Skip to main content

Kant on the Generality of Model-Based Reasoning in Geometry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology (MBR 2018)

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 49))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 385 Accesses

Abstract

Kant can be seen as the philosophical ancestor of contemporary attempts to articulate the epistemological and practical significance of model-based reasoning. His recognition of the role of singular, immediate representations, or intuitions, in synthetic judgment–and thus in our ampliative claims about the world–is not only central to his philosophical program, but also grounded in many of the same insights that underwrite the contemporary MBR research program. Kant’s account of the necessary role of intuition in synthetic judgment is introduced by way of his philosophy of mathematics. Mathematics, and most significantly Euclidean geometry, is what first opens Kant’s eyes to the crucial role of what we would now call models in establishing contentful, novel claims about the world. Similarly, contemporary work in model-based reasoning in mathematics has also focused on Euclidean geometry (Giardino 2017). In this paper, I hope to bring out some of the ways that Kant’s reflections on geometry not only anticipate this contemporary work, but also rest on the very same features of Euclidean proof. Furthermore, some of the challenges faced by Kant’s model-based account of geometrical reasoning are still very much with us.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The connection between Peirce, Kant, and model-based reasoning in geometry has been usefully developed in prior work by Magnani (2001), as well as extended, perhaps, to non-Euclidean geometry by Torretti (2001).

References

  • Friedman M (1992) Kant and the exact sciences. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardino V (2017) Diagrammatic reasoning in mathematics. In: Magnani L, Bertolotti T (ed) Springer handbook of model-based science. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin W (2018) Conflicting conceptions of construction in Kant’s philosophy of geometry. Perspect Sci 26(1):97–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin W (2010) Coffa’s Kant and the evolution of accounts of mathematical necessity. Synthese 172:361–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin W (2003) Kant’s philosophy of geometry, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath T (1956) The thirteen books of Euclid’s elements, vol 1. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1964) The critique of pure reason (trans: Kemp-Smith N). St. Martin’s Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1977) Prolegomena to any future metaphysics (trans: Carus P, revised: Ellington J). Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I (1992) On the form and principles of the sensible and intelligible world. In: Walford D (ed) Theoretical philosophy, 1755–1770 (trans: Walford D). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBeth D (2010) Diagrammatic reasoning in Euclid’s elements. In: Van Kerkhove B, De Vuyst J, Van Bendegem JP (eds) Philosophical perspectives on mathematical practice, vol 12. College Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnani L (2001) Philosophy and Geometry: theoretical and historical issues. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manders K (2008a) Diagram-based geometric practice. In: Mancosu P (ed) The philosophy of mathematical practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Manders K (2008b) The Euclidean diagram (1995). In: Mancosu P (ed) The philosophy of mathematical practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow G (1970) Proclus a commentary on the first book of Euclid’s elements (trans: 1970). Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Netz R (1999) The shaping of deduction in greek mathematics: a study in cognitive history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce C S (1958–1966) The Collected Papers: Peirce CS. In: Hartshorne C, Weiss P (ed). Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Torretti R (2001) Philosophy and geometry: theoretical and historical issues (Review: Magnani L). Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 34:158–160

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Goodwin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Goodwin, W. (2019). Kant on the Generality of Model-Based Reasoning in Geometry. In: Nepomuceno-Fernández, Á., Magnani, L., Salguero-Lamillar, F., Barés-Gómez, C., Fontaine, M. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. MBR 2018. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32722-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics