Skip to main content

Finding Preferred Objects with Taxonomies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11788))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Preferences about objects of interest are often expressed at different levels of granularity, not always matching the level of detail of stored data. For instance, we prefer rock to pop music, yet scheduled concerts only cite the name of the performer, with no reference to the musical genre. In this paper we address this common mismatch by leveraging the vast amounts of data organized in taxonomies (such as those found in electronic catalogs and classification systems) for propagating preferences from more generic to more specific concepts. This will help users to locate their preferred objects. In spite of its apparent simplicity, this problem requires special care in order to avoid some undesirable effects, e.g., when conflicting preferences at different levels have to be combined (although, generally, we prefer rock to pop music, we would never miss a performance by Madonna). We present a formal model to represent preferences and state the desirable properties of preference propagation, such as the fact that more specific preferences always prevail over more generic ones. We then propose a method for propagating preferences along taxonomies, complying with the stated properties, and show how preferred objects can thereby be efficiently determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Notice that, although according to Definition 5  \(\succeq \) is not a preference relation (since it is not a preorder), we still use the same symbol.

References

  1. Börzsönyi, S., Kossmann, D., Stocker, K.: The skyline operator. In: ICDE, pp. 421–430 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, C.Y., Jagadish, H.V., Tan, K., Tung, A.K.H., Zhang, Z.: Finding k-dominant skylines in high dimensional space. In: SIGMOD, pp. 503–514 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chomicki, J.: Preference formulas in relational queries. TODS 28(4), 427–466 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciaccia, P., Torlone, R.: Modeling the propagation of user preferences. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 304–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24606-7_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Golfarelli, M., Rizzi, S., Biondi, P.: myOLAP: An approach to express and evaluate OLAP preferences. TKDE 23(7), 1050–1064 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martinenghi, D., Torlone, R.: Querying databases with taxonomies. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 377–390. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16373-9_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Martinenghi, D., Torlone, R.: Taxonomy-based relaxation of query answering in relational databases. VLDB J. 23(5), 747–769 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B.: Introduction to recommender systems handbook. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P.B. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 1–35. Springer, Boston (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_1

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Stefanidis, K., Koutrika, G., Pitoura, E.: A survey on representation, composition and application of preferences in database systems. TODS 36(3), 19:1–19:45 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Torlone, R., Ciaccia, P.: Which are my preferred items? In: RPEC, pp. 217–225 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Torlone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ciaccia, P., Martinenghi, D., Torlone, R. (2019). Finding Preferred Objects with Taxonomies. In: Laender, A., Pernici, B., Lim, EP., de Oliveira, J. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11788. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33222-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33223-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics