Abstract
Neuroimaging datasets keep growing in size to address increasingly complex medical questions. However, even the largest datasets today alone are too small for training complex machine learning models. A potential solution is to increase sample size by pooling scans from several datasets. In this work, we combine 12,207 MRI scans from 15 studies and show that simple pooling is often ill-advised due to introducing various types of biases in the training data. First, we systematically define these biases. Second, we detect bias by experimentally showing that scans can be correctly assigned to their respective dataset with 73.3% accuracy. Finally, we propose to tell causal from confounding factors by quantifying the extent of confounding and causality in a single dataset using causal inference. We achieve this by finding the simplest graphical model in terms of Kolmogorov complexity. As Kolmogorov complexity is not directly computable, we employ the minimum description length to approximate it. We empirically show that our approach is able to estimate plausible causal relationships from real neuroimaging data.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, L.M., Escalera, J., et al.: An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders. bioRxiv, p. 149369 (2017)
Buckner, R., et al.: The brain genomics superstruct project. HDN (2012)
Di Martino, A., Yan, C., et al.: The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism. Mol. Psychiatry 19(6), 659–667 (2014)
Dukart, J., Schroeter, M.L., Mueller, K.: Age correction in dementia-matching to a healthy brain. PLoS ONE 6(7), e22193 (2011)
Ellis, K., Bush, A., Darby, D., et al.: The australian imaging, biomarkers and lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging. Int. Psychogeriatr. 21(04), 672–687 (2009)
Fischl, B., Salat, D.H., et al.: Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33(3), 341–355 (2002)
Fortin, J.P., Cullen, N., et al.: Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites. Neuroimage 167, 104–120 (2018)
Gollub, R.L., et al.: The MCIC collection: a shared repository of multi-modal, multi-site brain image data from a clinical investigation of schizophrenia. Neuroinformatics 11(3), 367–388 (2013)
Guadalupe, T., Mathias, S.R., Theo, G., et al.: Human subcortical brain asymmetries in 15,847 people worldwide reveal effects of age and sex. Brain Imaging Behav. 11(5), 1497–1514 (2017)
Han, X., Fischl, B.: Atlas renormalization for improved brain MR image segmentation across scanner platforms. IEEE TMI 26(4), 479–486 (2007)
Jack, C.R., Bernstein, M.A., Fox, N.C., Thompson, P., et al.: The Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 27(4), 685–691 (2008)
Kaltenpoth, D., Vreeken, J.: We are not your real parents: telling causal from confounded by MDL. In: SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (2019)
Kruggel, F., Turner, J., Muftuler, L.T.: Impact of scanner hardware and imaging protocol on image quality and compartment volume precision in the ADNI cohort. Neuroimage 49(3), 2123–2133 (2010)
Kucukelbir, A., Tran, D., et al.: Automatic differentiation variational inference. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18(1), 430–474 (2017)
Linn, K.A., Gaonkar, B., Doshi, J., Davatzikos, C., Shinohara, R.T.: Addressing confounding in predictive models with an application to neuroimaging. Int. J. Biostatistics 12(1), 31–44 (2016)
Marcus, D.S., Wang, T.H., Parker, J., Csernansky, J.G., Morris, J.C., Buckner, R.L.: Open access series of imaging studies (OASIS): cross-sectional mri data in young, middle aged, nondemented, and demented older adults. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 19(9), 1498–1507 (2007)
Marek, K., et al.: The parkinson progression marker initiative (PPMI). Progress Neurobiol. 95(4), 629–635 (2011)
Mayer, A., et al.: Functional imaging of the hemodynamic sensory gating response in schizophrenia. Hum. Brain Mapp. 34(9), 2302–2312 (2013)
Milham, M.P., Fair, D., Mennes, M., Mostofsky, S.H., et al.: The ADHD-200 consortium: a model to advance the translational potential of neuroimaging in clinical neuroscience. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 6, 62 (2012)
Nooner, K.B., et al.: The NKI-rockland sample: a model for accelerating the pace of discovery science in psychiatry. Front. Neurosci. 6, 152 (2012)
Rao, A., Monteiro, J.M., Mourao-Miranda, J.: Predictive modelling using neuroimaging data in the presence of confounds. NeuroImage 150, 23–49 (2017)
Smith, S.M., Nichols, T.E.: Statistical challenges in “big data” human neuroimaging. Neuron 97(2), 263–268 (2018)
Torralba, A., Efros, A.A.: Unbiased look at dataset bias. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 1521–1528 (2011)
Van Essen, D.C., et al.: The WU-Minn human connectome project: an overview. Neuroimage 80, 62–79 (2013)
Wachinger, C., Reuter, M.: Domain adaptation for Alzheimer’s disease diagnostics. Neuroimage 139, 470–479 (2016)
Zuo, X.N., Anderson, J.S., Bellec, P., et al.: An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics. Sci. Data 1, 140049 (2014)
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by the Bavarian State Ministry of Science and the Arts in the framework of the Centre Digitisation.Bavaria (ZD.B).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wachinger, C., Becker, B.G., Rieckmann, A., Pölsterl, S. (2019). Quantifying Confounding Bias in Neuroimaging Datasets with Causal Inference. In: Shen, D., et al. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2019. MICCAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11767. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32251-9_53
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32251-9_53
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32250-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32251-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)