Skip to main content

Design for Assembly in the Conceptual Development of Aircraft Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Conceptual design for assembly and installation is a key enabler for the improvement and development of an aircraft and related components. This work attempts to define a design for assembly methodology suitable for the evaluation and architecture design of aircraft systems in the preliminary phases of product development (conceptual design). Three main aspects are covered within this work: (i) the definition of a design framework, (ii) the characterization of suitable parameters driving the assessment and development of product architectures, and (iii) the formalization of internal knowledge for that purpose. The proposed approach has been tested in the assessment and development of an aircraft nose section with positive outcomes in terms of knowledge formalization and robustness of results in relation with the issues retrieved by the analysis of the assembly line. Future works will focus on the methodology optimization including automatic data input and mathematical models refinement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barbosa, G.F., Carvalho, J.: Design for manufacturing and assembly methodology applied to aircrafts design and manufacturing. Proc. IFAC 46(7), 116–121 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3182/20130522-3-BR-4036.00044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., Knight, W.: Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly. Marcel Dekker, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Favi, C., Germani, M.: A method to optimize assemblability of industrial product in early design phase: from product architecture to assembly sequence. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 6(3), 155–169 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0147-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hickie, D.: Knowledge and competitiveness in the aerospace industry: the cases of Toulouse, Seattle and north-west England. Eur. Plan. Stud. 14(5), 697–716 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500500254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holt, R., Barnes, C.: Towards an integrated approach to “Design for X”: an agenda for decision-based DFX research. Res. Eng. Design 21(2), 123–136 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-009-0081-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hopgood, A.A.: Intelligent Systems for Engineers and Scientists. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, G.Q.: Design for X: Concurrent Engineering Imperatives. Springer, Dordrecht (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3985-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuo, T.-C., Huang, S.H., Zhang, H.-C.: Design for manufacture and design for ‘X’: concepts, applications, and perspectives. Comput. Ind. Eng. 41(3), 241–260 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(01)00045-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lefever, D.D., Wood, K.L.: Design for assembly techniques in reverse engineering and redesign. In: The Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, T., Lockett, H.: An investigation into the interrelationship between aircraft systems and final assembly process design. Procedia CIRP 60, 62–67 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lucas Engineering Systems Ltd., University of Hull, Design for Manufacture and Assembly Practitioners Manual. Version 10 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mas, F., Ríos, J., Gómez, A., Hernández, J.C.: Knowledge-based application to define aircraft final assembly lines at the industrialization conceptual design phase. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 29(6), 677–691 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mas, F., Ríos, J., Menéndez, J.L., Gómez, A.: A process-oriented approach to modeling the conceptual design of aircraft assembly lines. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 67, 771–784 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Otto, K.N., Wood, K.L.: Product evolution: a reverse engineering and redesign methodology. Res. Eng. Design 10(4), 226–243 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001639870003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.-H.: Engineering Design. Wallace, K. (ed.) London (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3581-4

  16. Pal, S.K., Shiu, S.C.K.: Foundations of Soft Case-Based Reasoning. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Polacsek, T., et al.: Towards thinking manufacturing and design together: an aeronautical case study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 340–353 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69904-2_27

  18. Ramana, K.V., Rao, P.V.M.: Automated manufacturability evaluation system for sheet metal components in mass production. Int. J. Prod. Res. 43, 3889–3913 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandberg, S., Kalhori, V., Larsson, T.: FEM simulation supported KEE in high strength steel car body design. In: Proceedings of IMECE04 2004 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress, Anaheim, California, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schuh, G., Rudolf, S., Vogels, T.: Development of modular product architectures. Procedia CIRP 20, 120–125 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.05.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shehab, E.M., Abdalla, H.S.: Manufacturing cost modelling for concurrent (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stokes, M.: Managing Engineering Knowledge - MOKA: Methodology for Knowledge Based Engineering. ASME Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stone, R.B., McAdams, D.A., Kayyalethekkel, V.J.: A product architecture-based conceptual DFA technique. Des. Stud. 25(3), 301–325 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2003.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Suzuki, T., et al.: Assembly reliability evaluation method (AREM). In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ulrich, K., Eppinger, S.A.: Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill Education, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Velasquez, M., Hester, P.: An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int. J. Oper. Res. 10, 56–66 (2013)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Yancey, R.N.: Challenges, opportunities, and perspectives on lightweight composite structures: aerospace versus automotive. In: Lightweight Composite Structures in Transport, pp. 35–52 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-325-6.00002-5

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Favi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Favi, C., Formentini, G., Bouissiere, F., Cuiller, C., Dereux, PE., Malchair, C. (2020). Design for Assembly in the Conceptual Development of Aircraft Systems. In: Rizzi, C., Andrisano, A.O., Leali, F., Gherardini, F., Pini, F., Vergnano, A. (eds) Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering. ADM 2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31154-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-31153-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-31154-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics