Abstract
Researcher believe that repeat and near-repeat phenomena can inform how police react to earlier crime in preventing the future crime in near space and time. The current research utilizes a modified Knox close-pair method with spatial-temporal referenced data of gun violence and firearm arrests in Houston. The study assesses police responses to repeat/near-repeat and independent shootings and compares their differences at various spatial and temporal intervals. These examinations and comparisons are carried out at a fine-grained spatial scales and temporal scales. Results show that compared to independent shootings, police response to repeat/near-repeat shootings is different in terms of response level and spatial-temporal contour.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Although study police response time to calls for service is a traditional line of research, “responsiveness” here does not mean how quickly police respond to a specific call for service, but how police respond to earlier increased general criminal activities or situations.
- 2.
Consider how police respond to calls for service. Timely on-scene response of a patrol unit will only be provided if the call is apparently serious. To noncritical calls for police service, alternative responses will be applied, such as 30 minute-delay on-scene response, telephone reporting and adjustment, walk-in reporting, and scheduled appointment response. These different responses illustrate how police agencies tend to more efficiently utilize resources through strategically and spatiotemporally arranging policing activities. For example, compared to an immediate on-scene response, either a 30-minute delayed (temporally lagged) response or an out-of-scene (spatially remote) response saves personnel resources. Police “response” to calls for service is different from police “response” to shootings as mentioned in the current work. Nevertheless, the two share a similar logic regarding the efficient distribution of police resources in space and time.
- 3.
Robberies by firearm are not included in shootings in our previous Houston study.
References
Bowers KJ, Johnson SD (2004) Who commits near repeats? A test of the boost explanation. West Criminol Rev 5:12–24
Brogden M, Jefferson T, Walklate S (1988) Introducing policework. Unwin Hyman, London
Cook PJ, Ludwig J (2000) Gun violence: the real costs. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cusson M (1993) Situational deterrence: fear during the criminal event. In: Clarke RV (ed) Crime prevention studies. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, pp 55–68
D’Alessio SJ, Stolzenberg L (1998) Crime, arrests, and pretrial jail incarceration: an examination of the deterrence thesis. Criminology 36:735–762
Decker SH, Kohfeld CW (1985) Crimes, crime rates, arrests, and arrest ratios: implications for deterrence theory. Criminology 23:437–450
Delgado R (1985) Rotten social background: should the criminal law recognize a defense of severe environmental deprivation? Law Inequal 3:9–90
Duan L, Ye X, Hu T, Zhu X (2017) Prediction of suspect location based on spatiotemporal semantics. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6070185
Emons W (2007) Escalating penalties for repeat offenders. Int Rev Law Econ 27:170–178
Fagan JA, Wilkinson DL (1998) Guns, youth violence, and social identity in inner cities. Crime Justice 24:105–188
Fagan JA, Wilkinson DL, Davies G (2007) Social contagion of violence. In: Flannery D, Vazsonyi A, Waldman I (eds) The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 688–723
Faye NR (1992) Space, time, and policing: To WARDS a contextual understanding of police work. Environ Plan D: Soc Sp 10:469–481
Gilderman G (2006) The dead of the night. Philadelphia Magazine, November 2006. www.phillymag.com/articles/the-dead-of-night/. Accessed 1 Aug 2013
Grubesic TH, Mack EA (2008) Spatio-temporal interaction of urban crime. J Quant Criminol 24:285–306
Herbert S (1997) Policing space: territoriality of the Los Angeles police department. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Holdway S (1983) Inside the British police: a force at work. Blackwell, Oxford
Jacob H, Rich JR (1980) The effects of the police on crime: a second look. Law Soc Rev 15:109–122
Johnson SD, Bowers KJ (2004a) The burglary as clue to the future: the beginnings of prospective hot-spotting. Eur J Criminol 1:237–255
Johnson SD, Bowers KJ (2004b) The stability of space-time clusters of burglary. Br J Criminol 44:55–65
Johnson SD, Summers L, Pease K (2009) Offender as forager? A direct test of the boost account of victimization. J Quant Criminol 25:181–200
Kleck G (1998) Has the gun deterrence hypothesis been discredited?. J Firearms Public Policy 10:65–75
Knox G (1964) Epidemiology of childhood leukaemia in Northumberland and Durham. Br J Prev Soc Med 18:17–24
Kohfeld CW (1983) Rational cops, rational robbers, and information. J Crim Justice 11:459–466
Kohfeld CW, Sprague J (1990) Demography, police behavior, and deterrence. Criminology 28:111–136
Leipnik M, Ye X, Wu L (2013) Jurisdictional boundaries and crime analysis: policy and practice. Reg Sci Policy Pract 1:45–65
Lizotte AJ, Howard GJ, Krohn MD, Thornberry TP (1997) Patterns of illegal gun carrying among urban young males. Valpso Univ Law Rev 31:375–393
Maggs GE (1992) Flexibility and discretion in police work. The World & I, Mar, at 516
Mastrofski SD, Weisburd D, Braga A (2010) Rethinking policing: the policy implications of hot spots of crime. In: Frost A, Freilich JD, Clear TR (eds) Contemporary issues in criminal justice policy: policy proposals from the American society of criminology conference. Cengage Learning, Florence, KY, pp 251–264
Moore H (1980) The police and weapons offenses. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 452:22–32
Morgan F (2001) Repeat burglary in a Perth suburb: indicator of short-term or long-term risk? In: Farrell G, Pease K (eds) Repeat victimization. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, pp 83–118
Parks RB, Mastrofski SD, Delong D, Gray MK (1999) How officers spend their time with the community. Justice Q 16:483–518
Ratcliffe JH (2008) Near repeat calculator (version 1.1). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA and The National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC
Ratcliffe JH, Rengert GF (2008) Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Secur J 21:58–76
Reiner R (1985) The politics of the police. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Sherman LW, Weisburd D (1995) General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: a randomized controlled trial. Justice Q 12:625–648
Townsley M, Homel R, Chaseling J (2003) Infectious burglaries: a test of the near repeat hypothesis. Br J Criminol 43:615–633
Weisburd D, Green L (1995) Policing drug hot-spots: the Jersey city drug market analysis experiment. Justice Q 12:711–735
Wells W, Wu L (2011) Proactive policing effects on repeat and near-repeat shootings in Houston. Police Q 14:298–319
Wells W, Wu L, Ye X (2012) Patterns of near-repeat gun assaults in Houston. J Res Crime Delinq 49:186–212
Wilkinson DL (2003) Guns, violence, and identity among African American and Latino youth. LFB Scholarly Publishing, New York
Wilkinson DL, Fagan J (1996) The role of firearms in violence “scripts”: the dynamics of gun events among adolescent males. Law Contemp Probl 59:55–89
Wright JD, Rossi PH (1994) Armed and considered dangerous: a survey of felons and their firearms. Aldine Transaction, New York
Wu L, Ye X, Webb D (2012) Space-time analysis of auto burglary patterns in a fast-growing small city. Int J Appl Geospatial Res 3(4):69–86
Wu L, Xu X, Ye X, Zhu X (2015a) Repeat and near-repeat burglaries and offender involvement in a large Chinese city. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 42(2):178–189
Wu L, Liu X, Ye X, Leipnik M, Lee J, Zhu X (2015b) Permeability, space syntax, and the patterning of residential burglaries in urban China. Appl Geogr 60:261–265
Wyant B (2010) Micro-level spatio-temporal relationships between firearm arrests and shootings in Philadelphia: implications for understanding of crime, time, place, and policing. Dissertation, Temple University
Wyant B, Taylor R, Ratcliffe J, Wood J (2011) Deterrence, firearm arrests, and subsequent shootings: A micro-level spatio-temporal analysis. Justice Q. First published on: 14 June 2011 (iFirst)
Ye X, Wu L (2011) Analyzing the dynamics of homicide patterns in Chicago: ESDA and spatial panel approaches. Appl Geogr 31:800–807
Ye X, Wu L, Lee J (2017a) Accounting for spatiotemporal inhomogeneity of urban crime in China. Pap Appl Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2016.1268969
Ye X, Chen Z, Li S, Wu L (2017b) Public response to a campus shooting using social media. In: Schintler L, Chen Z (eds) Big data for urban and regional science. Routledge, London
Ye X, Xu X, Lee J, Zhu X, Wu L (2015) Space–time interaction of residential burglaries in Wuhan, China. Appl Geogr 60:210–216
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wu, L., Wells, W. (2020). Spatiotemporal Analysis of Shooting-Arrest Interaction in Houston. In: Thakur, R., Dutt, A., Thakur, S., Pomeroy, G. (eds) Urban and Regional Planning and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31776-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31776-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31775-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31776-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)