Skip to main content

Diagnosing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Action Research in Software Engineering
  • 1377 Accesses

Abstract

The first phase of action research is diagnosing the problem to be addressed. Although it seems to be a straightforward task, diagnosing can be difficult as we need to understand the context of the project and the theories needed to take action. In this chapter, we explore different ways of diagnosing the problem—starting from observational ones like interviews and finishing up with analytical ones like statistical data analysis from experiment systems.

The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding.

—Leonardo da Vinci

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mike Allen. The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE Publications, 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Conklin and G. Hayhoe. Focus group workshop. In 2010 IEEE International Professional Comunication Conference, pages 273–274, July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. David L Cooperrider and Suresh Srivastva. Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in organizational change and development, 1(1):129–169, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David L Cooperrider, Diana Whitney, et al. A positive revolution in change: Appreciative inquiry. Public administration and public policy, 87:611–630, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paul M Duvall, Steve Matyas, and Andrew Glover. Continuous integration: improving software quality and reducing risk. Pearson Education, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. William Foddy and William H Foddy. Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research. Cambridge university press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. John Hughes, Val King, Tom Rodden, and Hans Andersen. Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 429–439. ACM, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Danny L Jorgensen. The methodology of participant observation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pages 12–26, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Danny L Jorgensen. Participant observation. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource, pages 1–15, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Kontio, L. Lehtola, and J. Bragge. Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences. In Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE ’04., pages 271–280, Aug 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ron Kohavi and Stefan Thomke. The surprising power of online experiments. Harvard Business Review, 95(5):74, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  12. David Issa Mattos, Pavel Dmitriev, Aleksander Fabijan, Jan Bosch, and Helena Holmström Olsson. An activity and metric model for online controlled experiments. In International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, pages 182–198. Springer, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anselm Strauss and Juliet M Corbin. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carolyn B Seaman. Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Transactions on software engineering, (4):557–572, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mary Shaw. What makes good research in software engineering? International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 4(1):1–7, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miroslaw Staron and Wilhelm Meding. Software Development Measurement Programs: Development, Management and Evolution. Springer, 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Miroslaw Staron, Wilhelm Meding, and Klas Palm. Release readiness indicator for mature agile and lean software development projects. In International Conference on Agile Software Development, pages 93–107. Springer, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Staron, M. (2020). Diagnosing. In: Action Research in Software Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32610-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32610-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32609-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32610-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics