Interpretable Multimodality Embedding of Cerebral Cortex Using Attention Graph Network for Identifying Bipolar Disorder
- 2 Citations
- 6.8k Downloads
Abstract
Bipolar Disorder (BP) is a mental disorder that affects 1–2% of the population. Early diagnosis and targeted treatment can benefit from associated biological markers (biomarkers). The existing methods typically utilize biomarkers from anatomical MRI or functional BOLD imaging but lack the ability of revealing the relationship between integrated modalities and disease. In this paper, we developed an Edge-weighted Graph Attention Network (EGAT) with Dense Hierarchical Pooling (DHP), to better understand the underlying roots of the disorder from the view of structure-function integration. EGAT is an interpretable framework for integrating multi-modality features without loss of prediction accuracy. For the input, the underlying graph is constructed from functional connectivity matrices and the nodal features consist of both the anatomical features and the statistics of the connectivity. We investigated the potential benefits of using EGAT to classify BP vs. Healthy Control (HC), by examining the attention map and gradient sensitivity of nodal features. We indicated that associated with the abnormality of anatomical geometric properties, multiple interactive patterns among Default Mode, Fronto-parietal and Cingulo-opercular networks contribute to identifying BP.
References
- 1.Baker, J.T., et al.: Disruption of cortical association networks in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder. JAMA Psychiatry 71(2), 109–118 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Calhoun, V.D., Sui, J.: Multimodal fusion of brain imaging data: a key to finding the missing link(s) in complex mental illness. Biol. Psychiatry: Cogn. Neurosci. neuroimaging 1(3), 230–244 (2016)Google Scholar
- 3.Cao, B., Zhan, L., Kong, X., Yu, P.S., Vizueta, N., Altshuler, L.L., Leow, A.D.: Identification of discriminative subgraph patterns in fmri brain networks in bipolar affective disorder. In: Guo, Y., Friston, K., Aldo, F., Hill, S., Peng, H. (eds.) BIH 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9250, pp. 105–114. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23344-4_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Daducci, A., et al.: The connectome mapper: an open-source processing pipeline to map connectomes with MRI. PLoS ONE 7(12), 1–9 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Deppe, M., et al.: Increased cortical curvature reflects white matter atrophy in individual patients with early multiple sclerosis. NeuroImage: Clin. 6, 475–487 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Fischl, B.: Freesurfer. Neuroimage 62(2), 774–781 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Hibar, D., et al.: Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder: an MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the enigma bipolar disorder working group. Mol. Psychiatry 23(4), 932 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Kipf, T.N., Welling, M.: Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 (2016)
- 9.Li, X., Dvornek, N.C., Zhou, Y., Zhuang, J., Ventola, P., Duncan, J.S.: Efficient interpretation of deep learning models using graph structure and cooperative game theory: application to ASD biomarker discovery. In: Chung, A.C.S., Gee, J.C., Yushkevich, P.A., Bao, S. (eds.) IPMI 2019. LNCS, vol. 11492, pp. 718–730. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20351-1_56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lim, K., et al.: Cortical gray matter deficit in patients with bipolar disorder. Schizophrenia Res. 40(3), 219–227 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Liu, C.H., et al.: Regional homogeneity within the default mode network in bipolar depression: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. PLoS ONE 7(11), e48181 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Meunier, D., et al.: Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks. Front. Neurosci. 4, 200 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Öngür, D., et al.: Default mode network abnormalities in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 183(1), 59–68 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Power, J.D., et al.: Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72(4), 665–678 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Sheffield, J.M., et al.: Fronto-parietal and cingulo-opercular network integrity and cognition in health and schizophrenia. Neuropsychologia 73, 82–93 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Sporns, O.: Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience. Nat. Neurosci. 17(5), 652 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Sui, J., et al.: Function-structure associations of the brain: evidence from multimodal connectivity and covariance studies. Neuroimage 102, 11–23 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Tost, H., et al.: Prefrontal-temporal gray matter deficits in bipolar disorder patients with persecutory delusions. J. Affect. Disord. 120(1–3), 54–61 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Veličković, P., et al.: Graph attention networks. In: ICLR (2018)Google Scholar
- 20.Wang, F., et al.: Functional and structural connectivity between the perigenual anterior cingulate and amygdala in bipolar disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 66(5), 516–521 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Ying, Z., et al.: Hierarchical graph representation learning with differentiable pooling. In: NeurIPS (2018)Google Scholar