British ‘Hoodie’ Horror

  • Lauren StephensonEmail author


The British hoodie horror film has utilised several different landscapes, each of which demonstrates a fascinating relationship between the male characters of the narrative and their environment. Moreover, the hoodie horror’s use of landscape draws heavily on the British Gothic tradition. In this chapter, it is argued that hoodie horror’s use of the gothic landscape plays a vital role in exposing the various masculinities at odds within a hoodie horror film. This chapter hopes to utilise the dominance of the landscape in the hoodie horror narrative to investigate how contemporary issues of class and gender are framed by wider hierarchies of power, ownership and expectation. The landscape is a powerful tool for understanding the characters’ relationship with the state, their perception of class and their awareness of the wider rhetoric of which they are a part.


  1. Clarke, D. B. (ed.), The Cinematic City (London: Routledge, 1997).Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, K. ‘Punish the Feral Rioters, But Address Out Social Deficit Too’. The Guardian (05/09/11). [accessed 01/03/15].
  3. Connell, R. W. Masculinities (2nd ed.) (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005).Google Scholar
  4. Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (London: Penguin, 1991).Google Scholar
  5. Halberstam, J. Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters (London: Duke University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanley, L. Estates: An Intimate History (New Edition) (London: Granta Books, 2012).Google Scholar
  7. Hanley, L. ‘Look at Grenfell Tower and See the Terrible Price of Britain’s Inequality’, in The Guardian, 16/06/17. [accessed 17/06/18].
  8. Hatherley, O. Militant Modernism (Winchester: Zero Books, 2008).Google Scholar
  9. Higson, A. Dissolving Views: Key Writings on British Cinema (London: Cassell, 1996).Google Scholar
  10. Lombroso, C. Criminal Man (5th ed.) (London: Duke University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mayhew, H. London Labour and the London Poor: The Condition and Earnings of Those That Will Work, Cannot Work, and Will Not Work (London: Charles Griffin & Co., 1865).Google Scholar
  12. Murphy, B. M. The Rural Gothic in American Popular Culture: Backwoods Horror and Terror in the Wilderness (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Silverman, K. The Subject of Semiotics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  14. Simpson, M. J. ‘Interview: Jason Ford’. M.J. Simpson: Film Reviews and Interviews, 14/03/13. [accessed 06/07/18].
  15. Spicer, A. Typical Men: The Representation of Masculinity in Popular British Cinema (London: I.B. Tauris, 2003).Google Scholar
  16. Swafford, K. Class in Late-Victorian Britain: The Narrative Concern with Social Hierarchy and Its Representation (New York: Cambria Press, 2007).Google Scholar
  17. Tyler, I. Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain (London: Zed Books, 2013).Google Scholar
  18. Walker, J. Contemporary British Horror Cinema: Industry, Genre and Society (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. A Taste of Honey (dir. Tony Richardson, 1961).Google Scholar
  2. Alien (dir. Ridley Scott, 1979).Google Scholar
  3. Attack the Block (dir. Joe Cornish, 2011).Google Scholar
  4. The Blair Witch Project (dir. Eduardo Sanchez and Daniel Myrick, 1999).Google Scholar
  5. Candyman (dir. Bernard Rose, 1992).Google Scholar
  6. Cherry Tree Lane (dir. Paul Andrew Williams, 2010).Google Scholar
  7. Citadel (dir. Ciaran Foy, 2012).Google Scholar
  8. A Clockwork Orange (dir. Stanley Kubrick, 1971).Google Scholar
  9. Comedown (dir. Menhaj Huda, 2012).Google Scholar
  10. Community (dir. Jason Ford, 2012).Google Scholar
  11. Deliverance (dir. John Boorman, 1972).Google Scholar
  12. The Disappeared (dir. Johnny Kevorkian, 2008).Google Scholar
  13. Eden Lake (dir. James Watkins, 2008).Google Scholar
  14. The Goonies (dir. Richard Donner, 1985).Google Scholar
  15. The Great Ecstasy of Robert Carmichael (dir. Thomas Clay, 2005).Google Scholar
  16. Harry Brown (dir. Daniel Barber, 2009).Google Scholar
  17. The Haunting (dir. Robert Wise, 1963).Google Scholar
  18. Home Alone (dir. Christopher Columbus, 1990).Google Scholar
  19. It Follows (dir. David Robert Mitchell, 2014).Google Scholar
  20. Jaws (dir. Steven Spielberg, 1975).Google Scholar
  21. Long Weekend (dir. Colin Egglestone, 1978).Google Scholar
  22. Peeping Tom (dir. Michael Powell, 1960).Google Scholar
  23. Psycho (dir. Alfred Hitchcock, 1960).Google Scholar
  24. Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (dir. Karel Reisz, 1960).Google Scholar
  25. The Silence of the Lambs (dir. Jonathan Demme, 1991).Google Scholar
  26. Stake Land (dir. Jim Mickle, 2010).Google Scholar
  27. The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (dir. Tobe Hooper, 1974).Google Scholar
  28. Tower Block (dir. James Nunn & Ronnie Thompson, 2012).Google Scholar
  29. Urban Ghost Story (dir. Genevieve Jolliffe, 1998).Google Scholar
  30. The Walking Dead (Creator: Frank Darabont, 2010–Present).Google Scholar
  31. The Wicker Man (dir. Robin Hardy, 1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.York St. John UniversityYorkUK

Personalised recommendations