Abstract
The first phase of action research is diagnosing the problem to be addressed. Although it seems to be a straightforward task, diagnosing can be difficult as we need to understand the context of the project and the theories needed to take action. In this chapter, we explore different ways of diagnosing the problem—starting from observational ones like interviews and finishing up with analytical ones like statistical data analysis from experiment systems.
The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding.
—Leonardo da Vinci
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Mike Allen. The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE Publications, 2017.
J. Conklin and G. Hayhoe. Focus group workshop. In 2010 IEEE International Professional Comunication Conference, pages 273–274, July 2010.
David L Cooperrider and Suresh Srivastva. Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in organizational change and development, 1(1):129–169, 1987.
David L Cooperrider, Diana Whitney, et al. A positive revolution in change: Appreciative inquiry. Public administration and public policy, 87:611–630, 2001.
Paul M Duvall, Steve Matyas, and Andrew Glover. Continuous integration: improving software quality and reducing risk. Pearson Education, 2007.
William Foddy and William H Foddy. Constructing questions for interviews and questionnaires: Theory and practice in social research. Cambridge university press, 1994.
John Hughes, Val King, Tom Rodden, and Hans Andersen. Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pages 429–439. ACM, 1994.
Danny L Jorgensen. The methodology of participant observation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, pages 12–26, 1989.
Danny L Jorgensen. Participant observation. Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences: An interdisciplinary, searchable, and linkable resource, pages 1–15, 2015.
J. Kontio, L. Lehtola, and J. Bragge. Using the focus group method in software engineering: obtaining practitioner and user experiences. In Proceedings. 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2004. ISESE ’04., pages 271–280, Aug 2004.
Ron Kohavi and Stefan Thomke. The surprising power of online experiments. Harvard Business Review, 95(5):74, 2017.
David Issa Mattos, Pavel Dmitriev, Aleksander Fabijan, Jan Bosch, and Helena Holmström Olsson. An activity and metric model for online controlled experiments. In International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, pages 182–198. Springer, 2018.
Anselm Strauss and Juliet M Corbin. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Inc, 1990.
Carolyn B Seaman. Qualitative methods in empirical studies of software engineering. IEEE Transactions on software engineering, (4):557–572, 1999.
Mary Shaw. What makes good research in software engineering? International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 4(1):1–7, 2002.
Miroslaw Staron and Wilhelm Meding. Software Development Measurement Programs: Development, Management and Evolution. Springer, 2018.
Miroslaw Staron, Wilhelm Meding, and Klas Palm. Release readiness indicator for mature agile and lean software development projects. In International Conference on Agile Software Development, pages 93–107. Springer, 2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Staron, M. (2020). Diagnosing. In: Action Research in Software Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32610-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32610-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32609-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32610-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)