Automated Design of Efficient Supports in FDM 3D Printing of Anatomical Phantoms
Recent improvements in image segmentation techniques enabled the (semi)automatic extraction of biostructures surfaces from 3D medical imaging data. The diffusion of 3D printing technologies promoted their introduction in the medical field, giving rise to several applications, such as the development of 3D-printed anatomical imaging phantoms. These devices provide controlled experimental environments for the improvement of medical imaging techniques, as they mimic the morphological and physiological features of different body parts. However, to obtain a 3D printable model from medical imaging data, different post-processing steps are needed, which require a considerable effort. Supports generation is often a critical task, as it requires to find the minimum amount of support structures necessary to hold a part in place during the printing process. This is particularly difficult for complex anthropomorphic models, for which a high printing level of detail, along with a reasonable number of internal supports, is usually needed. In this paper, an automatic method for the design of efficient support structures is proposed, which is suitable for 3D printing of complex anatomical phantoms, even with non-professional FDM 3D printers. A custom design software was developed, which places paraboloid-shaped shells to support all and only the critical points of the 3D model. This provided different advantages over support generation by means of common slicing software, allowing a reduction of material waste and printing times, along with an easier and faster dissolution of soluble supports for the clean-up of phantoms empty volumes.
Keywords3D printing FDM Supports design Anatomical phantoms Medical imaging
Funding by the CNR Strategic Project “The Aging: Technological and Molecular Innovations Aiming to Improve the Health of Older Citizens” (http://www.progettoinvecchiamento.it) and by the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research (Project MOLIM ONCOBRAIN LAB) is gratefully acknowledged.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Tam, M.D.B.S., Laycock, S.D., Brown, J.R.I., Jakeways, M.: 3D printing of an aortic aneurysm to facilitate decision making and device selection for endovascular aneurysm repair in complex neck anatomy. J. Endovasc. Ther. 20(6), 863–867 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1583/13-4450MR.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Noecker, A.M., Chen, J.F., Zhou, Q., White, R.D., Kopcak, M.W., Arruda, M.J., Duncan, B.W.: Development of patient-specific three-dimensional pediatric cardiac models. ASAIO J. 52(3), 349–353 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mat.0000217962.98619.abCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Waran, V., Narayanan, V., Karuppiah, R., Thambynayagam, H.C., Muthusamy, K.A., Rahman, Z.A.A., Kirollos, R.W.: Neurosurgical endoscopic training via a realistic 3-dimensional model with pathology. Simul. Healthc.: J. Soc. Simul. Healthc. 10(1), 43–48 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1097/sih.0000000000000060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Cohen, A., Laviv, A., Berman, P., Nashef, R., Abu-Tair, J.: Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 108(5), 661–666 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Leary, M., Kron, T., Keller, C., Franich, R., Lonski, P., Subic, A., Brandt, M.: Additive manufacture of custom radiation dosimetry phantoms: An automated method compatible with commercial polymer 3D printers. Mater. Des. 86, 487–499 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Leng, S., Chen, B., Vrieze, T., Kuhlmann, J., Yu, L., Alexander, A., Jane Matsumoto, J., Morris, J., McCollough, C.H.: Construction of realistic phantoms from patient images and a commercial three-dimensional printer. J. Med. Imaging 3(3), 033501 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmi.3.3.033501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Alfano, B., Comerci, M., Larobina, M., Prinster, A., Hornak, J.P., Selvan, S.E., Amato, U., Quarantelli, M., Tedeschi, G., Brunetti, A., Salvatore, M.: An MRI digital brain phantom for validation of segmentation methods. Med. Image Anal. 15(3), 329–339 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2011.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Fedorov, A., Beichel, R., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., Finet, J., Fillion-Robin, J.-C., Pujol, S., Bauer, C., Jennings, D., Fennessy, F., Sonka, M., Buatti, J., Aylward, S.R., Miller, J.V., Pieper, S., Kikinis, R.: 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30(9), 1323–1341 (2012). PMID: 22770690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Friedman, T., Michalski, M., Goodman, T.R., Brown, J.E.: 3D printing from diagnostic images: a radiologist’s primer with an emphasis on musculoskeletal imaging putting the 3D printing of pathology into the hands of every physician. Skeletal Radiol. 45(3), 307–321 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2282-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar