Skip to main content

Bootstrapping the Gini Index of the Network Degree: An Application for Italian Corporate Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges in Social Network Research

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Social Networks ((LNSN))

  • 812 Accesses

Abstract

We propose a new approach based on bootstrapping to compare complex networks. This is an important task when we wish to compare the effect of a (policy) shock on the structure of a network. The bootstrap test compares two values of the Gini index, and the test is performed on the difference between them. The application is based on the interlocking directorship network. At the director level, Italian corporate governance is characterized by the widespread occurrence of interlocking directorates. Article 36 of Law 214/2011 prohibited interlocking directorates in the financial sector. We compare the interlocking directorship networks in 2009 (before the reform) with 2012 (after the reform) and find evidence of an asymmetric effect of the reform on the network centrality of the different companies but no significant effects on Gini indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the simulations we have considered very general networks in which there are no effects caused by preferential attachment, triadic closure, clustering tendencies, constraints on the degree distribution due to transaction costs, which may characterize economic networks. The different additions/destructions of the links occur randomly. In the future, we will consider more complex cases that consider these features. These more complex structures may lead to complex reactions to the addition/destruction of the different nodes. In particular, the process of addition/destruction may be quicker or slower with the implication that the test may be more or less likely to reject the null hypothesis.

  2. 2.

    Working with the projected two-mode would make it possible to analyze the inequality in degree both on the company and the director side.

References

  1. Drago, C., Millo, F., Ricciuti, R., Santella, P.: Corporate governance reforms, interlocking directorship and company performance in Italy. Int. Rev. Law Econ. 41, 38–49 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Enriques, L.: Corporate governance reforms in Italy: what has been done and what is left to do. Eur. Bus. Organ. Law Rev. 10, 477–513 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fich, E., Shivdasani, A.: Are busy boards effective monitors? J. Financ. 61, 689–724 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Battiston, S.: Inner structure of capital control networks. Physica A. 338(1–2), 107–112 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Battiston, S., Catanzaro, M.: Statistical properties of corporate board and director networks. Eur. Phys. J. B. 38(2), 345–352 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caldarelli, G., Catanzaro, M.: The corporate boards networks. Physica A. 338(1–2), 98–106 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bellenzier, L., Grassi, R.: Interlocking directorates in Italy: persistent links in network dynamics. J. Econ. Interac. Coord. 9, 183–202 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Piccardi, C., Calatroni, L., Bertoni, F.: Communities in Italian corporate networks. Physica A. 389(22), 5247–5258 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vasta, M., Drago, C., Ricciuti, R., Rinaldi, A.: Reassessing the bank–industry relationship in Italy, 1913–1936: a counterfactual analysis. Cliometrica. 11(2), 183–216 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Badham, J.M.: Commentary: measuring the shape of degree distributions. Netw. Sci. 1, 213–225 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wasserman, S.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, vol. 8. Cambridge University Press, New York (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Forcina, A., Giorgi, G.M.: Early Gini’s contributions to inequality measurement and statistical inference. Electron. J. Hist. Probab. Stat. 1, 31 (2005)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdon M.: Bootstrapping Gini. http://statadaily.ikonomiya.com/2011/05/23/bootstrappinggini/

  14. Mills, J., Zandvakili, S.: Statistical inference via bootstrapping for measures of inequality. J. Appl. Econ. 12(2), 133–150 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Efron, B.: The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans, vol. 38. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (1982)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Biewen, M.: Bootstrap inference for inequality, mobility and poverty measurement. J. Econ. 108, 317–342 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Jenkins, S.P.: INEQDECO: Stata module to calculate inequality indices with decomposition by subgroup. Statistical Software Components S366002, Boston College Department of Economics (1999), revised 22 Jan 2015

    Google Scholar 

  19. Csardi, G., Nepusz, T.: The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Syst. 1695, 1 (2006). http://igraph.org

    Google Scholar 

  20. Iacus, S. M., Masarotto, G.: labstatR: Libreria del Laboratorio di Statistica con R. R package version 1.0.7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=labstatR (2012)

  21. Erdös, P., Renyi, A.: On random graphs. Publ. Math. 6, 290–297 (1959)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Barabasi, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 286, 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Reiczigel, J., Zakari’as, I., R’ozsa, L.: A bootstrap test of stochastic equality of two populations. Am. Stat. 59(2), 156–161 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Santella, P., Drago, C., Polo, A.: The Italian chamber of lords sits on listed company boards: an empirical analysis of Italian listed company boards from 1998 to 2006, MPRA Paper No. 2265 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Drago, C., Ricciuti, R.: Communities detection as a tool to assess a reform in the Italian interlocking directorship network. Physica A. 466, 91–104 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Paolo Santella and Antonio Balzanella for useful discussions and two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments. Any remaining errors are ours alone. A previous version of the paper was presented at the SIS 2015 Conference.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Ricciuti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Drago, C., Ricciuti, R. (2020). Bootstrapping the Gini Index of the Network Degree: An Application for Italian Corporate Governance. In: Ragozini, G., Vitale, M. (eds) Challenges in Social Network Research. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31463-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31463-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31462-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31463-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics