Abstract
This chapter observes developments in the complicated area of European post-Soviet states since the dismantling of the Soviet Union and the advent of the World Wide Web in relation to digital inequalities, so as to establish a framework of comparison for a deeper analysis covering European post-Soviet states by comparing Internet penetration, adoption, and use trends among different post-Soviet states. This allows for an understanding of forms of digital inequalities in terms of access and uses among European post-Soviet states. The countries are studied as individual states, and as two main blocks of Baltic states and Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) in Europe, to facilitate further categorisation of inequalities between the two blocks in terms of policy and practice and divides and inequalities in digital skills and use of the Internet, particularly in communication. The findings indicate clear differences in the region in terms of digital inequalities but, more interestingly, that the ranking of countries in different aspects remained more or less the same between 2014 and 2018. Either this stalemate can be interpreted as a common slowdown in the efforts towards digital diffusion and mending of digital inequalities between these years affecting the region or that the potential for development within the current environment has reached an impasse that requires a more fundamental societal change to be overcome.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Details on the information policy can be found at https://www.ega.ee/publication/principles-of-estonian-information-policy/.
References
Agarwal, R., Animesh, A., & Prasad, K. (2009). Research note—Social interactions and the “digital divide”: Explaining variations in Internet use. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 277–294.
Corrocher, N., & Ordanini, A. (2002). Measuring the digital divide: A framework for the analysis of cross-country differences. Journal of Information Technology, 17(1), 9–19.
Cruz-Jesus, F., Vicente, M. R., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2016). The education-related digital divide: An analysis for the EU-28. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.027.
Deviatko, I. F. (2013). Digitizing Russia: The uneven pace of progress toward ICT equality. In M. Ragnedda & G. W. Muschert (Eds.), The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective (pp. 118–133). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Dewan, S., & Riggins, F. J. (2005). The digital divide. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(12), 298–337.
DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. In Working paper series number 15. Princeton, NJ: Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University.
DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Celeste, C., & Shafer, S. (2004). Digital inequality, from unequal access to differentiated use. In K. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 355–400). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
EAS. (2018). e-Estonia showroom. e-Estonia. Retrieved May 25, 2018, from https://e-estonia.com/showroom/.
European Commission. (2018). DESI—Digital scoreboard – Data & indicators. European Commission.
Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621. Retrieved May 2018, from http://crx.sagepub.com/content/35/5/602.
Hilbert, M. (2014). Technological information inequality as an incessantly moving target: The redistribution of information and communication capacities between 1986 and 2010. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 821–835.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1998). Bridging the racial divide on the Internet. Science, 280, 390–391.
Howard, P., Busch, L., & Sheets, P. (2010). Comparing digital divides: Internet access and social inequality in Canada and the United States. Canadian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 109–128.
Hsieh, J. J., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 97–126.
Hsieh, J. P. A., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2011). Addressing digital inequality for the socioeconomically disadvantaged through government initiatives: Forms of capital that affect ICT utilization. Information Systems Research, 22(2), 233–253.
Information Policy. (1998). Концепция государственной информационной политики (The concept of state information policy). http://www.iis.ru/library/sip/sip.ru.html
Kalkun, M., & Kalvet, T. (2002). Digital divide in Estonia and how to bridge it. Look@World Foundation, the Open Estonia Foundation, and the State Chancellery.
Katz, J. E., & Aspden, P. (1997). Motives, hurdles and dropouts. Who is on and off the Internet and why. Communications of the ACM, 40(4), 97–102.
Klamus, V., Talvis, K., & Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P. (2013). Behind the slogan of “e-State”: Digital stratification in Estonia. In M. Ragnedda & G. W. Muschert (Eds.), The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective (pp. 193–206). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Kvasny, L., & Keil, M. (2006). The challenges of redressing the digital divide: A tale of two US cities. Information Systems Journal, 16(1), 23–53.
Lindsay, C. (2005). Employability, services for unemployed job seekers and the digital divide. Urban Studies, 42(2), 325–339.
Niehaves, B., & Plattfaut, R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: Employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 708–726.
Racherla, P., & Mandviwalla, M. (2013). Moving from access to use of the information infrastructure: A multilevel sociotechnical framework. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 709–730.
Ragnedda, M. (2017). The third digital divide: A Weberian analysis of digital inequalities. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Ragnedda, M. (2018). Conceptualizing digital capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35(8), 2366–2375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006.
Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (2013). The digital divide: The Internet and social inequality in international perspective. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Ragnedda, M., & Muschert, G. W. (Eds.). (2018). Theorizing digital divides. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Rohozinski, R. (1999). Mapping Russian cyberspace: Perspectives on democracy and the Net (115, October 1999). Geneva: UNRISD.
Runnel, P., Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P., & Reinsalu, K. (2009). The Estonian tiger leap from post-Communism to the information society: From policy to practice. Journal of Baltic Studies, 40, 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629770902722245.
Sipior, J. C., Ward, B. T., & Connolly, R. (2011). The digital divide and t-government in the United States: Using the technology acceptance model to understand usage. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(3), 308–328.
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media and Society, 16(3), 507–526.
van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & van Deursen, A. J. A. M. (2014). Digital skills, unlocking the information society. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vartanova, E. (2002). Digital divide and the changing political/media environment of post-socialist Europe. Gazette, 64, 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485020640050501.
Vartanova, E. (2004). The Russian network society. In M. Castells (Ed.), The network society: A cross-cultural perspective (pp. 84–98). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Vehovar, V., Sicherl, P., Hüsing, T., & Dolnicar, V. (2006). Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. The Information Society, 22, 279–290.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, F. D., & Davis, G. B. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Volchenko, O. V. (2016). Dinamika Tsifrovogo Neravenstva v Rossii [Dynamics of the digital inequality in Russia]. Monitoring of public opinion: Economic and social changes, 5, 163–182.
Wei, K. K., Teo, H. H., Chan, H. C., & Tan, B. C. Y. (2011). Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 170–187.
Witte, J. C., & Mannon, S. E. (2010). The Internet and social inequalities. New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kreitem, H., Ragnedda, M., Muschert, G.W. (2020). Digital Inequalities in European Post-Soviet States. In: Davydov, S. (eds) Internet in Russia. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33016-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33016-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-33015-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-33016-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)