Skip to main content

Relations in Ontology-Driven Conceptual Modeling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11788))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

For over a decade now, a community of researchers has contributed to the ontological foundations of Conceptual Modeling by participating to the development of the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO) and the UFO-based modeling language OntoUML, which have been successfully employed in a number of different sectors. The empirical feedback from these experiences led us to reconsider UFO’s theory of relations, proposing a new theory that has already been applied to model subtle notions in the business domain, such as value, risk, service, and contract. In this paper, we advance a first formal characterization of this new theory, which is then used to design a new metamodel for OntoUML.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The taxonomy we are describing, depicted in Fig. 2, has been slightly changed with respect to UFO’s original one.

  2. 2.

    We stick to the term ‘mediation’ just for reasons of compatibility with previous papers. In the past we also used ‘involvement’, which is perhaps a better terminological alternative.

  3. 3.

    We only present an excerpt of the formalization here. The complete formalization is available at https://github.com/diporello/UFO-Ontology-of-Relations/.

  4. 4.

    The set of stereotypes for endurant types presented here is partial, but suffices for the interpretation of the discussed relations and examples. The complete list is drawn from [13].

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/nemo-ufes/OntoUML-2.0-for-Visual-Paradigm.

References

  1. Bera, P., Evermann, J.: Guidelines for using UML association classes and their effect on domain understanding in requirements engineering. Requirements Eng. 19(1), 63–80 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. de Carvalho, V.A., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G.: Using reference domain ontologies to define the real-world semantics of domain-specific languages. In: Jarke, M., et al. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 488–502. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Evermann, J.: The association construct in conceptual modelling – an analysis using the bunge ontological model. In: Pastor, O., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 33–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11431855_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitting, M., Mendelsohn, R.L.: First-Order Modal Logic, vol. 277. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Griffo, C., et al.: From an ontology of service contracts to contract modeling in enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of 21st EDOC (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G.: “We need to discuss the Relationship”: revisiting relationships as modeling constructs. In: Zdravkovic, J., Kirikova, M., Johannesson, P. (eds.) CAiSE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9097, pp. 279–294. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19069-3_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Guarino, N., Guizzardi, G.: Relationships and events: towards a general theory of reification and truthmaking. In: Adorni, G., Cagnoni, S., Gori, M., Maratea, M. (eds.) AI*IA 2016. LNCS, vol. 10037, pp. 237–249. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49130-1_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Guarino, N., et al.: On the ontological nature of REA core relations. In: Proceedings of 12th VMBO (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guarino, N., Sales, T.P., Guizzardi, G.: Reification and truthmaking patterns. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 151–165. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Guizzardi, G.: Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Telematica Instituut/CTIT (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: What’s in a relationship: an ontological analysis. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 83–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87877-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Guizzardi, G., et al.: Towards ontological foundations for conceptual modeling: the unified foundational ontology (UFO) story. Appl. Ontol. 10(3–4), 259–271 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guizzardi, G., Fonseca, C.M., Benevides, A.B., Almeida, J.P.A., Porello, D., Sales, T.P.: Endurant types in ontology-driven conceptual modeling: towards OntoUML 2.0. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 136–150. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G., de Almeida Falbo, R., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Almeida, J.P.A.: Towards ontological foundations for the conceptual modeling of events. In: Ng, W., Storey, V.C., Trujillo, J.C. (eds.) ER 2013. LNCS, vol. 8217, pp. 327–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Hovda, P.: What is classical mereology? J. Philos. Log. 38(1), 55–82 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Olivé, A.: Conceptual Modeling of Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39390-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Porello, D., Guizzardi, G.: Towards a cognitive semantics of types. In: Esposito, F., Basili, R., Ferilli, S., Lisi, F. (eds.) AI*IA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10640, pp. 428–440. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70169-1_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Porello, D., Guizzardi, G.: Towards an ontological modelling of preference relations. In: Ghidini, C., Magnini, B., Passerini, A., Traverso, P. (eds.) AI*IA 2018. LNCS, vol. 11298, pp. 152–165. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03840-3_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Russell, B.: Philosophical Essays. Routledge, Abingdon (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Sales, T.P.: Ontology validation for managers. Master’s thesis, UFES (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sales, T.P., Baião, F., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guarino, N., Mylopoulos, J.: The common ontology of value and risk. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 121–135. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Varzi, A.: Mereology. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2016 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Verdock, M., et al.: Comparing traditional conceptual modeling with ontology-driven conceptual modeling: an empirical study. Inf. Syst. 81, 92–103 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Verdonck, M., Gailly, F.: Insights on the use and application of ontology and conceptual modeling languages in ontology-driven conceptual modeling. In: Comyn-Wattiau, I., Tanaka, K., Song, I.-Y., Yamamoto, S., Saeki, M. (eds.) ER 2016. LNCS, vol. 9974, pp. 83–97. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46397-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Wand, Y., et al.: An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling. ACM Trans. Database Syst. (TODS) 24(4), 494–528 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, X., et al.: Towards an ontology of software: a requirements engineering perspective. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS), Rio de Janeiro (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudenir M. Fonseca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fonseca, C.M., Porello, D., Guizzardi, G., Almeida, J.P.A., Guarino, N. (2019). Relations in Ontology-Driven Conceptual Modeling. In: Laender, A., Pernici, B., Lim, EP., de Oliveira, J. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11788. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33222-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33223-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics