Abstract
Conventional morphological magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the standard imaging method for neuro-oncologic assessment; its primary roles consist of initial brain tumor evaluation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Pope WB, Brandal G. Conventional and advanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with high-grade glioma. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;62(3):239–53.
Villanueva-Meyer JE, Mabray MC, Cha S. Current clinical brain tumor imaging. Neurosurgery. 2017;81(3):397–415.
Fahrendorf D, Schwindt W, Wölfer J, et al. Benefits of contrast-enhanced SWI in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(10):2868–79.
Hsu CC, Watkins TW, Kwan GN, et al. Susceptibility weighted imaging of glioma: update on current imaging statusand future directions. J Neuroimaging. 2016;26(4):383–90.
Hori M, Ishigame K, Kabasawa H, et al. Precontrast and postcontrast susceptibility-weighted imaging in the assessment of intracranial brain neoplasms at 1.5 T. Jpn J Radiol. 2010;28(4):299–304.
Kim M, Kim HS. Emerging techniques in brain tumor imaging: what radiologists need to know. Korean J Radiol. 2016;17(5):598–619.
Patel SH, Poisson LM, Brat DJ, et al. T2-FLAIR mismatch, an imaging biomarker for IDH and 1p/19q status in lower-grade gliomas: a TCGA/TCIA project. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(20):6078–85.
Batchala PP, TJE M, Donahue JH, et al. Neuroimaging-based classification algorithm for predicting 1p/19q-codeletion status in IDH-mutant lower grade gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(3):426–32.
Delfanti RL, Piccioni DE, Handwerker J, et al. Imaging correlates for the 2016 update on WHO classification of grade II/III gliomas: implications for IDH, 1p/19q and ATRX status. J Neurooncol. 2017;135(3):601–9.
Hyare H, Thust S, Rees J. Advanced MRI techniques in the monitoring of treatment of gliomas. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2017;19(3):11.
Acknowledgments
The current chapter is a revision made by Saverio Pollice, Michela Capuano, and Tommaso Scarabino of the original chapter written by Saverio Pollice, Teresa Popolizio, and Tommaso Scarabino in the previous edition of the book.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pollice, S., Capuano, M., Scarabino, T. (2020). Magnetic Resonance Technique. In: Scarabino, T., Pollice, S. (eds) Imaging Gliomas After Treatment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31210-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31210-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31209-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31210-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)