Skip to main content

Gendering Migration Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The International Organization for Migration

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) formally adopted the principle of gender mainstreaming in 1995, at the same time as it embraced its new mandate in Toward the 21st Century. This chapter examines the process of ‘gendering’ the IOM, with particular attention to its understanding of transnational care chains. It argues that, in many ways, the IOM’s gender discourse has been shaped to fit the IOM’s migration management discourse, a discourse that forms part of the broader international migration narrative. On the issue of transnational care chains, however, the IOM has commissioned a set of important studies that break with the gendered subset of these narratives. The IOM’s closer relationship with the UN also holds the promise of increasing the impact of the more critical discourse on its field operations.

Research for this chapter was supported by the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada through the partnership grant on Gender Migration and the Work of Care. I benefited from research assistance of Masaya Llavaneras-Blanco and Sara Rose Taylor. Any errors or misunderstandings however are mine alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term ‘femocrat’ originated in Australia during the 1970s when numerous feminists were recruited into middle- and senior-level positions of government to advance women’s equality (Sawer 1990, 22). The term is now used to refer to those recruited into official positions because of their expertise on gender equality issues.

  2. 2.

    I am not claiming that the migration of women is a new phenomenon (see Schrover 2013 on earlier movements). Rather, I am referring to the ‘discovery’ of women as migrant workers that began in the 1990s (Mahon 2018).

  3. 3.

    See Mahon and Michel (2017) on the ILO and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and Mahon (2018) on the OECD and the World Bank.

  4. 4.

    See, for instance, Mahon and Michel (2017) and Mahon (2018) on the way these narratives appear in the discourse of the ILO, the World Bank and the OECD.

  5. 5.

    For this study, I have drawn on documentary evidence from the IOM. In addition to the annual reports for the IOM’s Council, these include the 1998 document on gender mainstreaming, the 2006 Evaluation of Gender Mainstreaming in the IOM, the IOM Gender Equality Policy 2015–2019, several key research reports commissioned by the Gender Unit, annual World Migration Reports and other Council documents.

  6. 6.

    The report also noted that ‘the former Deputy-Director (1994–1999) [Natalia Escala] already played a leading role in the development and implementation of IOM’s new gender policy strategy’ (10).

  7. 7.

    On gender strategies within the UN, see Hannan (2013).

  8. 8.

    This is not meant to suggest that all women migrant workers are employed in care work or that all women migrants leave behind young children or ageing parents. In areas like the Asia-Pacific, however, migrant domestic workers make up nearly one in five of all migrant workers in the region (ILO 2015, 16). The majority of these are women.

  9. 9.

    For instance, this is the dominant view within the World Bank and the OECD’s Development Centre (Mahon 2018).

  10. 10.

    Along with the 2003 and 2005 reports, this was one of the better reports with regard to incorporating gender into its analysis.

  11. 11.

    The IOM Gender Coordinating Unit is an active member of the Inter-Agency Network on Women and Gender Equality as well as the informal network of Geneva-based UN gender advisors (IOM CRP/36 2011, 3).

  12. 12.

    Some examples are its 2009 participation in a day of general discussion of migrant domestic workers, the 2011 support documentation on domestic workers for the regional (Jamaican) Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD) meeting with UN Women and participation in the joint UN Women-EU dialogue on domestic workers on International Women’s day that same year.

  13. 13.

    The IOM was appointed to service the negotiations, along with the UN Secretariat. It has also been given responsibility for coordinating the regional consultations with civil society groups.

Works Cited

  • Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. 1998. The Politics, Power and Pathology of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4): 699–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basok, Tanya, and Nicola Piper. 2012. Management vs Rights: Women’s Migration and Global Governance in Latin America and the Caribbean. Feminist Economics 18 (2): 35–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, Kate. 2009. Developing Partnerships: Gender, Sexuality and the Reformed World Bank. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caglar, Gülay, Elisabeth Prügl, and Susanne Zwingel, eds. 2013. Feminist Strategies in International Governance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, Sandra. 2012. “I Don’t Want to Be Stuck as a Carer”: Effects of Deskilling on the Livelihoods and Opportunities of Migrant Care Workers in England. In Crushed Hopes: Underemployment and Deskilling among Skilled Migrant Women, 37–76. Geneva: IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, Marie-Laure, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson. 2006. A World of Governance: The Rise of Transnational Regulation. In Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dostal, Jörg M. 2004. Campaigning on Expertise: How the OECD Framed European Union Welfare and Labour Market Policies and Why Success Could Lead to Failure. Journal of European Public Policy 11 (3): 440–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, M., and M. Koch. 2018. World Organizations in Migration Politics: The International Organization for Migration. Journal of International Organization Studies 9 (1): 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, Martin, and Antoine Pécoud. 2012. The Politics of International Migration Management. In The Politics of International Migration Management, ed. Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 1–20. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgi, Fabian. 2012. For the Benefit of Some: The International Organization for Migration and its Global Migration Management. In The Politics of International Migration Management, ed. Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 45–72. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guild, Elspeth, Stefanie Grant, and Kees Groenendijk. 2017. The IOM and the UN: Unfinished Business. Queen Mary, University of London, Legal Studies Research Paper 255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Carolyn. 2013. Feminist Strategies in International Organizations: The United Nations Context. In Feminist Strategies in International Governance, ed. Gülay Caglar, Elisabeth Prügl, and Susanne Zwingel, 74–91. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. 2015. ILO Global Estimates on Migrant Workers: Results and Methodology Special Focus on Migrant Domestic Workers. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM. 1998. Gender Mainstreaming in the International Organization for Migration. Geneva: IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Managing Migration – World Migration Report: Challenges and Responses for People on the Move. Geneva: IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. World Migration Report: Costs and Benefits of International Migration. Geneva: IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. World Migration Report: Managing Labour Mobility in the Evolving Global Economy. Geneva: IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009a. Working to Prevent and Address Violence Against Women Migrant Workers. Geneva: IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009b. Gender and Labour Migration in Asia. Geneva: IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. World Migration Report: Communicating Effectively About Migration. Geneva: IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Crushed Hopes: Underemployment and Deskilling Among Skilled Migrant Women. Geneva: IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Promoting the Health of Left-Behind Children of Asian Labour Migrants: Evidence for Policy and Action. Issue Brief 14 for the IOM and Migration Policy Institute Joint Series for Asia and the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM C/105/CRP/48. 2014. Director General’s Response to the Chair Person’s Report on the Working Group on IOM-UN Relations and IOM Strategy. 105th Session of Council, 26 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM C/106/INF/8/Rev.1. 2015. IOM Gender Equality Policy 2015–2019. 106th Session of Council, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM CRP/22. 2006. Evaluation of Gender Mainstreaming Policy and Strategy in IOM. Prepared by the Office of the Inspector General for the 92nd Session of Council, Geneva, 2 November–1 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM CRP/24. 2007. Report by the Working Group on Gender Issues on Gender Mainstreaming in the Organization. 94th Session of Council, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM CRP/26. 2008. Gender Coordination Report 2008. 96th Session of Council, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM CRP/28. 2009. Gender Coordination Report 2009. 98th Session of Council, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM COP/31. 2010. Gender Coordination Report 2010. Conference Room Paper/31 99th Session of the Council 29 November–2 December 2010, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM CRP/36. 2011. Gender Coordination Report 2011. 100th Session of Council, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM CRP/39. 2012. Gender Coordination Report 2012. 101st Session of Council, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM CRP/42. 2013. Gender Coordination Report 2013. 103rd Session of Council, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM CRP/43. 2013. Overview of UN Second High Level Dialogue on International Migration and Development: Outcomes for Global Migration Governance and Implications for IOM. 103rd Session of Council, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM S/105/CRP/21. 2014. Gender Coordination Report 2014. 105th Session of Council, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM/IDM. 2014. Migration and Families. Background Paper for the Inter-Sessional Workshop on Human Mobility and Development: Emerging Trends and New Opportunities for Partnerships, 7–8 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOM/UNIFEM. 2010. Uncovering the Interfaces Between Gender, Family, Migration and Development: The Global Care Economy and Chains. Annex to GFMD Roundtable 2.2 Background Paper. Prepared by Sylvia Lope-Ekra and Blandine Mollard (IOM) and Jean Cunha (UNIFEM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, De, Iren Messinger Sara, Theresa Schütz, and Gerd Valchars. 2017. The IOM “I Am a Migrant” Campaign. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik XXXIII: 75–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalm, Sara. 2012. Liberalizing Movements? The Political Rationality of Global Migration Management. In The Politics of International Migration Management, ed. Martin Geiger and Antoine Pécoud, 21–44. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneebone, Susan. 2010. The Governance of Labor Migration in Southeast Asia. Global Governance 16: 383–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krook, Mona Lena, and Jacqui True. 2012. Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The UN and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality. European Journal of International Relations 18 (1): 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Ekra, Sylvia, Christine Aghazavm, Henriette Kötter, and Blandine Mollard. 2011. The Impact of Remittances on Gender Roles and Opportunities for Children in Recipient Families: Research from the IOM. Gender and Development 19 (1): 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, Rianne. 2011. The Jobs Strategy: From Neo- to Inclusive Liberalism. Review of International Political Economy 18 (5): 570–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. The OECD, the World Bank and Transnational Care Chains: A “Wicked Problem”. Current Sociology 66 (4): 562–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, Rianne, and Sonya Michel. 2017. Not in Focus: Migrant Caregivers as Seen by the ILO and the OECD. In Gender, Migration and the Work of Care, ed. I. Peng and S. Michel, 138–171. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meld, Susanne. 2012. Transnational Families and the Social and Gender Impact of Mobility in ACP Countries. Background Note prepared for the ACP Observatory, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Mary K., and Elisabeth Prügl, eds. 1999. Gender Politics in Global Governance. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Carol. 1998. Gender Advocates and Multilateral Development Organizations: Promoting Change from within. In Missionaries and Mandarins: Feminist Engagement with Development Institutions, ed. C. Miller and S. Razavi, 9–20. Geneva: UNRISD.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pécoud, Antoine. 2015. Depoliticising Migration: Global Governance and International Migration Narratives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, Nicola. 2009. ‘Overview’ and ‘Conclusion’. In Gender and Labour Migration in Asia, 21–42 and 293–297. Geneva: IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, Shirin M., and Georgina Waylen, eds. 2008. Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawer, Marion. 1990. Sisters in Suits: Women and Public Policy in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrover, Marlou. 2013. Feminization and Problematization of Migration; Europe in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. In Proletarian and Gendered Mass Migration: A Global Perspective on Continuities and Discontinuities, ed. D. Hoerder and A. Kaur, 103–131. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. 2012. Un System-Wide Action Plan on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. https://undg.org/document/un-system-wide-action-plan-on-genderequality-and-the-empowerment-of-women/

  • UNFPA/IOM. 2006. Female Migration: Bridging the Gaps Throughout the Life Cycle: Selected Papers of the UNFPA-IOM Expert Group Meeting New York 2–3 May 2006. New York: UNFPA/IOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwingel, Susanne. 2013. ‘Translating International women’s Rights Norms: CEDAW in Context’. In Feminist Strategies in International Governance, ed. Gülay Caglar, Elisabeth Prügl and Susanne Zwingel. London: Routledge, pp. 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mahon, R. (2020). Gendering Migration Management. In: Geiger, M., Pécoud, A. (eds) The International Organization for Migration. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32976-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics