Skip to main content

Microgenesis of Remembering: A Conversational Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 813 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSPCDS))

Abstract

This chapter describes an extension of Bartlett’s method of repeated reproduction, using War of the Ghosts, into a conversation task. In order to force participants to naturalistically externalize their process of remembering (i.e., think aloud), they were asked to recall the story with another person. Analysis shows the processes that lead to many of the changes into the story outlined by Bartlett, such as transformation of foreign place names, atmospheric weather, the reorganization of narrative structure, and more generally how construction of memories occurs (toward either accuracy or inaccuracy). There was however also differences in the data compared to Bartlett (Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1932) in the cultural resources participants used to reconstruct the story. One of the most interesting was the use of recent Hollywood films about ghosts to interpret and remember the Native American story. The chapter concludes with a broader discussion of the work of suggestion as a cultural tool in remembering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1916). Transformations arising from repeated representation: A contribution towards an experimental study of the process of conventionalisation. Fellowship Dissertation, St. John’s College, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1920). Some experiments on the reproduction of folk stories. Folk-Lore, 31, 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1928a). Social constructiveness: Pt. 1. British Journal of Psychology, 18, 388–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1928b). An experiment upon repeated reproduction. Journal of General Psychology, 1, 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, H. (1998). Memory states and memory tasks: An integrative framework for eyewitness memory and suggestibility. Memory, 6, 481–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & McNeil, D. (1966). The ‘tip of the tongue’ phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(4), 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Middleton, D. (1987). Conversation and remembering: Bartlett revised. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund, R. D., Brelsford, J. W., & Atkinson, R. C. (1969). Recognition vs. recall: Storage or retrieval differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 214–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2010). Studying the movement of thought. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray (pp. 69–88). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, J. D. (2009). The disappearance of the social in American social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1992). On collective memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (original publication 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, D., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. (1975). Leading questions and the Eyewitness Report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 550–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall, R. (1904). Recognition vs. recall. Journal of Philosophy, 1, 299–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marková, I. (1987). On the interaction of opposites in psychological processes. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17, 279–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, D. J., & Edwards, D. (1990a). Conversational remembering: A social psychological approach. In D. J. Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering (pp. 23–45). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. New York, NY: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motzkau, J. F. (2009). Exploring the transdiciplinary trajectory of suggestibility. Subjectivity, 27, 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K. & Fivush, R. (2004). Socialization of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 283–295). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeberst, A., & Blank, H. (2012). Undoing suggestive influence on memory: The reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect. Cognition, 125, 141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L., Jenkins, W. O., & Postman, D. L. (1948). An experimental comparison of active recall and recognition. The American Journal of Psychology, 511–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2003). Beyond social representations: A theory of enablement. Papers on Social Representations, 12, 7.1–7.16. Retrieved March 2005, from http://www.psr.jku.at.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2017). The Sinnlichkeit of panoramic experience. In B. Wagoner, I. Brescó, & S. H. Awad (Eds.), The psychology of imagination: History, theory and new research horizons. Charlotte, N.C: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, B., & Gillespie, A. (2014). Sociocultural mediators of remembering: An extension of Bartlett’s method of repeated reproduction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 605–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160–1175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1956). Microgenesis and aphasia. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 52, 347–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wagoner, B., Brescó, I., Awad, S.H. (2019). Microgenesis of Remembering: A Conversational Study. In: Remembering as a Cultural Process . SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32641-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics