Skip to main content

How to Understand Criteria for Academic Promotion on “Traditional” and “Research” Tracks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Roberts Academic Medicine Handbook

Abstract

Understanding the criteria for promotion is one of the most important aspects of managing a successful academic career. However, the blueprint for how to sustain our careers through advancement and promotion is often hard to locate. In part, this difficulty is associated with the unique and diverse positions that each of us holds, making it hard for institutions to develop a single blueprint that will fit all of us. However, there are strategies that we can use to understand the criteria for successful promotion through the ranks, even for those of us who are “one of a kind.” Effectively managing time and planning will establish an excellent foundation for meeting the criteria for promotion. Therefore, the aim of this chapter is to assist individuals in locating and understanding the criteria for promotion as well as provide some tips for strategically managing the promotion process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Roberts LW. Bootcamp for promotion. Presented at Stanford University School of Medicine; July 14, 2011; Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson SR. Becoming a productive academic writer. http://www.thrivingamidstchaos.com/articles.html. Accessed 23 Dec 2011.

  3. Gerin W, Kapelewski CH, Itinger JR, Spruill T. Writing the NIH proposal: a step-by-step guide. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seidenwurm DJ, Burleson JH. The medicare conversion factor. Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:242–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burroughs Wellcome Fund & Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Making the right moves: a practical guide to scientific management for postdocs and new faculty. 2nd ed. Research Triangle Park: Burroughs Wellcome Fund; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Darley JM, Zanna MP, Roediger HL, editors. The compleat academic: a career guide. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). US medical school faculty, 2017: Table 9, sex and rank. https://www.aamc.org/data/facultyroster/reports/486050/usmsf17.html. Accessed 29 Sept 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheryl Gore-Felton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gore-Felton, C. (2020). How to Understand Criteria for Academic Promotion on “Traditional” and “Research” Tracks. In: Roberts, L. (eds) Roberts Academic Medicine Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31957-1_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31957-1_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31956-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31957-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics