Advertisement

A Machine Learning Framework for Accurate Functional Connectome Fingerprinting and an Application of a Siamese Network

  • Ali Shojaee
  • Kendrick Li
  • Gowtham AtluriEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11848)

Abstract

The goal of functional connectome (FC) fingerprinting is to uniquely identify subjects based on their functional connectome. In recent years, interest in this problem has increased substantially with efforts made to understand the factors that affect the accuracy of fingerprinting and to develop more effective approaches. In this work, we developed a novel machine learning framework for FC fingerprinting. Specifically, while existing approaches match a query FC with a reference FC based on a correlation score between the two FCs, our framework employed a machine learning model to determine if two FCs are similar. This allowed us to capture more complex features from FCs and also to capture non-linear similarities that may exist among FCs. We explored multiple machine learning algorithms that include a Siamese neural network and several classification algorithms. From our experiments, we observed that the Siamese network outperformed other classification models, with an FC fingerprinting accuracy of \(99.89\%\).

Keywords

Functional connectivity Fingerprinting Parcellation Precision neuroscience 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSF Grant IIS-1850204. The computational work is performed using the Data Analytics Cluster acquired through the Ohio Dept. of Higher Education’s RAPIDS grant in 2018.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Airan, R.D., Vogelstein, J.T., Pillai, J.J., Caffo, B., Pekar, J.J., Sair, H.I.: Factors affecting characterization and localization of inter-individual differences in functional connectivity using MRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37(5), 1986–1997 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amico, E., Goñi, J.: The quest for identifiability in human functional connectomes. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 8254 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Atluri, G., MacDonald III, A., Lim, K.O., Kumar, V.: The brain-network paradigm: using functional imaging data to study how the brain works. Computer 49(10), 65–71 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bargmann, C.I., Marder, E.: From the connectome to brain function. Nat. Methods 10(6), 483 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bromley, J., Guyon, I., LeCun, Y., Säckinger, E., Shah, R.: Signature verification using a “siamese” time delay neural network. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 737–744 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bullmore, E., Sporns, O.: The economy of brain network organization. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13(5), 336 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castellanos, F.X., Di Martino, A., Craddock, R.C., Mehta, A.D., Milham, M.P.: Clinical applications of the functional connectome. Neuroimage 80, 527–540 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Defferrard, M., Bresson, X., Vandergheynst, P.: Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3844–3852 (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dubois, J., Adolphs, R.: Building a science of individual differences from fMRI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20(6), 425–443 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Finn, E.S., et al.: Functional connectome fingerprinting: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity. Nat. Neurosci. 18(11), 1664 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hammond, D.K., Vandergheynst, P., Gribonval, R.: Wavelets on graphs via spectral graph theory. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 30(2), 129–150 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kelly, C., Biswal, B.B., Craddock, R.C., Castellanos, F.X., Milham, M.P.: Characterizing variation in the functional connectome: promise and pitfalls. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16(3), 181–188 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ktena, S.I., et al.: Distance metric learning using graph convolutional networks: application to functional brain networks. In: Descoteaux, M., Maier-Hein, L., Franz, A., Jannin, P., Collins, D.L., Duchesne, S. (eds.) MICCAI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10433, pp. 469–477. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar, B., Carneiro, G., Reid, I., et al.: Learning local image descriptors with deep siamese and triplet convolutional networks by minimising global loss functions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5385–5394 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, K., Atluri, G.: Towards effective functional connectome fingerprinting. In: Wu, G., Rekik, I., Schirmer, M.D., Chung, A.W., Munsell, B. (eds.) CNI 2018. LNCS, vol. 11083, pp. 107–116. Springer, Cham (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00755-3_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peña-Gómez, C., Avena-Koenigsberger, A., Sepulcre, J., Sporns, O.: Spatiotemporal network markers of individual variability in the human functional connectome. Cereb. Cortex 28, 2922–2934 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Qi, Y., Song, Y.Z., Zhang, H., Liu, J.: Sketch-based image retrieval via siamese convolutional neural network. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2460–2464. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosen, B.R., Savoy, R.L.: fMRI at 20: has it changed the world? Neuroimage 62(2), 1316–1324 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shehzad, Z., et al.: The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. Cereb. Cortex 19(10), 2209–2229 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shuman, D.I., Narang, S.K., Frossard, P., Ortega, A., Vandergheynst, P.: The emerging field of signal processing on graphs: extending high-dimensional data analysis to networks and other irregular domains. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.0053 (2012)
  22. 22.
    Smith, S.M., et al.: Resting-state fMRI in the human connectome project. Neuroimage 80, 144–168 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sporns, O.: The human connectome: a complex network. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1224(1), 109–125 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Waller, L., et al.: Evaluating the replicability, specificity, and generalizability of connectome fingerprints. Neuroimage 158, 371–377 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EECSUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations