Skip to main content

Measuring Anti-trafficking Enforcement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Fight against Human Trafficking
  • 276 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the reader will see how three global indices are compared using external validity test in order to identify which one of them is empirically related stronger to human trafficking. As the results of the comparison will demonstrate, Tier rankings are proven to be the most reliable measure of anti-trafficking enforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Babbie, E. R. (2013). The basics of social research. Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calandruccio, G. (2005). A review of recent research on human trafficking in the Middle East. International Migration, 43(1–2), 267–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprioli, M., Hudson, V. M., McDermott, R., Ballif-Spanvill, B., Emmett, C. F., & Stearmer, S. M. (2009). The Womanstats project database: Advancing an empirical research agenda. Journal of Peace Research, 46(6), 839–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S. Y. (2012). Modeling for determinants of human trafficking (Economics of Security Working Paper, 70).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S. Y., Dreher, A., & Neumayer, E. (2014). Determinants of anti-trafficking policies: Evidence from a new index. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(2), 429–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S. Y., & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2012). Compliance with the anti-trafficking protocol. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(2), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, J. A. (2006). The United States as global sheriff: Using unilateral sanctions to combat human trafficking. Michigan Journal of International Law, 27(2), 437–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Day, A. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings (Vol. 351). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, A. T. (2011). Improving the effectiveness of the international law of human trafficking: A vision for the future of the US Trafficking in Persons reports. Human Rights Review, 12(3), 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, A. T. (2017). What’s wrong with the Global Slavery Index? Anti-Trafficking Review (8), 90–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, A., Anderson, R., Kinnard, K., & Tran, H. (2014). Proper methodology and methods of collecting and analyzing slavery data: An examination of the Global Slavery Index. Social Inclusion, 2(4), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, D., & Rudolph, A. (2015). Modern day slavery: What drives human trafficking in Europe? European Journal of Political Economy, 38, 118–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, V. M., Ballif-Spanvill, B., Caprioli, M., & Emmett, C. F. (2012). Sex and world peace. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, V. M., Bowen, D. L., & Nielsen, P. L. (2011). What is the relationship between inequity in family law and violence against women? Approaching the issue of legal enclaves. Politics & Gender, 7(4), 453–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. M. (2002). The 2002 trafficking in persons report: Lost opportunity for progress. Foreign Government Complicity in Human Trafficking: A Review of the State Department’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. G., & Simmons, B. A. (2015). Politics by number: Indicators as social pressure in international relations. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. J. (2005). Human trafficking in East Asia: Current trends, data collection, and knowledge gaps. International Migration, 43(1–2), 165–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, N., & Yanagizawa, D. (2009). The strategic determinants of US human rights reporting: Evidence from the cold war. Journal of the European Economic Association, 7(2–3), 446–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stearmer, M., Emmett, C. F., & Stearmer, M. (2007). The great divide: Revealing differences in the Islamic world regarding the status of women and its impact on international peace (pp. 1–22). Paper prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Wyler, L. (2012). Trafficking in persons: International dimensions and foreign policy issues for Congress (pp. 1–34). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Global Slavery Index Report. (2016). Global Slavery Index (pp. 1–212). Available at www.globalslaveryindex.org.

  • The US Department of State. (2001–2014). Trafficking in Persons report. Retrieved from https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt//index.htm.

  • Van Dijk, J., & Klerx-Van Mierlo, F. (2014). Quantitative indices for anti-human trafficking policies: Based on reports of the US State Department and the Council of Europe. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61(2), 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzer, R. (2015). Human trafficking and contemporary slavery. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 223–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooditch, A. (2011). The efficacy of the trafficking in persons report: A review of the evidence. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22(4), 471–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ravlik, M. (2020). Measuring Anti-trafficking Enforcement. In: The Fight against Human Trafficking. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33204-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics