Skip to main content

The Market: Evolutionary Limits and Possibilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 256 Accesses

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism ((PASTCL))

Abstract

This chapter assesses if the free market is a suitable alternative to the shortcomings of liberal democracy from an evolutionary perspective, namely from the perspective of multilevel selection. This section scrutinises the hypothetical superiority of free markets over liberal democracies regarding preference satisfaction. The chapter focuses on the impact that free markets and their adjacent liberal satisfaction of preferences have on the evolutionary fitness of groups. To analyse such an impact, this chapter appraises the most relevant evolutionary defence of the institutional superiority of the market order: F. A. Hayek’s model of cultural group selection. Overall, chapter six answers to another central question of the book: what is the desirability of the liberal satisfaction of preferences concerning institutional sustainability?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alves, A. A., & Meadowcroft, J. (2014). Hayek’s Slipery Slope, the Stability of the Mixed Economy and the Dynamics of Rent Seeking. Political Studies, 62(4), 843–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D. (2008). Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., & Hammond, R. A. (2006). The Evolution of Ethnocentrism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(6), 926–936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (2011). Be Fruitful and Multiply: Growth, Reason, and Cultural Group Selection in Hayek and Darwin. Biological Theory, 6, 413–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, N. (2015). The Garden of Orderly Polity: F. A. Hayek and T. H. Huxley’s Views on Social Evolution. Journal of Bioeconomics, 17(1), 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the Forest: The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. (2005). Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Hamlin, A. P. (2004). Democratic Devices and Desires. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. (1999). Politics Without Romance: A Sketch of Positive Public Choice Theory and Its Normative Implications. In The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Liberty (Vol. 1, pp. 45–60). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A., Duryea, S., & Ferrara, E. (2012). Soap Operas and Fertility: Evidence from Brazil. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(4), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demoscope.ru. (2009). Russian Birth Rates 1950–2008. Retrieved from http://demoscope.ru/weekly/ias/ias05.php?tim=0&cou=26&terr=1&ind=26&Submit=OK.

  • Durkheim, E. (2001). Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (2005). Suicide: A Study in Sociology. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (2009). Sociology and Philosophy. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahim, K. (2013). Egypt’s Birthrate Rises as Population Control Policies Vanish. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/03/world/middleeast/as-egypt-birthrate-rises-population-policy-vanishes.html?_r=2.

  • Feldmann, H. (2005). Hayek’s Theory of Cultural Evolution: A Critique of the Critiques. In J. Backhaus (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, Money and Coordination: Hayek’s Theory of Cultural Evolution (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (2011). The Darwin Economy: Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A Fine Is a Price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, B., Martin, J., & Ventura, S. (2013). Births: Preliminary Data for 2012. National Vital Statistics Report, 62(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2007). David Hume: Moral & Political Theorist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorn, M., Kaznatcheev, A., & Shultz, T. (2013). The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 16(3), 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haub, C. (2012). Fact Sheet: World Population Trends 2012. Retrieved from http://www.prb.org/Publications/Datasheets/2012/world-population-data-sheet/fact-sheet-world-population.aspx.

  • Heckathorn, D. (1993). Collective Action and Group Heterogeneity: Voluntary Provision vs. Selective Incentives. American Sociological Review, 58, 366–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (2012). The Putin Era. In G. Gil (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Russian Politics and Society (pp. 13–17). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1975). Leviathan. London: Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (1991). Hayek’s Theory of Cultural Evolution: An Evaluation in the Light of Vanberg’s Critique. Economics and Philosophy, 7, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1994). Hume: Political Essays (K. Haakonssen Ed.). Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M., & Vanberg, V. (2001). Constitutional Choice, Rational Ignorance and the Limits of Reason. In Choice, Contract, and Constitutions (pp. 127–148). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R., & Oster, E. (2009). The Power of TV: Cable Television and Women’s Status in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3), 1057–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, Values, and Frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1995). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury, G. C. (1994). Self-Censorship in Public Discourse: A Theory of Political Correctness and Related Phenomena. Rationality and Society, 6(4), 428–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (2007). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1989). The Fatalistic Conceit. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 3(2), 310–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norenzayan, A. (2014). Does Religion Make People Moral? In F. de Waal, P. Churchland, T. Pievani, & S. Parmigiani (Eds.), Evolved Morality: The Biology and Philosophy of Human Conscience (pp. 229–249). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the Levels of Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumer, B. (2013). Why Are Birthrates Falling Around the World? Blame Television. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/13/why-are-birthrates-falling-around-the-world-in-a-word-television/.

  • Polanyi, K. (1968). The Economy as Instituted Process. In H. Schneider & E. LeClair (Eds.), Economic Anthropology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic-Times. (2008). Russian Policies Ignite Unprecedented Birth Rate in 2007. Retrieved from http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2008-02-02/news/27716412_1_interfax-birth-rate-russian-policies.

  • Rubin, P. (2000). Group Selection and the Limits to Altruism. Journal of Bioeconomics, 2(1), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P. (2007). Utility, Fitness, and Immigration: Reply to Salter. Journal of Bioeconomics, 9, 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P., & Gick, E. (2004). Hayek and Modern Evolutionary Theory. In R. Koppl (Ed.), Advances in Austrian Economics (Vol. 7, pp. 79–100). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, F. (2004). Is Ethnic Globalism Adaptive for Americans? Population and Environment, 25(5), 501–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, F. (2007). Proximate and Ultimate Utilities: A Rejoinder to Rubin. Journal of Bioeconomics, 9, 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (2008). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarbek, D. (2014). The Social Order of the Underworld: How Prison Gangs Govern the American Penal System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, B. (2010). The Current Evidence for Hayek’s Cultural Group Selection Theory. Libertarian Papers, 2(45), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G., Seldon, A., & Brady, G. L. (2002). Government Failure: A Primer in Public Choice. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P. (2006). War and Peace and War: The Rise and Fall of Empires. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uleman, J. (2010). Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (1986). Spontaneous Market Order and Social Rules: A Critique of F.A. Hayek’s Theory of Cultural Evolution. Economics and Philosophy, 2, 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1945). The Use of Knowledge in Society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1979). Law, Legislation and Liberty (Vol. III). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1984). Competition as a Discovery Procedure. In K. Leube & C. Nishiyama (Eds.), The Essence of Hayek (pp. 254–265). Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (1988). The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Hayek, F. A. (2009). The Pure Theory of Capital. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the Theoretical Foundation of Sociobiology. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 82(4), 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U. (1994). The Theory of Societal Evolution: Hayek’s Unfinished Legacy. In J. Birner & R. Zijp (Eds.), Hayek, Co-ordination and Evolution: His Legacy in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas (pp. 178–189). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeager, L. (2001). Ethics and Social Science: The Moral Philosophy of Social Cooperation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zywicki, T. (2000). Was Hayek Right About Group Selection After All? Review of Austrian Economics, 13, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Faria, F.N. (2019). The Market: Evolutionary Limits and Possibilities. In: The Evolutionary Limits of Liberalism. Palgrave Studies in Classical Liberalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31496-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31496-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31495-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31496-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics