Abstract
The scholastic notion of ‘temporary appropriation’ of the public space refers to a wide range of urban scenarios that evoke conditions of either spatial, temporal or socio-economic disorder. Such disorder is manifested by the frequent contrast between the planned purpose of a public space and its actual use. Often, the unforeseen habits of the users of a place obscure the planned design narrative, adding a juxtaposed layer to the urban life. Analysis of the way people make use of a public space can reveal the contrasts by which the order designed by the planners becomes lost under a disorder or “not coded order” practiced by the users. Through direct observation via qualitative and quantitative investigation of diverse sources of the cause of ‘temporary appropriation’, this chapter investigates two phenomena in relation to its occurrence in public spaces in China. The first is the characteristic spreading of various domestic functions (such as cooking and laundry) onto the sidewalks of Shanghai. The second is the widespread use by Filipino maids of the squares and bridges of Hong Kong during their days off. The main aim of this essay is to highlight how such ‘user invasions’ reflect the resilience of these largely female communities in order to effectively and efficiently face issues related to affordable housing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barton, A. C. (2002). Urban science education studies: A commitment to equity, social justice and a sense of place. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 1–37 (Online). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560186.
Bay, J. H. P., & Lehmann, S. (2017). Growing compact: Urban form, density and sustainability (Online). New York, USA: Routledge. Taylor & Francis Group. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315563831.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, USA: Greenwood Press.
Burton, E. (2000). The potential of the compact city for promoting social equity. In Elizabeth Burton, Mike Jenks, & Katie Williams (Eds.), Achieving sustainable urban form (pp. 19–29). New York, US: Routledge.
Cappelletti, A. (2014). Qiu Xiaolong: così sparisce Shanghai (Online). 2014. cinaforum. Available from: http://www.cinaforum.net/intervista-qiu-xiaolong/. Accessed April 10, 2019.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
Crossa, V. (2009). Resisting the entrepreneurial city: Street vendors’ struggle in Mexico City’s Historic Center. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 43–63 (Online). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00823.x.
de la Torre, M. I. (2015). Espacio público y colectivo social. Nova Scientia, 14(7), 495–510.
Dempsey, N. (2006). The Influence of the quality of the built environment on social cohesion in English neighbourhoods. Oxford Brookes University.
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. In Sustainable development (Online) 19 (May 2009), (pp. 289–300). Available from https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417.
DeWolf, C. (2019). Hong Kong’s seat of power, Statue Square—Its colonial history, symbolism, and how domestic helpers made it their own. South China Morning Post [Online] 2 February. Available from: https://www.scmp.com/lifestyle/travel-leisure/article/2184584/hong-kongs-seat-power-statue-square-its-colonial-history.
Ekawati, S. A. (2015). Children—Friendly streets as urban playgrounds. In Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 179, 94–108 (Online). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.413.
Field, J. (2003). Social capital. London, UK: Routledge London.
Fonseca Rodriguez, J. M. (2015). La importancia y la apropiación de los espacios públicos en las ciudades. Revista de Tecnologia y Sociedad., 4(7), 1–11.
Gonzalez, M. (2012). Female open space invaders/Ellas filipinas Curator. D. Chipperfield (Ed.), International exhibition Venice Biennale Architecture “Common ground” (Online). Available from: http://www.marisagonzalez.com/home_in.htm.
Graumann, C. F. (1976). The concept of appropriation (aneignung) and modes of appropriation of space (Online), 6(2), 301–313. Available from: http://iaps.scix.net/cgi-bin/works/Show?iaps_00_1976_009.
Huxley, A. (1926). Jesting pilate: An intellectual holiday. George H. Doran Company.
Kim, A. M. (2013). Sidewalk City (Online). Chicago, US: The University of Chicago Press. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226119366.001.0001.
Klienhans, R., Priemus, H., & Engbersen, G. (2007). Understanding social capital in recently restructured urban neighbourhoods: Two case studies in Rotterdam. Urban Studies, 44, 1069–1091.
Korosec-Serfaty, P. (1976). Appropriation of space. In Proceedings of the Strasbourg conference. IAPC-3. 1976 Strasbourg-Lovaine La Neuve: CIACO.
Kuo, L. (2014). How Hong Kong’s “maid trade” is making life worse for domestic workers throughout Asia, Quartz (Online), 19 February. Available from: https://qz.com/176354/how-hong-kong-maid-tradeis-makinglife-worse-for-domestic-workers-throughout-asia/.
Kyle, G. T., Jun, J., & Absher, J. D. (2014). Repositioning identity in conceptualizations of human–place bonding. Environment and Behavior, 46(8), 1018–1043 (Online). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513488783.
Lara-Hernandez, J. A., & Melis, A. (2018). Understanding the temporary appropriation in relationship to social sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39C, 1–14 (Online). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.004.
Lara-Hernandez, J. A., Melis, A., & Caputo, S. (2017). Understanding spatial configuration and temporary appropriation of the street in Latin American cities: The case of Mexico City Centre. In H. Boudagh, A. Versaci, F. Trapani, & M. Migliore, et al. (Eds.), Advances in science, technology & innovation (pp. 153–173).
Lefebvre, H. (1992). The production of the space (1996th ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Li, J. (2014). Shanghai homes: Palimpsests of private life. Columbia University Press.
Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: A catchward between political pragmatism and social theory. Sustainable Development, 8(1), 65–79 (Online). Available from: doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2005.007375.
Martínez, E. (2014). Configuración urbana, hábitat y apropiación del espacio. Scripta Nova. Revista electrónica de geografia y ciencias sociales, XVIII(493), 20.
McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions (27) Online. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.08.047.
Mehan, A., & Soflaei, F. (2017). Social sustainability in urban context. In: Architectural research addressing societal challenges (pp. 293–299). CRC Press (Online). Available from: doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315226255-47.
Miquiabas, B. (2015). After another nightmare surfaces in Hong Kong’s Domestic Worker Community, Will anything change? Forbes (Online). Available from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/bongmiquiabas/2015/03/31/after-another-nightmare-surfaces-in-hong-kongs-domestic-worker-community-will-anything-change/#55b27fff7ee0.
Nasution, I. (2015). Urban appropriation: Creativity in marginalization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184, 4–12.
Pol, E., & Iñiguez, L. (1996). La Apropiacion del Espacio. Monografías Psicosoaicles Ambientales 9.
Pol Urrútia, E. (2002). El modelo dual de la apropiación del espacio en Mira, R., Sabucedo, JM y Romay, J. Psicología y Medio Ambiente. Aspectos psicosociales, educativos y metodológicos (pp. 123–132).
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: American’s declining social capital. New York, USA: Simon & Schuster.
Rapoport, A. (2005). Culture, architecture, and design. Chicago: Locke Science Publisher.
Seaman, J., & McLaughlin, S. (2014). The importance of outdoor activity and place attachment to adolescent development in Coös County, New Hampshire. Building Knowledge for Families and Communities, 208(37) (Online). Available from: http://scholars.unh.edu/carsey/208/.
Secher, L. K. (2014). Measuring social sustainability in the small-scale built environment. Bruxelles: Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
Siu, J. (2018). Why foreign domestic helpers in Hong Kong must live in their employers’ home? South China Morning Post (Online). 14 February. Available from: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/community/article/2133377/why-hong-kong-wants-foreign-domestic-helpers-live-their.
Tunas, D. (2008). The spatial economy in the urban informal settlement. Netherlands: Internation Forum on Urbanism.
Vidal-Moranta, T., & Pol Urrútia, E. (2005). La apropiación del espacio: Una propuesta teórica para comprender la vinculación entre las personas y los lugares. Anuario de Psicologia, 36(3), 281–297 (Online). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0185.
Wang, A. (2008). The song of everlasting sorrow: A novel of Shanghai. Columbia University Press.
Xiaolong, Q. (2013). Years of red dust: Stories of Shanghai (Digital ed.). Marsilio Editori: Venezia.
Yory, M. C. (2011). El Concepto de Topofilia entendido como Teoría del Lugar. Revista Barrio Taller (pp. 1–17).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lai, A. (2020). Temporary Appropriation in Shanghai and Hong Kong: Two Study Cases Assessing the Resilience of Women Faced with the Lack of Affordable Housing. In: Melis, A., Lara-Hernandez, J., Thompson, J. (eds) Temporary Appropriation in Cities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32120-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32120-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-32119-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-32120-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)