Muscular Co-contraction Detection: A Wavelet Coherence Approach

  • Annachiara Strazza
  • Federica Verdini
  • Andrea Tigrini
  • Stefano Cardarelli
  • Alessandro Mengarelli
  • Sandro Fioretti
  • Francesco Di NardoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 76)


Muscular co-contraction is defined as the activity of agonist and antagonist muscles around a joint, enhancing joint stability and balance. The quantitative assessment of muscle co-contractions would be meaningful for deepening the comprehension of this physiological mechanism. Thus, the purpose of this work is to quantify muscle co-contraction using a Wavelet transform-based coherence analysis of sEMG signal during straight walking. To this purpose, sEMG from tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) and basographic signals were acquired in five healthy subjects during walking. Basographic signals were analyzed to quantify foot-floor contact. sEMG signals were processed using Wavelet Transform Coherence (WTC) to identify muscular co-contractions. Daubechies (order 4 with 6 levels of decomposition) was chosen as mother wavelet. A denoising algorithm based on a soft thresholding was applied for removing noise from raw signals. Denoised signals were considered to achieve WTC function, a well-known localized statistical assessment of cross-correlation between signals. Thus, in this work, WTC cross-correlation could be considered to assess muscular co-contraction. This methodology applied to TA and GL signals was able to detect GL/TA co-contractions during hell-strike (0–10% of GC) phase and during P-phase (54.2–68.3% of GC), matching with literature. Moreover, WTC approach was able to provide also the frequency band of information content for muscle co-contractions: 32–65 Hz for H-phase co-contraction and 16–32 Hz for P-phase co-contraction. In conclusion, this study proposed WTC analysis as a reliable method to assess muscle co-contraction in time-frequency domain.


Muscle co-contraction Time-frequency analysis Wavelet coherence Surface EMG 


  1. 1.
    Olney, S.J.: Quantitative evaluation of cocontraction of knee and ankle muscles in normal walking. In: Biomechanics IX: International Congress of Biomechanics, pp. 431–436 (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Falconer, K., Winter, D.A.: Quantitative assessment of co-contraction at the ankle joint in walking. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 25, 135–149 (1985)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosa, M.C.N., Marques, A., Demain, S., et al.: Methodologies to assess muscle co-contraction during gait in people with neurological impairment - a systematic literature review. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 24, 179–191 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di Nardo, F., Mengarelli, A., Maranesi, E., et al.: Assessment of the ankle muscle co-contraction during normal gait: a surface electromyography study. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 25, 347–354 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rioul, O., Flandrin, P.: Time-scale energy distributions: a general class extending wavelet transforms. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40, 1746–1757 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sukiennik, P., Białasiewicz, J.T.: Cross-correlation of bio-signals using continuous wavelet transform and genetic algorithm. J. Neurosci. Methods 247, 13–22 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hermens, H.J., Freriks, B., Disselhorst-Klug, C., Rau, G.: Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 10, 361–374 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agostini, V., Balestra, G., Knaflitz, M.: Segmentation and classification of gait cycles. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 22, 946–952 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farge, M.: Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 395–458 (1992)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Strazza, A., Verdini, F., Burattini, L., Fioretti, S., Di Nardo, F.: Time-frequency analysis of surface EMG signals for maximum energy localization during walking. In: IFMBE Proceedings, vol. 65, pp. 494–497 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reaz, M.B.I., Hussain, M.S., Mohd-Yasin, F.: Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications (correction). Biol. Proced. Online 8, 163 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strazza, A., Verdini, F., Mengarelli, A., Cardarelli, S., Burattini, L., Fioretti, S., Di Nardo, F.: A time-frequency approach for the assessment of dynamic muscle co-contractions. In: IFMBE Proceedings, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 223–226 (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Donoho, D.L.: De-noising by soft-thresholding. Trans. Inf. Theory 41(3), 613–627 (1995)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bonato, P., D’Alessio, T., Knaflitz, M.: A statistical method for the measurement of muscle activation intervals from surface myoelectric signal during gait. IEEE Tran. Biomed. Eng. 45(3), 287–299 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annachiara Strazza
    • 1
  • Federica Verdini
    • 1
  • Andrea Tigrini
    • 1
  • Stefano Cardarelli
    • 1
  • Alessandro Mengarelli
    • 1
  • Sandro Fioretti
    • 1
  • Francesco Di Nardo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Information EngineeringUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations