Learning-Guided Infinite Network Atlas Selection for Predicting Longitudinal Brain Network Evolution from a Single Observation

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11765)


Building accurate predictive models to foresee the temporal evolution of diverse medical data representations derived from healthy or disordered brain images will enable a formidable, yet challenging, leap forward in the fields of neuroscience and neuro-disorders. However, such models remain very scarce. Existing landmark works on predicting follow-up medical data from a single observation have a few drawbacks. First, these were developed only for predicting brain shapes or images, while brain network representations remain untapped. Second, the bulk of such models lies in the selection of reliable atlases in the baseline domain, which act as proxies for the follow-up domains where the missing data live. However, current atlas selection strategies for prediction suffer from two major limitations: (i) they are selected based on their proximity to the testing sample using a pre-defined distance, which might not be robust to outliers and constrains the locality of the high-dimensional data to a fixed bandwidth, and (ii) atlases are selected independently of one another, which overlooks how the importance of an individual atlas is influenced by all the other atlases in the set. To address these limitations, we propose LINAs, the first framework for predicting brain network evolution from a single timepoint using learning-guided infinite network atlas selection in two steps. First, we learn how to select the best atlases in an unsupervised manner by learning an adjacency graph which encodes the pairwise similarities between all atlases. The relevance score of an atlas is estimated using all possible infinite paths connecting it to other atlases in the set, quantifying its representativeness and centrality. Second, we propose to individualize the atlas score to the testing sample by a supervised re-weighting strategy. Our comprehensive experiments on healthy and disordered brain networks demonstrate the outperformance of LINAs in comparison with its variants as well as state-of-the-art methods. LINAs presents the first step towards building connectome evolution models that can be leveraged for developing precision medicine.


  1. 1.
    Rekik, I., Li, G., Yap, P., Chen, G., Lin, W., Shen, D.: Joint prediction of longitudinal development of cortical surfaces and white matter fibers from neonatal MRI. NeuroImage 152, 411–424 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gafuroğlu, C., Rekik, I., et al.: Joint prediction and classification of brain image evolution trajectories from baseline brain image with application to early dementia. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, pp. 437–445 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soussia, M., Rekik, I.: A review on image-and network-based brain data analysis techniques for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis reveals a gap in developing predictive methods for prognosis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.01951 (2018)
  4. 4.
    Cuingnet, R., et al.: Automatic classification of patients with Alzheimer’s disease from structural MRI: a comparison of ten methods using the adni database. NeuroImage 56, 766–781 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, M., Zhang, D., Shen, D., Initiative, A.D.N.: Hierarchical fusion of features and classifier decisions for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 1305–1319 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koikkalainen, J., et al.: Multi-template tensor-based morphometry: application to analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage 56, 1134–1144 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Min, R., Wu, G., Cheng, J., Wang, Q., Shen, D., Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: Multi-atlas based representations for Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 5052–5070 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fang, L., et al.: Automatic brain labeling via multi-atlas guided fully convolutional networks. Med. Image Anal. 51, 157–168 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roffo, G., Melzi, S., Cristani, M.: Infinite feature selection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 4202–4210 (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, B., Zhu, J., Pierson, E., Ramazzotti, D., Batzoglou, S.: Visualization and analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data by kernel-based similarity learning. Nature 70, 869–79 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mahjoub, I., Mahjoub, M.A., Rekik, I.: Brain multiplexes reveal morphological connectional biomarkers fingerprinting late brain dementia states. Sci. Rep. 8, 4103 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soussia, M., Rekik, I.: Unsupervised manifold learning using high-order morphological brain networks derived from T1-w MRI for autism diagnosis. Front. Neuroinform. 12, 70 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lisowska, A., Rekik, I.: ADNI: joint pairing and structured mapping of convolutional brain morphological multiplexes for early dementia diagnosis. Brain Connect. 9, 22–36 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BASIRA Lab, Faculty of Computer and InformaticsIstanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.National Engineering School of Sousse (ENISo)University of SousseSousseTunisia

Personalised recommendations