Skip to main content
Book cover

Ethical Approaches to Human Remains pp 39–58Cite as

What Remains? Human Rights After Death

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with the human rights of the deceased victims of mass atrocity. It addresses these rights in the context of forensic anthropological work to establish the individual and collective identities of the victims. This work became historically and politically significant in the later decades of the 20th century in the context of attempts to determine the numbers, identities, and cause of death of victims of state crimes and violent conflict, return their bodies to family members, and contribute evidence to legal trials for crimes such as crimes against humanity, genocide, torture, and enforced disappearance. Key amongst these efforts were attempts to recover and establish the identities of the dead who were subjected to torture and enforced disappearance in Argentina in the mid-1980s, and ongoing efforts to return human remains to families of the dead in the former-Yugoslavia following the wars of the 1990s. Our moral obligations to the dead in these contexts beg a profound and comprehensive ethical approach. With this in mind, this chapter addresses two key questions: do these dead have human rights? And if so, which specific rights do they have? This chapter puts forward some provisional lines of enquiry and argumentation for consideration. It provides resources and evidence—historical, legal, and forensic—in support of such rights, and makes several suggestions regarding which rights might be developed with respect to the dead.

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust [grant number 205488/Z/16/Z].

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32926-6_3
  • Chapter length: 20 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-32926-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a discussion of some relevant cases see Groen, Janaway and Márquez-Grant (2015).

  2. 2.

    For example, a coalition of family organisations formed a citizen-led forensics organisation in 2014. Gobernanza Forense Cuidadana put basic forensic DNA collection techniques into the hands of the families of the disappeared in order to generate a DNA database that might be used to identify the many unidentified dead. Other forensic methods deployed by families include search strategies which proceed by grids or transects.

  3. 3.

    The use of ‘missing’ here covers both the dead and the disappeared.

  4. 4.

    See the Colibrí Centre (2018) in Tucson, Arizona , for its work on migrant death on the US/Mexico border, and the Mediterranean Missing (2018) and Last Rights (2018) projects, amongst others, who work on migrant deaths on Europe’s borders. The International Committee of the Red Cross (2017) also provides support to families of missing migrants.

  5. 5.

    This research is the subject of a longer and ongoing study funded by the Wellcome Trust entitled ‘Human rights, human remains: forensic humanitarianism and the politics of the grave’ (2018–2021), led by the author of this chapter.

  6. 6.

    For an attempt see Rosenblatt (2010).

  7. 7.

    This ‘liberal scheme’ is the bedrock of contemporary human rights.

  8. 8.

    As a result of his work Dunant was selected as the joint inaugurating recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1901, along with French economist Frédéric Passy.

  9. 9.

    It is beyond the remit of this article to give a comprehensive history of the ICRC. For a good account see Forsythe (2005).

  10. 10.

    The ICRC is the only institution explicitly named under International Humanitarian Law as a controlling authority, which means that it has a legal right to visit anyone captured in the context of international armed conflict, including situations of occupation, on the basis of the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols (ICRC 1949a, articles 9 and 126; ICRC 1949b, articles 10 and 143, and Additional Protocol 1, article 81).

  11. 11.

    Note that I am making a deliberate distinction here between ‘the missing’ and ‘the disappeared’. ‘The missing’ covers those missing in action (MIA) during conflict, yet ‘the disappeared’ refers to those missing or killed in the context, usually, of state crimes against citizens such as during Argentina’s ‘Dirty War’ or during Pinochet’s rule of Chile from 1973 to 1990. ‘Enforced disappearance’ is a crime that emerged out of Latin American experiences of authoritarianism, and is now firmly lodged in the lexicon of ‘crimes against humanity’.

  12. 12.

    Another example included the establishment of a special Red Cross agency, which made enquiries in hospitals across London to search for missing soldiers. The search for the missing continues to form an important part of the mandate of the Red Cross today.

  13. 13.

    The main site of elaboration of these protocols is IHL (for which the ICRC is a controlling authority) as discussed in the previous section on international law (see International Committee of the Red Cross 2005, Rules 112–117). The ICRC has also produced a number of guides on best practices for the management of the dead (see for example Cordner et al 2016; International Committee of the Red Cross 2004, 2006).

  14. 14.

    I am here referring to the symbolic power of forensic work to domain the dead. This is notwithstanding the various and often significant practical obstacles to identification such as the sometimes high numbers of bodies, co-mingled remains, and the difficulties associated with extracting DNA from cremated or preserved remains.

  15. 15.

    There are further practical aspects of exhumation and identification that dignity might shape. For example, it might translate into the use of screens around excavation sites to protect human remains from public view or the minimisation of any damage to the remains. One such measure might include, for example, avoiding the extraction of the femur to establish stature and, instead, using CT scans. This, arguably, respects the integrity (and hence dignity) of the dead by avoiding any unnecessary disarticulation of human remains.

  16. 16.

    I have derived this formulation primarily in relation to the forensic recovery and identification of the dead in the context of contemporary human rights investigations and forensic humanitarian work. At the same time I would suggest that this rights formula could potentially be applied to other cases, such as to those of unidentified human remains currently held in museums.

References

  • Barnett, M. 2011. Empire of Humanity: A History of Humanitarianism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddington, P. 1998. Organ Donation After Death—Should I Decide or Should My Family? Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1): 69–81.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. 2018. Argentina’s Missing Bones: Revisiting the History of the Dirty War. Oakland: University of California Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Colibrí Centre. 2018. The Missing Migrant Project. http://www.colibricenter.org/. Accessed 28 May 2018.

  • Cordner, S., R. Coninx, H. J. Kim, et al. (eds.). 2016. Management of Dead Bodies After Disasters: A Field Manual for Responders, 2nd ed. International Committee of the Red Cross, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization, World Health Organization Regional Office of the Americas, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. [1966] 2002. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunant, H. [1862] 1959. A Memory of Solferino. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. [1895] 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method and Selected Texts on Sociology and Its Method. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. [1898] 1994. Social Facts. In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science, ed. M. Martin and L. McIntyre, 433–440. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emson, H.E. 2003. It is Immoral to Require Consent for Cadaver Organ Donation. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3): 125–127.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Forsythe, D.P. 2005. The Humanitarians: The International Committee of the Red Cross. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • González Ruibal, A., and G. Moshenska (eds.). 2015. Ethics and the Archaeology of Violence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groen, W.J.M., R.C. Janaway, and N. Márquez-Grant. 2015. Forensic Archeology: A Global Perspective. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hague Peace Conference. 1907. Hague Convention (IV) Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land and Its Annex: Regulations Concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land. In International Peace Conference, The Hague, 18 October 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. 2003. Organ Procurement: Dead Interests, Living Needs. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3): 130–134.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Heinle, K., O.R. Ferreira, and D. Shirk. 2017. Drug Violence in Mexico: Data and Analysis Through 2016. San Diego: Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Missing Persons. 2018. Missing Migrants Program for the Mediterranean Region. The Hague: International Commission on Missing Persons. https://www.icmp.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/12.1-Missing-Migrants-English.pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2018.

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. 1894. Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field, 22 August. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. 1949a. Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (Fourth Geneva Convention), 12 August. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. 1949b. Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (Third Geneva Convention), 12 August. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. 1977. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. 2003. Progress Report: The Missing: Action to Resolve the Problem of People Unaccounted for as a Result of Armed Conflict or Internal Violence and to Assist Their Families. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. 2004. Operational Best Practices Regarding the Management of Human Remains and Information on the Dead by Non-Specialists. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. 2005. Customary International Humanitarian Law: Volume I Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. 2006. The Missing: Action to Resolve the Problem of People Unaccounted for as a Result of Armed Conflict or Internal Violence and to Assist Their Families. ICRC Progress Report. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. 2017. Missing Migrants. https://www.icrc.org/en/missing-migrants. Accessed 28 May 2018.

  • Interpol. 1996. General Assembly on Disaster Victim Identification, 23–29 October. Lyon: Interpol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, F. 2017. Data, Detection and the Redistribution of the Sensible in International Law. American Journal of International Law 111: 57–103.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, T. 2002. The Dead Body and Human Rights. In The Body, ed. S.T. Sweeney and I. Hodder, 75–93. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, T. 2015. The Work of the Dead: A Cultural History of Mortal Remains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Last Rights. 2018. Last Rights. http://lastrights.net/. Accessed 28 May 2018.

  • Mauss, M. [1935] 1973. Techniques of the Body. Economy and Society 2 (1): 70–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mediterranean Missing. 2018. The Project. http://www.mediterraneanmissing.eu/. Accessed 28 May 2018.

  • Moon, C. 2008. Narrating Political Reconciliation: South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, C. 2013. Interpreters of the Dead: Forensic Knowledge, Human Remains and the Politics of the Past. Social & Legal Studies 22 (2): 149–169.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, C. 2016. Human Rights, Human Remains: Forensic Humanitarianism and the Human Rights of the Dead. International Social Science Journal 65 (215–216): 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Society Foundations. 2016. Undeniable Atrocities: Confronting Crimes Against Humanity in Mexico. New York: Open Society Foundations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, A. 2010. International Forensic Investigations and the Human Rights of the Dead. Human Rights Q 32 (4): 922–951.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, A. 2015. Digging for the Disappeared: Forensic Science After Atrocity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J. 2003. Death, Us and Our Bodies: Personal Reflections. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3): 127–130.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz-Marin, E., and A. Cruz-Santiago. 2016. Forensic Civism: Articulating Science, DNA and Kinship in Contemporary Mexico and Colombia. Human Remains and Violence 2 (1): 58–74.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, K.R. 2009. Rights of the Dead. Hofstra Law Review 37 (3): 763–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L., and J.R. Greisemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’, and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tidball-Binz, M. 2012. For Whom the Bell Tolls: The Development of Humanitarian Forensic Action. Keynote Speech. Paper presented at Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 7 June 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1945. Charter of the United Nations. 24 October. San Francisco: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly. 1998. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Last Amended 2010). New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2016. Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death. New York and Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to Kirsty Squires and Nick Márquez-Grant for their generous and thoughtful help during the writing process. I would especially like to thank Nick Márquez-Grant for his suggestions as to how the preservation of the dignity of human remains might translate further into forensic practice. I am also grateful to Ricardo Bravo (Héctor Ricardo Bravo Santillán) at the Centro de Docencia y Económicas (CIDE), Aguascalientes, México, for his comments on an earlier version of my argument, presented at CIDE in March 2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, UK

    Claire Moon

Authors
  1. Claire Moon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Moon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Policing and Forensics, Staffordshire University, Science Centre, Stoke-on-Trent, UK

    Dr. Kirsty Squires

  2. Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, UK

    Dr. David Errickson

  3. Defence Academy of the United Kingdom, Cranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Shrivenham, UK

    Dr. Nicholas Márquez-Grant

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moon, C. (2019). What Remains? Human Rights After Death. In: Squires, K., Errickson, D., Márquez-Grant, N. (eds) Ethical Approaches to Human Remains. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32926-6_3

Download citation