Skip to main content

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Shooting-Arrest Interaction in Houston

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban and Regional Planning and Development

Abstract

Researcher believe that repeat and near-repeat phenomena can inform how police react to earlier crime in preventing the future crime in near space and time. The current research utilizes a modified Knox close-pair method with spatial-temporal referenced data of gun violence and firearm arrests in Houston. The study assesses police responses to repeat/near-repeat and independent shootings and compares their differences at various spatial and temporal intervals. These examinations and comparisons are carried out at a fine-grained spatial scales and temporal scales. Results show that compared to independent shootings, police response to repeat/near-repeat shootings is different in terms of response level and spatial-temporal contour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although study police response time to calls for service is a traditional line of research, “responsiveness” here does not mean how quickly police respond to a specific call for service, but how police respond to earlier increased general criminal activities or situations.

  2. 2.

    Consider how police respond to calls for service. Timely on-scene response of a patrol unit will only be provided if the call is apparently serious. To noncritical calls for police service, alternative responses will be applied, such as 30 minute-delay on-scene response, telephone reporting and adjustment, walk-in reporting, and scheduled appointment response. These different responses illustrate how police agencies tend to more efficiently utilize resources through strategically and spatiotemporally arranging policing activities. For example, compared to an immediate on-scene response, either a 30-minute delayed (temporally lagged) response or an out-of-scene (spatially remote) response saves personnel resources. Police “response” to calls for service is different from police “response” to shootings as mentioned in the current work. Nevertheless, the two share a similar logic regarding the efficient distribution of police resources in space and time.

  3. 3.

    Robberies by firearm are not included in shootings in our previous Houston study.

References

  • Bowers KJ, Johnson SD (2004) Who commits near repeats? A test of the boost explanation. West Criminol Rev 5:12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogden M, Jefferson T, Walklate S (1988) Introducing policework. Unwin Hyman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook PJ, Ludwig J (2000) Gun violence: the real costs. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusson M (1993) Situational deterrence: fear during the criminal event. In: Clarke RV (ed) Crime prevention studies. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, pp 55–68

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Alessio SJ, Stolzenberg L (1998) Crime, arrests, and pretrial jail incarceration: an examination of the deterrence thesis. Criminology 36:735–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker SH, Kohfeld CW (1985) Crimes, crime rates, arrests, and arrest ratios: implications for deterrence theory. Criminology 23:437–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado R (1985) Rotten social background: should the criminal law recognize a defense of severe environmental deprivation? Law Inequal 3:9–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan L, Ye X, Hu T, Zhu X (2017) Prediction of suspect location based on spatiotemporal semantics. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6070185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emons W (2007) Escalating penalties for repeat offenders. Int Rev Law Econ 27:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan JA, Wilkinson DL (1998) Guns, youth violence, and social identity in inner cities. Crime Justice 24:105–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan JA, Wilkinson DL, Davies G (2007) Social contagion of violence. In: Flannery D, Vazsonyi A, Waldman I (eds) The Cambridge handbook of violent behavior. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 688–723

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Faye NR (1992) Space, time, and policing: To WARDS a contextual understanding of police work. Environ Plan D: Soc Sp 10:469–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilderman G (2006) The dead of the night. Philadelphia Magazine, November 2006. www.phillymag.com/articles/the-dead-of-night/. Accessed 1 Aug 2013

  • Grubesic TH, Mack EA (2008) Spatio-temporal interaction of urban crime. J Quant Criminol 24:285–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert S (1997) Policing space: territoriality of the Los Angeles police department. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdway S (1983) Inside the British police: a force at work. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob H, Rich JR (1980) The effects of the police on crime: a second look. Law Soc Rev 15:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Bowers KJ (2004a) The burglary as clue to the future: the beginnings of prospective hot-spotting. Eur J Criminol 1:237–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Bowers KJ (2004b) The stability of space-time clusters of burglary. Br J Criminol 44:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Summers L, Pease K (2009) Offender as forager? A direct test of the boost account of victimization. J Quant Criminol 25:181–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleck G (1998) Has the gun deterrence hypothesis been discredited?. J Firearms Public Policy 10:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox G (1964) Epidemiology of childhood leukaemia in Northumberland and Durham. Br J Prev Soc Med 18:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohfeld CW (1983) Rational cops, rational robbers, and information. J Crim Justice 11:459–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohfeld CW, Sprague J (1990) Demography, police behavior, and deterrence. Criminology 28:111–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipnik M, Ye X, Wu L (2013) Jurisdictional boundaries and crime analysis: policy and practice. Reg Sci Policy Pract 1:45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizotte AJ, Howard GJ, Krohn MD, Thornberry TP (1997) Patterns of illegal gun carrying among urban young males. Valpso Univ Law Rev 31:375–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggs GE (1992) Flexibility and discretion in police work. The World & I, Mar, at 516

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrofski SD, Weisburd D, Braga A (2010) Rethinking policing: the policy implications of hot spots of crime. In: Frost A, Freilich JD, Clear TR (eds) Contemporary issues in criminal justice policy: policy proposals from the American society of criminology conference. Cengage Learning, Florence, KY, pp 251–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore H (1980) The police and weapons offenses. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 452:22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan F (2001) Repeat burglary in a Perth suburb: indicator of short-term or long-term risk? In: Farrell G, Pease K (eds) Repeat victimization. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, pp 83–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks RB, Mastrofski SD, Delong D, Gray MK (1999) How officers spend their time with the community. Justice Q 16:483–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe JH (2008) Near repeat calculator (version 1.1). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA and The National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe JH, Rengert GF (2008) Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Secur J 21:58–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiner R (1985) The politics of the police. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman LW, Weisburd D (1995) General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: a randomized controlled trial. Justice Q 12:625–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsley M, Homel R, Chaseling J (2003) Infectious burglaries: a test of the near repeat hypothesis. Br J Criminol 43:615–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisburd D, Green L (1995) Policing drug hot-spots: the Jersey city drug market analysis experiment. Justice Q 12:711–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells W, Wu L (2011) Proactive policing effects on repeat and near-repeat shootings in Houston. Police Q 14:298–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells W, Wu L, Ye X (2012) Patterns of near-repeat gun assaults in Houston. J Res Crime Delinq 49:186–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson DL (2003) Guns, violence, and identity among African American and Latino youth. LFB Scholarly Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson DL, Fagan J (1996) The role of firearms in violence “scripts”: the dynamics of gun events among adolescent males. Law Contemp Probl 59:55–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JD, Rossi PH (1994) Armed and considered dangerous: a survey of felons and their firearms. Aldine Transaction, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Ye X, Webb D (2012) Space-time analysis of auto burglary patterns in a fast-growing small city. Int J Appl Geospatial Res 3(4):69–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Xu X, Ye X, Zhu X (2015a) Repeat and near-repeat burglaries and offender involvement in a large Chinese city. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 42(2):178–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu L, Liu X, Ye X, Leipnik M, Lee J, Zhu X (2015b) Permeability, space syntax, and the patterning of residential burglaries in urban China. Appl Geogr 60:261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyant B (2010) Micro-level spatio-temporal relationships between firearm arrests and shootings in Philadelphia: implications for understanding of crime, time, place, and policing. Dissertation, Temple University

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyant B, Taylor R, Ratcliffe J, Wood J (2011) Deterrence, firearm arrests, and subsequent shootings: A micro-level spatio-temporal analysis. Justice Q. First published on: 14 June 2011 (iFirst)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye X, Wu L (2011) Analyzing the dynamics of homicide patterns in Chicago: ESDA and spatial panel approaches. Appl Geogr 31:800–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye X, Wu L, Lee J (2017a) Accounting for spatiotemporal inhomogeneity of urban crime in China. Pap Appl Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2016.1268969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye X, Chen Z, Li S, Wu L (2017b) Public response to a campus shooting using social media. In: Schintler L, Chen Z (eds) Big data for urban and regional science. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye X, Xu X, Lee J, Zhu X, Wu L (2015) Space–time interaction of residential burglaries in Wuhan, China. Appl Geogr 60:210–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wu, L., Wells, W. (2020). Spatiotemporal Analysis of Shooting-Arrest Interaction in Houston. In: Thakur, R., Dutt, A., Thakur, S., Pomeroy, G. (eds) Urban and Regional Planning and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31776-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics