A Multi-criteria Group Decision Making Method for Big Data Storage Selection

  • Jabrane KachaouiEmail author
  • Abdessamad Belangour
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11704)


The terms Data Lake and Data Warehouse are very commonly used to talk about Big Data storage. The two concepts are providing opportunities for businesses to better strengthen data management and achieve competitive advantages. Evaluating and selecting the most suitable approach is however challenging. These two types of data storage are often confused, whereas they have many more differences than similarities. In fact, the only real similarity between them is their ability to store data. To effectively deal with this issue, this paper analyses these emerging Big Data technologies and presents a comparison of the selected data storage concepts. The main aim is then to propose and demonstrate the use of an AHP model for the Big Data storage selection, which may be used by businesses, public sector institutions as well as citizens to solve multiple criteria decision-making problems. This multi-criteria classification approach has been applied to define which of the two models is better suited for data management.


Data Lake Data Warehouse Big Data AHP model Data storage platforms Decision-making 


  1. 1.
    Tsuchiya, S., Sakamoto, Y., Tsuchimoto, Y., Lee, V.: Big data processing in cloud environments. FUJITSU Sci. Technol. 48(2), 159–168 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peer Research, Big data analytics: intel’s it manager survey on how organizations are using big data, Intel (2012).
  3. 3.
    Lake, P., Drake, R.: Information Systems Management in the Big Data Era. Springer, London (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shamsi, J., Khojaye, M.A., Qasmi, M.: A data-intensive cloud computing: requirements, expectations, challenges, and solutions. J. Grid Comput. 11(2), 281–310 (2013). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh, D., Reddy, C.K.: A survey on platforms for big data analytics. J. Big Data 1(8), 1–20 (2014). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48(1), 9–26 (1990). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vaidya, O.S., Kumar, S.: Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 169(1), 1–29 (2006). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valacich, J., Schneider, C.: Information Systems Today: Managing in the Digital World, 6th edn. Pearson Education Limited, Australia (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lnenicka, M.: AHP model for the big data analytics platform selection. Acta Inform. Pragnesia 4(2), 108–121 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marakas, G.M., O’Brien, J.A.: Introduction to Information Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Wei, C.C., Chien, C.F., Wang, M.J.J.: An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 96(1), 47–62 (2013) Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z.: Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 17(2), 397–427 (2011). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liou, J.J.H., Tzeng, G.-H.: Comments on “Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview”. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 18(4), 672–695 (2012). Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wei, C.C., Chien, C.F., Wang, M.J.J.: An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 96(1), 47–62 (2005). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kachaoui, J., Belangour, A.: Challenges and Benefits of Deploying Big Data Storage Solution (2019).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science Ben M’SikHassan II UniversityCasablancaMorocco

Personalised recommendations