Skip to main content

A Review of Preservation Practices and Attitudes in Historic District Act Municipalities of Pennsylvania

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban and Regional Planning and Development

Abstract

In a growing number of communities preservation planning has been recognized and pursued for its benefits such as making history, heritage and historic character strong building blocks for revitalization, growth, tourism and job creation. Conceptually, preservation planning in the United States dates back to the decades preceding the civil war when efforts to preserve resources associated with significant figures and events in American history. Subsequent to that time, federal, state, and local legislation, including the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, have contributed significantly to legitimizing historic preservation activities. In Pennsylvania state legislation such as the Historic District Act (HDA; Act 167 of 1961), the Municipalities Planning Code (MPC; Act 247 of 1968), and Home Rule Charters have all paved the way to provide legal authority for local communities to regulate for historic preservation. Given this legal context, this chapter presents a discussion of the significance and evolution of historic preservation in the United States, the role of federal, state and local governments in historic preservation, outlines the historic preservation in Pennsylvania with a focus on the Historic District Act and finally presents findings of a survey of stakeholders conducted to understand what strategies, techniques and tools are being used under the auspices of the HDA, as well as an assessment of how effective these tools are. The survey reveals that while community attitudes are positive toward historic preservation activities, there is some unevenness in implementation. The public at large is broadly supportive of historic preservation activities, whether they be regulatory or non-regulatory approaches. The findings also suggest that, despite this overall level of public support and municipal satisfaction though, there seems to be a lack of capacity in addressing preservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blaesser BW, Weinstein AC (1989) Land use and the constitution: principles for planning practice. American Planning Association, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duerksen CJ, Goebel RM (1999) Aesthetics, community character and the law. Planning advisory service report number 489/490. American Planning Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstedt E (2014) Field representative. Preservation Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer JC, Roberts TE (1998) Land use planning and control law. West Group, St. Paul, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefevre MR (1997) Historic District Designation in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), Act of 1968, P.L. 805, No. 247 as reenacted and amended. Retrieved from https://dced.pa.gov/download/pennsylvania-municipalities-planning-code-act-247-of-1968/

  • Pond L, Pomeroy G (2007) Building a better ordinance. In: Thakur B et al (eds) City, society, and planning: society vol 2, p 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryberg SR (2013) Historic preservation’s urban renewal roots: preservation and planning in midcentury Philadelphia. J Urban Hist 39(2):193–213. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (Accessed 7 Sept 2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Sweden B (2014) Community preservation coordinator, Susquehanna Region, State Historic Preservation Office, Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission. Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George M. Pomeroy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McNamee, M., Pomeroy, G.M. (2020). A Review of Preservation Practices and Attitudes in Historic District Act Municipalities of Pennsylvania. In: Thakur, R., Dutt, A., Thakur, S., Pomeroy, G. (eds) Urban and Regional Planning and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31776-8_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics