Advertisement

On the Deliberative Use of the German Modal sollte

Conference paper
  • 374 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11717)

Abstract

This paper is about a particular use of the German modal sollte (‘should’) in the antecendent of conditionals as illustrated in (1)–(3). We call this use the “deliberative” use of sollte. We argue that on its deliberative use sollte doesn’t behave as the weak necessity modal it is standardly assumed to be. The distributional facts suggest that the use conditions of sollte-antecendents are closely related to the use conditions of conditional antecendents with the complementizer falls (‘in case’). Following a recent proposal by Hinterwimmer for falls, we propose that sollte in the antecendent of a conditional introduces a use condition that takes the truth of the antecendent proposition to be a truly open possibility against a given conversational background.

Keywords

Epistemic modals Conditionals Subjunctive mood 

References

  1. 1.
    Copley, B.: What should should mean. Manuscript. CNRS (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hinterwimmer, S.: A comparison of the conditional complementizers if and falls, Wuppertaler Linguistisches Forum (WLF), Universität Wuppertal (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kratzer, A.: The notional category of modality. In: Eikmeyer, H.J., Rieser, H. (eds.) Words, Worlds, and Contexts, pp. 38–74. de Gruyter, Berlin (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matthewson, L., Truckenbrodt, H.: Modal flavour/modal force interactions in German: soll, sollte, muss and müsste. Linguist. Ber. 255, 4–57 (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papafragou, A.: Epistemic modality and truth conditions. Lingua 116, 1688–1702 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Portner, P.: Modality. Oxford Surveys in Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schenner, M.: Double face evidentials in German: Reportative ‘sollen’ and ‘wollen’ in embedded contexts. In: Groenn, A. (ed.) Proceedings of SuB12, pp. 552–566. ILOS, Oslo (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yalcin, S.: Modalities of normality. In: Charlow, N., Chrisman, M. (eds.) Deontic Modality, pp. 230–255. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goethe University FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Waseda UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations