-china/
- Ikenberry, J. (Jan–Feb. 2008). The rise of China and the future of the West: Can the liberal system survive? Foreign Affairs, 87(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
- Kagan, R. (2003). Of paradise and power. America and Europe in the new world order. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
- Koenig, N. (2011). The EU and the Libyan crisis: In quest of coherence? Istituto Affari Internazionali.Google Scholar
- Kurtz, G., & Rotmann, P. (2016). The evolution of norms of protection: Major powers debate the responsibility to protect. Global Society, 30(1), 3–20.Google Scholar
- Mallet, J. C. (2008). Defense et securitý. Le Livre Blanc. Retrieved from http://bdc.aege.fr/public/Defense_et_securite_nationale_Livre_Blanc.pdf.
- March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (2011). The logic of appropriateness. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The oxford handbook of political science (pp. 478–495). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2004). Ambassador Li baodong chairs security council meeting on Libya. Retrieved from http://www.china-un.org/eng/zt/sccn201103/t809816.htm.
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2018). Counter-terrorism, dialogue and reconstruction are three key points for solving syrian issue at new stage. Retrieved from https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1514519.shtml.
- Panda, A. (2014, June 26th). “Reflecting on China’s five principles, 60 years later”. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2014/06/reflecting-on-chinas-five-principles-60-years-later/.
- Ramani, S. (September 22, 2016). China’s Syria agenda. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2016/09/chinas-syria-agenda/.
- Security Council. (2004). S/PV.5040. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/en/S/PV.5040.
- Security Council. (2006a). Resolution 1674. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/press/en/1999/19990920.sgsm7136.html.
- Security Council. (2006b). S/PV.5520. Retrieved from https://undocs.org/en/S/PV.5520.
- Security Council. (2011). Resolution 1970. Retrieved from http://unscr.com/en/resolutions/1970.
- Security Council Meeting. (2011). SC/10403. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/press/en/2011/sc10403.doc.htm.
- Slaughter, A. (2006). A new U.N. for a new Century. Fordham Law Review, 74(6).Google Scholar
- Smith, K. (2018). The EU and the responsibility to protect in a illiberal era. Dahrendorf Forum. Working Paper nº3.Google Scholar
- Thakur, R. (2006). The United Nations, peace and security. From collective security to the responsibility to protect. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- United Nations Human Rights Office. (2004). Press Release. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/press/en/2004/afr921.doc.htm.
- Whitman, R. (2011). Normative power Europe. Empirical and theoretical perspectives. New York: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
- Wiener, A. (2014). A Theory of Contestation. London: Springer.Google Scholar
- World Bank. (2018). Belt and road initiative. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/regional-integration/brief/belt-and-road-initiative.
- Zhong, Z. (2014). Ideational divergences between European Union and China: cases of international interventions. Doctoral Dissertation. Luis Guido Carli University and Université Libre de Bruxelles.Google Scholar