Abstract
In past five decades (post 1960), humans have severely manipulated ecosystems of the country than ever before. Various natural and human induced factors have been direct or indirect drivers severely affecting ecosystems and biodiversity. However, impacts’ of these drivers have been seldom analyzed and hence, they remain mostly unidentified. Socio-economics is a relevant indirect driver that significantly affects the ecosystem functioning, by affecting the overall ecosystem goods and services. Socio-economic evaluations are fundamental to understand the scenarios and requirement of appropriate local and regional policy interventions that are desired to fit to the location specific requirements and dynamic patterns, coupled with the intrinsic ecosystems changes. Demands of life supporting biomass and exploitation of other forest resources are closely associated to local socio-economics. The forests of Central Himalayas are biodiversity hotspots and source of many ecosystem goods and services for the entire country. These forests appear to be limitless sources of provisioning, regulating, and supporting and cultural ecosystem services. Forests in Central Himalayas have been severely exploited in last few decades for various essential and subsistence demands of locals as well as other larger demands for development in the country. Degraded forest ecosystems generate limited goods and services and are not able to support good quality of life of marginal communities. It is vital to address dependence and requirements improving socio-economics of locals that leads to sustainable utilization of forest resources. Present chapter investigates socio-economic reasons, affecting forest health in Central Himalayas. Dynamics of social and economical set up driving change in forest resource use is imperative to identify opportunities for adaptive and sustainable forest management. Present study provides perspectives based on literature reviews, primary data collected from fields and socio-economic surveys based on informal group discussions and focused personal interviews. Study focuses on the need of developing and supporting existing local forest governance institutions for effective conservation of forests. Paper looks into future prospects and research needs concerning the assessment and management of forest ecosystem services by addressing socio-economics by targeting long-term conservation initiatives to achieve long term and short term biodiversity conservation targets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
CBD (2012a) Aichi biodiversity targets. https://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/. Accessed 20 Jan 2017
Census (2011) http://censusindia.gov.in/2011-common/censusdataonline.html. Accessed on 2 Jan 2017
Census (2001) http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/Census_Data_Online.html. Accessed on 2 Jan 2017
Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of the forest type of India. Manager of Publications, Government of India, New Delhi
Chapin III FS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor R, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack MC, Diaz S (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242
Chapin III FS, Sala OE, Huber-Sannwald E (eds) (2001) Global Biodiversity in a changing environment. Scenarios for the 21st Century. Springer, New York
CHEA (2009) Kyoto: think global, act local project. Central Himalayan Environment Association, Nainital
Dhyani S, Maikhuri RK, Dhyani D (2011) Energy budget of fodder harvesting pattern along the altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya, India. J Biomass Bioenergy 35(5):1823–1832
Dhyani S, Maikhuri RK, Dhyani D (2013) Utility of fodder banks for reducing women drudgery and anthropogenic pressure from forests of Western Himalaya. Natl Acad Sci Lett 36(4):453–460
Dhyani S, Dhyani D (2016) Significance of provisioning ecosystem services from moist temperate forest ecosystems: lessons from upper Kedarnath valley, Garhwal, India. Energy Ecol Environ 1(02):109–121
Diaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J et al (2015) The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:1–16 (2015). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002. Accessed 20 Jan 2017
FSI (Forest Survey of India) (2003) State of Forest Report, 2015. Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change. Dehradun, India
FSI (Forest Survey of India) (2007) State of Forest Report, 2015. Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change. Dehradun, India
FSI (Forest Survey of India) (2009) State of Forest Report, 2015. Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change. Dehradun, India
FSI (Forest Survey of India) (2013) State of Forest Report, 2015. Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change. Dehradun, India
FSI (Forest Survey of India) (2015) State of Forest Report, 2015. Forest Survey of India, Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change. Dehradun, India
Garbyal SS, Aggarwal KK, Babu CR (2004) Impact of Cordyceps sinensis in the rural economy of interior villages of Dharchula sub-division of Kumaon Himalayas and its implications in the society. Indian J Knowl 3:182–186
GBPIHEDENVIS (2015) Forest statistics data 2015–16. http://gbpihedenvis.nic.in/Forest_Data.html. Accessed on 2 Jan 2017
Government of India (2008) National Biodiversity Action Plan, Ministry of Environment and Forests
Haberl H, Erb KH, Plutzar C, Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F (2007) Human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) as indicator for pressures on biodiversity. In: Hak T, Moldan B, Dahl AL (eds) Sustainability indicators. A scientific assessment. SCOPE. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 271–288
Hall P, Bawa K (1993) Methods to assess the impact of extraction of non-timber tropical forest products on plant populations. Econ Botany 47:234–247
Hughes AC (2017) Understanding the drivers of Southeast Asian biodiversity loss. Ecosphere 8(1):e01624. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1624
IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp
IUCN (2001) IUCN red list categories and criteria version 3.1, Prepared by the IUCN Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland
Jodha NS (2001) Global environmental changes and economic globalization: old and new resources of risks in mountain areas. ICIMOD Newsl 40:11–12
Kumar B, Upreti DK (2008) An account of lichens of fallen twigs of three Quercus species in Chopta forest of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Ann Forestry 16(1):92–98
Kumar B (2009) Lichen resource use pattern and its socioeconomic status in temperate region of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Nat Sci 7(2):101–106
Maikhuri RK, Rao KS (2005) Developing eco-tourism for Nanda Devi biosphere reserve (A world heritage site) strategies and action plan. Brochure. Kosi, Almora: G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, 17p
(MEA) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Misra S, Maikhuri RK, Kala CP, Rao KS, Saxena KG (2008) Wild leafy vegetables: a study of their subsistence dietetic support to the inhabitants of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed, 18–32
Misra S (2008) Tracking the Lichen. Detale http://cseindia.org/userfiles/Detale1.pdf. Accessed on 5 Jan 2017
Misra S, Maikhuri RK, Dhyani D, Rao KS (2009) Assessment of traditional rights, local interferences and natural resource management issues in Garhwal part of Indian Himalayan Region. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 16(6):404–416
Misra S (2009) Impact of natural and man-made disturbances on vegetation structure and diversity in Guptakashi Range of Kedarnath Forest division, Uttarakhand. Ph.D. Thesis Forest Research Institute University, Dehradun, p 150
Negi CS (2006) Morels (Morchella spp.) in Kumaun Himalaya. Nat Prod Rad 5(4):306–310
Pandeya H, Yadava AK (2016) Forest consumption pattern in relation to socio-economic arrangement of people in Western Ramganga Watershed in Central Himalaya, India, Uttarakhand. Int J Recent Sci Res 7(1):8267–8275
Place F, Keijiro O (2000) Population pressure, land tenure and tree resource management in Uganda. Land Econ 76(2):233–251
Prasad P, Chauhan K, Kandari LS, Maikhuri RK, Purohit A, Bhatt RP, Rao KS (2002) Morchella esculenta: need for scientific intervention for its cultivation in Central Himalaya. Curr Sci 82:1098–1122
Sharma S (2004) Trade of Cordyceps sinensis from high altitudes of the Indian Himalaya: conservation and biotechnological priorities. Curr Sci 86:1614–1619
Shah NC (1997) Lichens of economic importance from the hills of Uttar Pradesh, India. J Herbs Spices Med Plant 5:69–76.
Singh RD, Gumber S, Tewari P, Singh SP (2016) Nature of forest fires in Uttarakhand: frequency, size and seasonal patterns in relation to pre-monsoonal Environment. Curr Sci 111(2):398–403
Singh SK, Rawat GS (2000) Morel mushroom industry in India. Plant Talk 21:36–37
Upreti DK, Divakar PK, Nayaka S (2005) Econ Bot 59:269. https://doi.org/10.1663/0013-0001(2005)059[0269:CAEUOL]2.0.CO;2
Tittensor DP, Walpole M, Hill SLL, Boyce DG, Britten GL, Burgess ND (2014) A mid-term analysis of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257484 (Assessed on 20 Jan 2017)
Uttarakhand State Forest Department (2016) Uttarakhand Forest Statistics 2014–15. Dehradun India, p 196
Ved DK, Kinhal GA, Ravikumar K, Prabhakaran V, Ghate U, Vijaya SR, Indresha JH (2003) Conservation assessment and management prioritisation for the medicinal plants of Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir and Uttaranchal. Foundation for Revitalisation of Local Health Traditions, Bangalore, India
WII ENVIS (2016) Annual progress report of ENVIS Centre on ‘Wildlife and Protected Areas’, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun 2016–17. http://gbpihedenvis.nic.in/. Assessed on 2 Jan 2017
Acknowledgements
Authors acknowledge the support of our informants who shared their knowledge in the study. Authors thank Dr. R.K. Maikhuri from GBPNIHESD, Srinagar Garhwal Unit and Director, CSIR-NEERI, Nagpur for their encouragement and support. Authors especially acknowledge Shri. S.P. Negi Senior IFS, HFRI, Shimla Himachal Pradesh for his constructive comments to improve this manuscript. Financial support for the study from UNEP Grant No. GAP-5-2161 (2016–17), TSBF/GEF/CIAT/UNEP grant (2004–09), DST SYSP (No. SP/YO/024/2008) (2009–2012) and Rufford Small Grants Programme, UK (Grant No. 10326) (2013–14) is acknowledged. Manuscript is checked for plagiarism and KRC, CSIR-NEERI is acknowledged under the number CSIR-NEERI/KRC/2018/APRIL/WTMD/2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dhyani, S., Dhyani, D. (2020). Local Socio-Economic Dynamics Shaping Forest Ecosystems in Central Himalayas. In: Roy, N., Roychoudhury, S., Nautiyal, S., Agarwal, S., Baksi, S. (eds) Socio-economic and Eco-biological Dimensions in Resource use and Conservation. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32463-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32463-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32462-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32463-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)