Abstract
In general, reflexivity is a turning back on oneself, a process of self-reference which recognizes the centrality of the subjectivity of the researcher to the production and representation of ethnographic knowledge. As I have done this research in my own social and cultural setting, this research has been immensely influenced and shaped by my own experience, memory and understanding of film and media. My ethnographic self has been a valuable resource for my research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I take bhodro as a cultural category that defines the boundary of moddhobitto or the middle class.
- 2.
There was a general understanding among the shop owners and sellers that anyone can copy foreign films and music as they were not subject to copyright. Some, however, suspected that their business might be lost in case the government put a halt to the copying business.
- 3.
Hartal or violent strikes were called by political parties to achieve their goals. Non-stop hartal was a common scene in Bangladesh in 2013 and 2014 following the demand for a national election under a free and fair caretaker government and as a protest against the trial of political leaders for their alleged war crimes in 1971.
References
Ahmad, M. (2004). Madrassa education in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Preliminary draft, conference paper, presented at Religion and Security in South Asia: An International Workshop, 19–22 August 2002, Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies, Honolulu, Hawaii. Retrieved from http://www.iiu.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/downloads/ird/downloads/madrassa-education-in-pakistan-and-bangladesh.pdf.
Ahmed, Z. (2000). When a Bangladeshi ‘native’ is not a Bangladeshi ‘native’. In P. Sillitoe (Ed.), Indigenous knowledge development in Bangladesh: Present and future (pp. 201–210). London, UK: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (1992). Personal narrative as a social approach to interpersonal communication. Communication Theory, 2(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00036.x.
Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Collins, P., & Gallinat, A. (Eds.). (2013). The ethnographic self as resource: Writing memory and experience into ethnography. New York: Berghahn Books.
Davies, C. A. (2008). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Denzin, N. K. (Ed.). (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research, 36(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/23032294.
Ginsburg, F. D., Abu-Lughod, L., & Larkin, B. (2002). Media worlds: Anthropology on new terrain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Imam, S. R. (2005). English as a global language and the question of nation‐building education in Bangladesh. Comparative Education, 41(4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050060500317588.
Madden, R. (2010). Being ethnographic: A guide to the theory and practice of ethnography. London, UK: Sage.
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523.
Muir, S. (2011). Multisited ethnography. In D. Southerton (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consumer culture (Vol. 2, pp. 1014–1016). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412994248.n375.
Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography (3rd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
Siddiqi, A. S. I. (2015, March 4). Madrasah. Banglapedia: National Encyclopedia of Bangladesh. Retrieved from http://en.banglapedia.org/index.php?title=Madrasah.
White, S. C. (2012). Beyond the paradox: Religion, family and modernity in contemporary Bangladesh. Modern Asian Studies, 46(5), 1429–1458. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X12000133.
Filmography
Bokul, T. H. (Director). (1989). Beder Meye Josna. [Motion Picture] Dhaka: Anadamela Cholochitra.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rahman, H. (2020). Ethnographic Fieldwork: The Self as an Informant and an Observer. In: Consuming Cultural Hegemony. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31707-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31707-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31706-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31707-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)