Co-constructed Auto/Biographies in Dwarfism Mothering Research: Imagining Opportunities for Social Justice



In this chapter, I reflect on my experiences as an average statured mother to a child with dwarfism, researching within the community. The notion of justice is intrinsically tied into our social constructions of humanity and what it means to be human. As a researcher, I question whether dwarfism could ever be separated from the exploitative historical and cultural portrayals which have plagued and blighted our fight for social justice both inside and outside of the community. In this chapter, I explore intrusive interactions with ‘outsiders’ which reinforce my fears that the Dwarf body is seen as problematic and in need of ‘normalisation’. This chapter is therefore an auto/biographical reflection of my blurred identities as a mother/researcher and my personal pursuit of social justice.


  1. Ablon, J. (1984). Little People in America: The Social Dimensions of Dwarfism. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  2. Adelson, B. (2005). The Lives of Dwarfs: Their Journey from Public Curiosity Toward Social Liberation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1997). Parent-as-Researcher: The Politics of Researching in the Personal Life. In R. Hertz (Ed.), Reflexivity and Voice (pp. 21–44). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Aubrecht, K., & La Monica, N. (2017). (Dis)Embodied Disclosure in Higher Education: A Co-constructed Narrative. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 47(3), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Backstrom, L. (2012). From the Freak Show to the Living Room: Cultural Representations of Dwarfism and Obesity. Sociological Forum, 27(3), 682–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger, R., & Quinney, R. (2005). Storytelling Sociology: Narrative as Social Inquiry. London: Lynne Rienne.Google Scholar
  7. Bogdan, R. (1988). Freak Show: Presenting Human Oddities for Amusement and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. British Sociological Association. (2017). Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association [online]. Available from Last Accessed on 14 August 2018.
  9. Carpenter, J., & McConkey, R. (2012). Disabled Children’s Voices: The Nature and Role of Future Empirical Enquiry. Children and Society, 26(3), 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cokley, R. (2018). On Parenting and Consent: When Sharing Isn’t Caring. Rewire News. Available here Last Accessed on 30 July 2018.
  11. Cooper, L., & Rogers, C. (2015). Mothering and ‘Insider’ Dilemmas: Feminist Sociologists in the Research Process. Sociological Research Online, 20(2), 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dasen, V. (2013). Dwarfs in Ancient Egypt and Greece. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Donaldson, J., Aftab, S., & Bradish, C. (2015). Achondroplasia and Limb Lengthening: Results in a UK Cohort and Review of the Literature. Journal of Orthopaedics, 12(1), 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunn, D. S., & Andrews, E. E. (2015). Person-First and Identity-First Language: Developing Psychologists’ Cultural Competence Using Disability Language. The American Psychologist, 70(3), 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ellis, C. (2007). Telling Secrets, Revealing Lives: Relational Ethics in Research with Intimate Others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis, C. (2009). Revision: Autoethnographic Reflections on Life and Work. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  17. Ellis, L. (2018). Through a Filtered Lens: Unauthorized Picture-Taking of People with Dwarfism in Public Spaces. Disability and Society, 33(2), 218–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fairclough, N. (2010). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, J. (2015). Remaking Memory: Autoethnography, Memoir and the Ethics of Self. Faringdon, Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Fuchs, H. (2018). BioMarin Doses First Participant in Phase 2 Study of Vosoritide for Treatment of Infants and Young Children with Achondroplasia. Cision PR Newswire. Available here Last Accessed 30 July 2018.
  21. Giorgio, G. A. (2013). Reflections on Writing Through Memory in Autoethnography. In S. Holman Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Autoethnography (pp. 406–424). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  22. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  23. Grant, E. (2016). Laughing at Dwarfism Is the Last Acceptable Prejudice—But Don’t Seek My Approval for Your Intolerance. The Independent. Available here Last Accessed on 30 July 2018.
  24. Grant, E. (2018). Verne Troyer’s Tragic Death Underlines the Harm Mini-Me Caused People with Dwarfism. The Guardian. Available here Last Accessed on 30 July 2018.
  25. Green, S. E. (2002). Mothering Amanda: Musings on the Experience of Raising a Child with Cerebral Palsy. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 7(1), 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Kittay, E., & Feder, E. (2002). The Subject of Care: Feminist Perspectives on Dependency. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  28. Koren, Y., & Negev, E. (2004). In Our Hearts We Were Giants: The Remarkable Story of the Lilliput Troupe—A Dwarf Family’s Survival of the Holocaust. New York: Carroll and Graf Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Landsman, G. (2003). Emplotting Children’s Lives: Developmental Delay vs. Disability. Social Science and Medicine, 56(9), 1947–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Landsman, G. (2009). Reconstructing Motherhood and Disability in the Age of ‘Perfect’ Babies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the Vulnerable. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lynch, K. (2007). Love labour as a Distinct and Non-Commodifiable Form of Care Labour. Sociological Review, 55(3), 550–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacDonald, A. (2013). Researching with Young Children: Considering Issues of Ethics and Engagement. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 14(3), 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, T., & Bell, L. (2002). Consenting to What? Issues of Access, Gate-Keeping and ‘Informed’ Consent. In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop, & T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in Qualitative Research (pp. 53–69). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Mladenov, T. (2016). Disability and Social Justice. Disability and Society, 31(9), 1226–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Radić-Šestić, M., Ostojić, S., & Đoković, S. (2015). Attitude of Deaf Culture Toward Cochlear Implantation. Specijalna Edukacija I Rehabilitacija, 14(1), 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ribbens, J. (1998). Hearing My Feeling Voice? An Autobiographical Discussion of Motherhood. In J. Ribbens & R. Edwards (Eds.), Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: Public Knowledge and Private Lives (pp. 24–38). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogers, C. (2003). The Mother/Researcher in Blurred Boundaries of a Reflexive Research Process. Auto/Biography, XI(1 and 2), 47–54.Google Scholar
  39. Rogers, C. (2007). Parenting and Inclusive Education: Discovering Difference, Experiencing Difficulty. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers, C. (2009). (S)excerpts from a Life Told: Sex, Gender and Learning Disability. Sexualities, 12(3), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rogers, C. (2013). Intellectual Disability and Mothering: An Engagement with Ethics of Care and Emotional Work. In C. Rogers & S. Weller (Eds.), Critical Approaches to Care: Understanding Caring Relations, Identities and Cultures (pp. 132–143). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Rogers, C. (2016). Intellectual Disability and Being Human: A Care Ethics Model. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rogers, C. (this volume). Missing Data: The Sociological Imagination Beyond the Crime. In J. Parsons & A. Chappell (Eds.), The Palgrave Macmillan Handbook of Auto/Biography. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  44. Rogers, C., & Tuckwell, S. (2016). Co-constructed Research and Intellectual Disability: An Exploration of Friendship, Intimacy and Being Human. Sexualities, 19(5–6), 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ryan, S., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2009). From Advocate to Activist? Mapping the Experiences of Mothers of Children on the Autism Spectrum. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(1), 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwalbe, M. (1998). Goffman Against Postmodernism: Emotion and the Reality of the Self. Symbolic Interaction, 16(4), 333–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shakespeare, T., Thompson, S., & Wright, M. (2010). No Laughing Matter: Medical and Social Experiences of Restricted Growth. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 12(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sparkes, A. C. (2002). Autoethnography: Self-Indulgence or Something More? In A. Bochner & C. Ellis (Eds.), Ethnographically Speaking: Autoethnography, Literature, and Aesthetics. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  50. Steinberg, S. B. (2017). Sharenting: Children’s Privacy in the Age of Social Media. Emory Law Journal, 66(4), 839–884.Google Scholar
  51. Tillmann, L. M. (2009). Body and Bulimia Revisited: Reflections of “A Secret Life”. Journal of Inquiry, 15(2), 545–560.Google Scholar
  52. Toyosaki, S., & Pensoneau-Conway, S. L. (2013). Autoethnography as a Praxis of Social Justice: Three Ontological Contexts. In S. Holman Jones, T. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Autoethnography (pp. 557–575). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tummala-Narra, P. (2009). Contemporary Impingements on Mothering: Identity in the Contemporary World. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 69(1), 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Dijk, T. (1995). Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis. Japanese Discourse, 1(1), 17–25.Google Scholar
  55. Van Dijk, T. (1996). Discourse, Power and Access in Texts and Practice: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard, Eds., pp. 84–104). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations