Skip to main content

Two Test Methods Comparison for Power Frequency Electric Field Shielding Materials Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering (ISH 2019)

Abstract

The personal protective equipment (conductive suit) should decrease the power frequency electric field high levels up to occupational permissible limit values for human safety. The personal protective equipment screening property realized by conductive materials which has shielding coefficient. It is relevant for practice to develop test method of conductive suit and materials protection properties by direct power frequency electric field measurement. The paper presents the comparison of results shielding materials testing by different methods. There were compared data of direct power frequency electric field measurement and standard test method according to IEC 60895. The suggested shielding efficiency test method was based on electric field strength measurements inside the metal holder covered by materials test sample placed in high level power frequency electric field. 14 test samples of protective suit textile with use two methods was compared. The results obtained by both methods were analyzed by means of linear approximation function as a correlation between suggested and standard test methods. This function defined minimal shielding efficiency requirements for conductive material of power frequency electric field personal protective equipment measured by suggested method. In prospect, the new method will allow conductive suits manufacturers to predict maximum possible power frequency electric field decrease for compliance with permissible limit values at workplaces. Therefore, the suggested method of shielding efficiency assessment is nearest to standardization in hygienic practice and control at workplaces parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Directive 2013/35/EU of 26 June 2013 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. ICNIRP Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys. 99(6), 818–836 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. SanPiN 2.2.4.3359-16 Sanitary-epidemiological requirements for physical factors in the workplace (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rubtsova, N., Paltsev, Yu., Pokhodzey, L., Perov, S., Tokarskiy, A.: Main principles of electromagnetic field occupational exposure risks management in Russia. Occup. Environ. Med. 75, A420 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Göcsei, G., Berta, I.S., Németh, B.: Safety considerations regarding to the shielding of electric fields during high voltage live-line maintenance. Acta Technica Jaurinensis 8(2), 153–164 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neira, L., Pascual, H., Portillo, M., Pérez, F., Albanese, A., Fata, O., Franchini, R., Burna, A., Stivanello, I.: A research on conductive clothing for life working. In: 11th International Conference on Live Maintenance (ICOLIM), Budapest, Hungary (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pirkkalainen, H., Elovaara, J.A., Korpinen, L.: Decreasing the extremely low-frequency electric field exposure with a Faraday cage during work tasks from a man hoist at a 400 kV substation. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M 48, 55–66 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pääkkönen, R., Korpinen, L., Tarao, H., Gobba, F.: Possibilities to decrease the electric field exposure with a shield over worker under the 400 kV power lines. In: 2016 Progress in Electromagnetic Research Symposium (PIERS), Shanghai (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Korpinen, L., Pääkkönen, R.: Possibility to decreasing the 50 Hz electric field exposure with different jackets. Bulgarian J. Public Health 7(2), 62–65 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barbieri, L., De Maria, L., Chemelli, C., Gondola, M., Malgesini, R., Villa, A., De Donà, G.: A comprehensive analysis of facial screens: sensitivity analysis and construction technologies. In: 12th International Conference on Live Maintenance (ICOLIM), Strasbourg, France (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. IEC 60895-2002 Live working - Conductive clothing for use at nominal voltage up to 800 kV a.c. and ±600 kV d.c. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergey Perov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Perov, S. et al. (2020). Two Test Methods Comparison for Power Frequency Electric Field Shielding Materials Evaluation. In: Németh, B. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering. ISH 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 598. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31676-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31676-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31675-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31676-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics