Microcalcification Cluster SDNR in Synthesized and 2D Mammography

  • Andreas Petropoulos
  • Spyros Skiadopoulos
  • Anna Karahaliou
  • Georgios Vlachopoulos
  • Gerasimos Messaris
  • Lena CostaridouEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 76)


This study aims at quantitative assessment of image quality of microcalcification clusters in synthesized-2-Dimensional (s2D) mammography (i.e. generated from digital breast tomosynthesis-DBT) as compared to 2-Dimensional (2D) mammography, in terms of the signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR). A mammographic phantom (Leeds, TORMAM) simulating microcalcification (MC) clusters located in varying parenchyma density patterns (fatty, glandular and dense) was imaged in 2D and DBT, considering two distinct scattering conditions (phantom thickness 30 mm and 50 mm). An accurate MC cluster segmentation method was used to delineate individual MC cluster particles and define overall cluster SDNR in s2D and 2D images. Pairwise comparisons of each cluster SDNR between 2D and s2D demonstrated no statistically significant difference across the three parenchyma density patterns (p > 0.05, Mann Whitney U test), for both scattering conditions. s2D demonstrated constant performance in terms of cluster SDNR with increasing surrounding parenchyma density, while in case of 2D, cluster SDNR is decreasing with substantial parenchyma density increase.


Breast tomosynthesis Synthesized images Image quality 


Conflict of Interest Declaration

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for the publication of this work.


  1. 1.
    Wahab, R.A., Lee, S.J., Zhang, B., Sobel, L., Mahoney, M.C.: A comparison of full-field digital mammograms versus 2D synthesized mammograms for detection of microcalcifications on screening. Eur. J. Radiol. 107, 14–19 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peters, S., Hellmich, M., Stork, A., Kemper, J., Grinstein, O., Püsken, M., et al.: Comparison of the detection rate of simulated microcalcifications in full-field digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, and synthetically reconstructed 2-dimensional images performed with 2 different digital X-ray mammography systems. Invest. Radiol. 52(4), 206–215 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ikejimba, L.C., Glick, S.J., Choudhury, K.R., Samei, E., Lo, J.Y.: Assessing task performance in FFDM, DBT, and synthetic mammography using uniform and anthropomorphic physical phantoms. Med. Phys. 43(10), 5593–5602 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nelson, J.S., Wells, J.R., Baker, J.A., Samei, E.: How does c-view image quality compare with conventional 2D FFDM? Med. Phys. 43(5), 2538–2547 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fitton, I., Noël, A.: Image quality comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis associated to synthesized image versus 2D FFDM. In: Conference: ECR 2017 EuroSafe Imaging, pp. 1–12 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baldelli, P., Bertolini, M., Contillo, A., Della Gala, G., Golinelli, P., Pagan, L., et al.: A comparative study of physical image quality in digital and synthetic mammography from commercially available mammography systems. Phys. Med. Biol. 63(16), 1–19 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arikidis, N., Vassiou, K., Kazantzi, A., Skiadopoulos, S., Karahaliou, A., Costaridou, L.: A two-stage method for microcalcification cluster segmentation in mammography by deformable models. Med. Phys. 42(10), 5848–5861 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karahaliou, A., Boniatis, I., Skiadopoulos, S., Sakellaropoulos, F., Arikidis, N., Likaki, E., Panayiotakis, G., Costaridou, L.: Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 12(6), 731–738 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cockmartin, L., Nicholas, W., Marshall, N., Bosmans, H.: Comparison of SNDR, NPWE model and human observer results for spherical densities and microcalcifications in real patient backgrounds for 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds.) IWDM 2014, LNCS, vol. 8539, pp. 134–141 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Petropoulos
    • 1
  • Spyros Skiadopoulos
    • 1
  • Anna Karahaliou
    • 1
  • Georgios Vlachopoulos
    • 1
  • Gerasimos Messaris
    • 1
  • Lena Costaridou
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Medical Physics, School of MedicineUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations